Search

Electrocardiograms were taken from an 84-year-old man with right bundle branch block in whom atypical atrioventricular Wenckebach periodicity was frequently occurred. The electrocardiographic findings as mentioned below suggested that the atypical periodicity was caused by conduction through triple atrioventricular junctional pathways as a probable mechanism. When a P wave was blocked after a markedly prolonged PR interval of 0.64 s, the RP interval containing this blocked P wave ranged between 0.84 s and 0.86 s, and the next P wave was followed by a QRS complex of the same configuration, with the PR interval of 0.35 s. On the other hand, when a P wave was blocked after a PR interval of 0.49 s or 0.52 s, the RP interval containing this blocked P wave was comparatively long, ie, 0.95 s or 0.98 s, and the next P wave was followed by a QRS complex of somewhat different configuration showing borderline left axis deviation, with a shorter PR interval of 0.21 s or 0.23 s. These findings suggest that longitudinal dissociation occurred not only in the atrioventricular junction but also in the His bundle. This is the first report suggesting triple atrioventricular junctional pathways probably associated with longitudinal dissociation in the His bundle.

Electrocardiograms were taken from a 67-year-old man with 2:1 atrioventricular block in whom alternating reversed Wenckebach periodicity was found. Long PR intervals of alternately conducted P waves progressively shortened until an alternate P wave was blocked. After an alternate P wave was blocked, the next alternate P wave was conducted to the ventricles with a markedly long PR interval. Then long PR intervals of alternately conducted P waves progressively shortened again until an alternate P wave was blocked. This is the first report on alternating reversed Wenckebach periodicity. It seems that concealed electrotonic conduction of alternately blocked impulses occurred as a possible mechanism.

This article explains the mechanism of "irregular" parasystole. Two theories have been suggested: "electrotonic modulation" and "type I second degree entrance block." This study attempts to clarify the mechanism of irregular parasystole in cases of true ventricular parasystole associated with ventricular parasystolic couplets. Cases associated with ventricular parasystolic couplets were selected from 37 clinical cases of true ventricular parasystole in which one or more pure parasystolic cycles with no intervening nonectopic QRS complexes were found. Of the 37 cases of true ventricular parasystole, ventricular parasystolic couplets were found in 4 cases. In none of the other 33 cases, ventricular parasystolic couplets were found. In all the cases coexisting with ventricular parasystolic couplets, the latter ectopic QRS complex of the couplet failed to reset the parasystolic rhythm. The above findings suggest that the latter ectopic QRS complex of the parasystolic couplet originated not in the parasystolic pacemaker but in the pathway between the ventricle and the parasystolic pacemaker. It seems that when a sinus impulse fell late in the parasystolic cycle, it passed through the site of second degree entrance block and that the parasystolic couplets originated from the reentrant pathway between the ventricle and the pacemaker. This strengthens our previous suggestion that the mechanism of irregular parasystole is governed by "type I second degree entrance block" and not by "electrotonic modulation."

Blocking conduction between the sinus node and the atria (SA block) can be responsible for symptomatic rhythm problems. However, in atrial escape-capture bigeminy with SA block, when atrial escape P waves originate in a site within or close to the sinus node, the diagnosis of SA block is not easy. Electrocardiograms were selected from 7 people with atrial bigeminy because (1) all atrial deflections (P waves) were almost the same in shape and in length of PR intervals, (2) comparatively long PP intervals alternated with comparatively short PP intervals, and (3) occasionally the atrial bigeminy changed to normal regular sinus rhythm in which 2 or more sinus P waves were found in succession. An attempt is made to clarify the mechanism for these cases. When regular sinus rhythm changed to bigeminal rhythm, the long PP interval introduced the bigeminy in 3 cases, indicating the presence of "sinus" escape-capture bigeminy; whereas the short PP interval introduced the bigeminy in the other 4 cases, indicating the presence of "sinus" extrasystolic bigeminy. In cases of sinus escape-capture bigeminy associated with SA block, the cases may occasionally be diagnosed wrongly as ordinary sinus arrhythmia not associated with SA block. Therefore, it seems that sinus escape-capture bigeminy is not so rare as is generally believed. Patients with SA block often require implantation of the artificial pacemaker. Thus, the authors believe that differentiation of sinus escape-capture bigeminy from other forms of "sinus" bigeminy is clinically important.

A clinical evaluation of the surface-averaged ECG (SAE) to record His-Purkinje activity (HPA) was made on 70 patients who underwent His bundle electrograms (HBE). The recorded signals first judged as HPA in 43 patients by the noninvasive method alone were later verified in 37 patients by HBE; the accuracy of the HPA recordings (predictive value) was 86.0%. The HPA-V interval measured noninvasively had a high correlation with the HV interval by HBE (r = 0.89, p less than 0.01). The verified detection rate in all 70 patients was 52.9%: HPA was detected in 12 of 18 patients (66.7%) with sclerotic and hypertensive heart disease (Group I), five of 19 patients (26.3%) with rheumatic heart disease (Group II), 11 of 17 patients (64.7%) with congenital heart disease (Group III), and nine of 16 patients (56.2%) with miscellaneous conditions (Group IV). The detection rate was markedly lower in Group II than in other groups (Group II vs Group I or III, p less than 0.025). The PR segment was significantly longer in the patients in whom HPA was detected than in those in whom it was not detected (71.5 +/- 22.3 msec vs 43.9 +/- 19.5 msec, p less than 0.001). His-Purkinje activity (HPA) was detected in 32 of 52 recordings (61.5%) with sinus rhythm and seven of 20 recordings (35.0%) with atrial fibrillation, including two recordings in each of two cardioverted patients (p less than 0.05). We conclude that the surface-averaged ECG (SAE) has clinically acceptable sensitivity and accuracy except in patients with rheumatic heart disease, short PR segments or atrial fibrillations.