Search

Objectives: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for bipolar disorder, but relapse following a successful ECT series is common. We aimed to identify clinical and sociodemographic characteristics associated with the risk of relapse following ECT in bipolar disorder., Methods: Using data from nationwide Danish registers, we identified all patients receiving their first ECT series with an indication diagnosis of bipolar disorder between 2006 and 2018. We then followed these patients for relapse, defined as either psychiatric admission or a new ECT series, for 6 months following ECT. Associations between clinical and sociodemographic characteristics and relapse were examined via multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression, yielding adjusted hazard rate ratios (aHRR)., Results: Of the 1473 patients receiving ECT for bipolar disorder (62% females, mean age = 53 years), 34% met the relapse criterion. The following characteristics were associated with an elevated risk of relapse; age <40 (aHRR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.05-2.26); being a pensioner (aHRR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.29-2.32), indication diagnosis for ECT being psychotic mania (aHRR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.16-2.28), psychotic bipolar depression (aHRR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.06-1.80), mixed episode (aHRR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.13-2.02), or other bipolar episodes (aHRR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.28-2.21); and treatment with antipsychotics prior to the course of ECT (aHRR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.04-1.67)., Conclusion: Patients with bipolar disorder face a particularly high risk of relapse following ECT if they present with the following characteristics when initiating ECT: age <40, being a pensioner, having received treatment with an antipsychotic before initiating ECT, or having psychotic bipolar depression, psychotic mania, mixed episodes, or other bipolar episodes as the indication for ECT. These findings may guide relapse monitoring following ECT in bipolar disorder., (© 2024 The Author(s). Bipolar Disorders published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) en bloc is defined as ECT administered on 2-3 consecutive days. In Denmark, ECT en bloc is recommended for severe conditions such as catatonia, treatment-resistant mania/psychosis, or imminent risk of suicide. To our knowledge, there are no recent reports on the use of ECT en bloc in clinical practice. Here, we provide such a report., Methods: We characterized the use of ECT en bloc in the period from 2006-2019 based on data from Danish national registers. Furthermore, we compared mortality rates between patients receiving ECT en bloc and patients receiving standard regimen ECT (not en bloc )., Results: We identified 2173 patients who received a total of 2734 ECT en bloc treatment courses in Denmark in the period from 2006 to 2019 (6% of the total number of ECT treatment courses). The use of ECT en bloc was stable over the study period (range: 138-196 patients per year). The most common treatment indications were unipolar depression (41%), psychotic disorder (23%), and bipolar disorder (20%). The vast majority (90%) received ECT en bloc voluntarily. The 1-year mortality rate ratio for ECT en bloc compared to standard regimen ECT was 1.42 (95%CI: 1.03-1.95)., Conclusion: The use of ECT en bloc in Denmark is stable both in terms of the number of patients treated and treatment indications. In keeping with ECT en bloc being used for severe conditions, those receiving this treatment have a higher mortality rate compared to those receiving standard ECT, warranting careful monitoring during follow-up.

Objective: The use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the treatment of bipolar disorder (BD) remains poorly described. Based on data from Danish registries with complete nationwide coverage, this study of patients with incident BD aimed to describe when, how, and for whom ECT is used in the context of BD., Methods: We identified patients receiving their first diagnosis of BD in the period from 2008 to 2018, who subsequently received ECT. Descriptive statistics were used to clarify when, how, and for whom ECT is used., Results: We identified 1338 patients with incident BD who subsequently received ECT. The median age at the first ECT session was 50.6 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 26.4), and 62% of those treated with ECT were female. The median time from the diagnosis of BD to the first ECT treatment was 0.6 years (IQR: 2.6), and 58% of the patients receiving ECT had the first treatment within the first year after being diagnosed with BD. The most common indication for the first ECT treatment was depression (mainly non-psychotic depression), followed by mania (mainly psychotic mania). The first ECT session was typically provided to inpatients (97%), upon patient consent (98%) and with bilateral electrode placement (60%)., Conclusions: A substantial proportion of the patients with incident BD who receive ECT require this treatment within the first year after the diagnosis. The most common indication for ECT is depression followed by (psychotic) mania. Inpatient voluntary ECT using bilateral electrode placement is the most common form of administration., (© 2022 The Authors. Bipolar Disorders published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: The beneficial effect of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) on suicidality has been documented in clinical trials, whereas naturalistic studies on the topic are scarce and restricted to individuals with mood disorders. Here, based on population-based data from Danish registers, we aimed to investigate the course of self-harm and suicide attempts preceding and following ECT across 4 major mental disorders. This was done to examine whether data from the real-world clinical setting are compatible with the positive results from clinical trials., Methods: We identified all patients diagnosed with unipolar depression (n = 8843), bipolar disorder (n = 2713), psychotic disorder (n = 2692), or personality disorder (n = 2085) who received ECT for the first time in the period from 2008 to 2019, as well as age-, sex-, diagnosis-, illness duration-, and admission-matched comparison groups not receiving ECT. A mirror-image model was used to examine whether the number of incidents of self-harm/suicide attempts changed following ECT (paired t test)., Results: There were substantial and statistically significant reductions in the number of incidents of self-harm/suicide attempts when comparing the month leading up to and the month following initiation of ECT for all diagnostic groups (unipolar depression: reduction, 83% [P < 0.001]; bipolar disorder: reduction, 72% [P < 0.001]; psychotic disorder: reduction, 82% [P < 0.001]; personality disorder: reduction, 83% [P < 0.001]). The analog results for the comparison groups not receiving ECT suggested that these reductions in self-harm/suicide attempts were partly mediated by a protective effect of admission., Conclusions: Data from the real-world clinical setting are compatible with results from clinical trials with regard to the protective effect of ECT on suicidality., Competing Interests: E.S. reports no conflicts of interest. C.R. has received the 2020 Lundbeck Foundation Talent Prize. S.D.Ø. has received the 2020 Lundbeck Foundation Young Investigator Prize., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Involuntary electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) can be a lifesaving intervention for patients suffering from potentially lethal conditions who are unable to give informed consent. However, its use is not widespread, probably partly because of the scarce data on hard outcomes following involuntary ECT. In Denmark, involuntary ECT is only used when patients are at imminent/potential risk of dying if not receiving ECT. Here, we aimed to estimate the 1-year survival rate after the administration of involuntary ECT as a proxy for the effectiveness of this treatment., Methods: We conducted a register-based cohort study involving (i) all patients receiving involuntary ECT in Denmark between 2008 and 2019, (ii) age- and sex-matched patients receiving voluntary ECT, and (iii) age- and sex-matched individuals from the general population. One-year survival rates were compared via mortality rate ratios., Results: We identified 618 patients receiving involuntary ECT, 547 patients receiving voluntary ECT, and 3080 population-based controls. The survival rate in the year after involuntary ECT was 90%. For patients receiving involuntary ECT, the 1-year mortality rate ratios were 3.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.9-5.2) and 5.8 (95% confidence interval, 4.0-8.2) compared with those receiving voluntarily ECT and to the population-based controls, respectively. Risk factors for early death among patients receiving involuntary ECT were male sex, being 70 years or older and having organic mental disorder as the treatment indication., Conclusions: Treatment with involuntary ECT is associated with a high survival rate, suggesting that the intervention is effective. However, patients receiving involuntary ECT constitute a high-risk population that should be monitored closely after this treatment., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Involuntary electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) can be a life-saving intervention for patients suffering from potentially lethal conditions who are unable to give informed consent. However, its use is not widespread, probably partly due to the scarce data on hard outcomes following involuntary ECT. In Denmark, involuntary ECT is only used when patients are at imminent/potential risk of dying if not receiving ECT. Objectives: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of involuntary ECT by estimating the 1-year survival following its administration. Methods: We conducted a register-based cohort study involving i) all patients receiving involuntary ECT in Denmark between 2008 and 2019, ii) age and sex-matched patients receiving voluntary ECT, and iii) age and sex-matched individuals from the general population. 1-year survival rates were compared via mortality rate ratios. Results: We identified 618 patients receiving involuntary ECT, 547 patients receiving voluntary ECT, and 3,080 population-based controls. The survival rate in the year after involuntary ECT was 90%. For patients receiving involuntary ECT, the 1-year mortality rate ratios were 3.1 (95% confidence interval (CI)= 1.9-5.2) and 5.8 (95%CI = 4.0-8.2) compared to those receiving voluntarily ECT and to the population-based controls, respectively. Risk factors for early death among patients receiving involuntary ECT were male sex, being ≥70 years old and having organic mental disorder as the treatment indication. Conclusions: Treatment with involuntary ECT is associated with a high survival rate, suggesting that the intervention is effective. However, patients receiving involuntary ECT constitute a highrisk population that should be monitored closely after this treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]