Search

Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) is a noninvasive technique to assess the bioelectric activity of the heart which has been applied to aid in clinical diagnosis and management of cardiac dysfunction. ECGI is built on mathematical models that take into account several patient specific factors including the position of the heart within the torso. Errors in the localization of the heart within the torso, as might arise due to natural changes in heart position from respiration or changes in body position, contribute to errors in ECGI reconstructions of the cardiac activity, thereby reducing the clinical utility of ECGI. In this study we present a novel method for the reconstruction of cardiac geometry utilizing noninvasively acquired body surface potential measurements. Our geometric correction method simultaneously estimates the cardiac position over a series of heartbeats by leveraging an iterative approach which alternates between estimating the cardiac bioelectric source across all heartbeats and then estimating cardiac positions for each heartbeat. We demonstrate that our geometric correction method is able to reduce geometric error and improve ECGI accuracy in a wide range of testing scenarios. We examine the performance of our geometric correction method using different activation sequences, ranges of cardiac motion, and body surface electrode configurations. We find that after geometric correction resulting ECGI solution accuracy is improved and variability of the ECGI solutions between heartbeats is substantially reduced., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Accurate reconstruction of cardiac activation wavefronts is crucial for clinical diagnosis, management, and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Furthermore, reconstruction of activation profiles within the intramural myocardium has long been impossible because electrical mapping was only performed on the endocardial surface. Recent advancements in electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) have made endocardial and epicardial activation mapping possible. We propose a novel approach to use both endocardial and epicardial mapping in a combined approach to reconstruct intramural activation times., Objective: To implement and validate a combined epicardial/endocardial intramural activation time reconstruction technique., Methods: We used 11 simulations of ventricular activation paced from sites throughout myocardial wall and extracted endocardial and epicardial activation maps at approximate clinical resolution. From these maps, we interpolated the activation times through the myocardium using thin-plate-spline radial basis functions. We evaluated activation time reconstruction accuracy using root-mean-squared error (RMSE) of activation times and the percent of nodes within 1 ms of the ground truth., Results: Reconstructed intramural activation times showed an RMSE and percentage of nodes within 1 ms of the ground truth simulations of 3 ms and 70%, respectively. In the worst case, the RMSE and percentage of nodes were 4 ms and 60%, respectively., Conclusion: We showed that a simple, yet effective combination of clinical endocardial and epicardial activation maps can accurately reconstruct intramural wavefronts. Furthermore, we showed that this approach provided robust reconstructions across multiple intramural stimulation sites., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Acute myocardial ischemia has several characteristic ECG findings, including clinically detectable ST-segment deviations. However, the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis based on ST-segment changes are low. Furthermore, ST-segment deviations have been shown to be transient and spontaneously recover without any indication the ischemic event has subsided., Objective: Assess the transient recovery of ST-segment deviations on remote recording electrodes during a partial occlusion cardiac stress test and compare them to intramyocardial ST-segment deviations., Methods: We used a previously validated porcine experimental model of acute myocardial ischemia with controllable ischemic load and simultaneous electrical measurements within the heart wall, on the epicardial surface, and on the torso surface. Simulated cardiac stress tests were induced by occluding a coronary artery while simultaneously pacing rapidly or infusing dobutamine to stimulate cardiac function. Postexperimental imaging created anatomical models for data visualization and quantification. Markers of ischemia were identified as deviations in the potentials measured at 40% of the ST-segment. Intramural cardiac conduction speed was also determined using the inverse gradient method. We assessed changes in intramyocardial ischemic volume proportion, conduction speed, clinical presence of ischemia on remote recording arrays, and regional changes to intramyocardial ischemia. We defined the peak deviation response time as the time interval after onset of ischemia at which maximum ST-segment deviation was achieved, and ST-recovery time was the interval when ST deviation returned to below thresholded of ST elevation., Results: In both epicardial and torso recordings, the peak ST-segment deviation response time was 4.9±1.1 min and the ST-recovery time was approximately 7.9±2.5 min, both well before the termination of the ischemic stress. At peak response time, conduction speed was reduced by 50% and returned to near baseline at ST-recovery. The overall ischemic volume proportion initially increased, on average, to 37% at peak response time; however, it recovered to only 30% at the ST-recovery time. By contrast, the subepicardial region of the myocardial wall showed 40% ischemic volume at peak response time and recovered much more strongly to 25% as epicardial ST-segment deviations returned to baseline., Conclusion: Our data show that remote ischemic signal recovery correlates with a recovery of the subepicardial myocardium, whereas subendocardial ischemic development persists., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Test the hypothesis that exercise and pharmacological cardiac stressors create different electrical ischemic signatures., Introduction: Current clinical stress tests for detecting ischemia lack sensitivity and specificity. One unexplored source of the poor detection is whether pharmacological stimulation and regulated exercise produce identical cardiac stress., Methods: We used a porcine model of acute myocardial ischemia in which animals were instrumented with transmural plunge-needle electrodes, an epicardial sock array, and torso arrays to simultaneously measure cardiac electrical signals within the heart wall, the epicardial surface, and the torso surface, respectively. Ischemic stress via simulated exercise and pharmacological stimulation were created with rapid electrical pacing and dobutamine infusion, respectively, and mimicked clinical stress tests of five 3-minute stages. Perfusion to the myocardium was regulated by a hydraulic occluder around the left anterior descending coronary artery. Ischemia was measured as deflections to the ST-segment on ECGs and electrograms., Results: Across eight experiments with 30 (14 simulated exercise and 16 dobutamine) ischemic interventions, the spatial correlations between exercise and pharmacological stress diverged at stage three or four during interventions (p<0.05). We found more detectable ST-segment changes on the epicardial surface during simulated exercise than with dobutamine (p<0.05). The intramyocardial ischemia formed during simulated exercise had larger ST40 potential gradient magnitudes (p<0.05)., Conclusion: We found significant differences on the epicardium between cardiac stress types using our experimental model, which became more pronounced at the end stages of each test. A possible mechanism for these differences was the larger ST40 potential gradient magnitudes within the myocardium during exercise. The presence of microvascular dysfunction during exercise and its absence during dobutamine stress may explain these differences., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)