Search

Background: In patients with mild to moderate left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) (35% pound LVEF pound 50%) who present with syncope, demonstration of tachy and/or brady-arrhythmia has prognostic value. In this group of patients electrophysiological study (EPS) is often necessary., Methods: A total of 53 consecutive patients with mild to moderate LVD and history of undetermined syncope underwent EPS. Sinus node function, His-Purkinje system conduction and ventricular electrical stability were evaluated., Results: Twenty eight patients (52.8%) had induction of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) and five (9.4%) patients had a sustained ventricular arrhythmia other than monomorphic VT (ventricular flutter, ventricular fibrillation, and polymorphic VT) induced during EPS. Abnormal sinus node function and/or His-Purkinje system conduction was found in five (9.4%) patients. Age, gender, history of myocardial infarction, type of underlying heart disease and history of revascularization were not predictors of VT induction. Wide QRS morphology independently, and lower left ventricular ejection fraction and presence of pathologic q wave in precordial leads dependently, could increase risk of VT induction., Conclusions: The EPS can determine which patient with syncope and mild to moderate LVD is likely to benefit from placing an ICD for prevention of sudden cardiac death. Pathologic precordial q wave, wide QRS morphology and lower left ventricular ejection fraction could be predictors of VT induction during EPS. Wide QRS morphology has an independent effect in this category.

Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the significance of QRS morphology in determining the prevalence of mechanical dyssynchrony in heart failure (HF) patients considered eligible for cardiac resynchronization., Methods and Results: A total of 200 consecutive HF patients (158 males, mean age 56 +/- 13.5 years) with standard indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) were evaluated prospectively. The prevalence of an interventricular mechanical delay > or = 40 ms was lower in patients with pure right bundle branch block (RBBB) than that in those with RBBB plus left fascicular hemiblock (RBBB-LFH) and those with left bundle branch block (LBBB) (33 vs. 50 vs. 54%, P = 0.05). A maximal difference in peak myocardial systolic velocity among all 12 segments (Ts) > 100 ms was found in 63% of the patients with LBBB, whereas it was present in 31% of the patients with pure RBBB and in 42% of those with RBBB-LFH (P < 0.001). A standard deviation of Ts (Ts-SD) > 34 ms was present in 58% of the LBBB subjects, but in only 29% and 42% of the patients with pure RBBB and RBBB-LFH, respectively (P < 0.001). Intraventricular dyssynchrony, however, was not different in patients with pure RBBB and in those with RBBB-LFH in terms of maximal difference in Ts (P = 0.25) and Ts-SD (P = 0.17)., Conclusions: Although LBBB was more often associated with intraventricular dyssynchrony, ECG sign of additional left ventricular (LV) conduction delay is not a helpful tool for the identification of intra-LV mechanical dyssynchrony in HF patients with RBBB who would benefit from CRT.

Objective: There is conflicting data regarding the tricuspid annular velocities and their relation to right ventricular filling pressures. We aimed to assess if the time interval between the onset of tricuspid E wave and annular Ea wave has any correlation with right sided filling pressure in patients with heart failure. Methods: Thirty heart failure patients (left ventricular ejection fraction<35%) were enrolled. Echocardiography was performed to obtain tricus-pid inflow and tissue Doppler annular velocities just before a standard right heart catheterization. The right atrial pressure was obtained from right heart catheterization. The E/Ea [the ratio of peak velocity of early tricuspid inflow wave (E) to peak velocity of early diastolic wave of the lateral tricuspid annulus (Ea)] and the time intervals between the beginning of R wave of electrocardiogram and onset of E (TE) as well as between the beginning of R wave and onset of Et (TEa) were measured, TE-Ea was calculated as TE-Ea. Results: The mean right atrial pressure (RAP) was 8.8 (SD=4.7) mm Hg. The mean TE-Ea was + 8.61 milliseconds. There was no significant cor-relation between RAP and E/Ea (r=0.08, p>0.05) but the correlation between TE-Ea and RAP was significant (r=0.5, p=0.01). Conclusion: According to our results and in contrary to some prior studies, we showed for the first time that right side TE-Ea stands as a better surrogate of right atrial pressure than E/Ea in heart failure patients. This finding needs more accurate studies and could present TE-Ea as a feasible tool to look into hemodynamics of heart failure patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Noninvasive techniques for the localization of the accessory pathways (APs) might help guide mapping procedures and ablation techniques. We sought to examine the diagnostic accuracy of strain imaging for the localization of the APs in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Methods: We prospectively studied 25 patients (mean age = 32 ± 17 years, 58.3% men) with evidence of pre-excitation on electrocardiography (ECG). Electromechanical interval was defined as the time difference between the onset of delta wave and the onset of regional myocardial contraction. Time differences between the onset of delta wave (δ) and the onset of regional myocardial contraction (δ-So), peak systolic motion (δ-Sm), regional strain (δ-ε), peak strain (δ-εp), and peak strain rate (δ-SRp) were measured. Results: There was a significant difference between time to onset of delta wave to onset of peak systolic motion (mean ± SD) in the AP location (A) and normal segments (B) versus that in the normal volunteers (C) [A: (57.08 ± 23.88 msec) vs. B: (75.20 ± 14.75) vs. C: (72.9 0 ± 11.16); p value (A vs. B) = 0.004 and p value (A vs. C) = 0.18] and [A: (49.17 ± 35.79) vs. B: (67.60 ± 14.51) vs. C: (67.40 ± 6.06 msec); p value ( A vs. B) < 0.001 and p value (A vs. C) = 0.12, respectively]. Conclusion: Our study showed that strain imaging parameters [(δ-So) and (δ-Strain)] are superior to the ECG in the localization of the APs (84% vs. 76%). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the significance of QRS morphology in determining the prevalence of mechanical dyssynchrony in heart failure (HF) patients considered eligible for cardiac resynchronization. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has emerged as an established therapy for congestive heart failure. However, up to 30% of patients fail to respond to CRT despite prolonged QRS. Objectives: This study aimed at defining the prevalence of interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony in heart failure patients with different QRS durations. Methods: A total of 123 consecutive patients with severe heart failure (LVEF < 35% and NYHA class III–IV) were prospectively evaluated using 12-lead electrocardiogram and complete echocardiographic examination including tissue Doppler imaging. Results: According to the QRS duration, 56 patients had a QRS duration ≤120 ms (Group 1), 33 patients had a QRS duration between 120 and 150 ms (Group 2), and 34 patients had a QRS duration ≥150 ms (Group 3). Intraventricular dyssynchrony was present in 36% of Group 1 patients, in 58% of Group 2 patients, and in 79% of Group 3 patients (P < 0.000). Linear regression demonstrated a weak relation between QRS and intraventricular dyssynchrony. A greater proportion of patients with interventricular dyssynchrony was observed in Group 3 or Group 2 compared to patients with normal QRS duration (32% in Group 1 vs. 51.5% in Group 2 vs. 76.5% in Group 3, P < 0.000). Linear regression demonstrated a significant relation between QRS duration and interventricular mechanical delay. Conclusions: Although both interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony increased with the increasing QRS duration, the correlation between intraventricular mechanical and electrical dyssynchrony was weak. The lack of intraventricular dyssynchrony in a fraction of patients with standard CRT indication by QRS duration may provide us insight into the nonresponders rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]