Search

Background: Scalp EEG is one of the main tools in the clinical evaluation of epilepsy. In some cases intracranial Interictal Epileptiform Discharges (IEDs) are not visible from the scalp. Recent studies have shown the feasibility of revealing them in the EEG if their timings are extracted from simultaneous intracranial recordings, but their potential for the localization of the epileptogenic zone is not yet well defined., New Method: We recorded simultaneous high-density EEG (HD-EEG) and stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) during interictal periods in 8 patients affected by drug-resistant focal epilepsy. We identified IEDs in the SEEG and systematically analyzed the time-locked signals on the EEG by means of evoked potentials, topographical analysis and Electrical Source Imaging (ESI). The dataset has been standardized and is being publicly shared., Results: Our results showed that IEDs that were not clearly visible at single-trials could be uncovered by averaging, in line with previous reports. They also showed that their topographical voltage distributions matched the position of the SEEG electrode where IEDs had been identified, and that ESI techniques can reconstruct it with an accuracy of ∼2 cm. Finally, the present dataset provides a reference to test the accuracy of different methods and parameters., Comparison With Existing Methods: Our study is the first to systematically compare ESI methods on simultaneously recorded IEDs, and to share a public resource with in-vivo data for their evaluation., Conclusions: Simultaneous HD-EEG and SEEG recordings can unveil hidden IEDs whose origins can be reconstructed using topographical and ESI analyses, but results depend on the selected methods and parameters., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Marcello Massimini is co-founder and shareholder of Intrinsic Powers. Simone Russo is the Chief Medical Officer of Manava Plus. All other authors report no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), and intracerebral stereotaxic EEG (SEEG) are the three neurophysiological recording techniques, which are thought to capture the same type of brain activity. Still, the relationships between non-invasive (EEG, MEG) and invasive (SEEG) signals remain to be further investigated. In early attempts at comparing SEEG with either EEG or MEG, the recordings were performed separately for each modality. However such an approach presents substantial limitations in terms of signal analysis. The goal of this technical note is to investigate the feasibility of simultaneously recording these three signal modalities (EEG, MEG and SEEG), and to provide strategies for analyzing this new kind of data. Intracerebral electrodes were implanted in a patient with intractable epilepsy for presurgical evaluation purposes. This patient was presented with a visual stimulation paradigm while the three types of signals were simultaneously recorded. The analysis started with a characterization of the MEG artifact caused by the SEEG equipment. Next, the average evoked activities were computed at the sensor level, and cortical source activations were estimated for both the EEG and MEG recordings; these were shown to be compatible with the spatiotemporal dynamics of the SEEG signals. In the average time-frequency domain, concordant patterns between the MEG/EEG and SEEG recordings were found below the 40 Hz level. Finally, a fine-grained coupling between the amplitudes of the three recording modalities was detected in the time domain, at the level of single evoked responses. Importantly, these correlations have shown a high level of spatial and temporal specificity. These findings provide a case for the ability of trimodal recordings (EEG, MEG, and SEEG) to reach a greater level of specificity in the investigation of brain signals and functions., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

IInvestigating cognitive brain functions using non-invasive electrophysiology can be challenging due to the particularities of the task-related EEG activity, the depth of the activated brain areas, and the extent of the networks involved. Stereoelectroencephalographic (SEEG) investigations in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy offer an extraordinary opportunity to validate information derived from non-invasive recordings at macro-scales. The SEEG approach can provide brain activity with high spatial specificity during tasks that target specific cognitive processes (e.g., memory). Full validation is possible only when performing simultaneous scalp SEEG recordings, which allows recording signals in the exact same brain state. This is the approach we have taken in 12 subjects performing a visualmemory task that requires the recognition of previously viewed objects. The intracranial signals on 965 contact pairs have been compared to 391 simultaneously recorded scalp signals at a regional and whole-brain level, using multivariate pattern analysis. The results show that the task conditions are best captured by intracranial sensors, despite the limited spatial coverage of SEEG electrodes, compared to the whole-brain non-invasive recordings. Applying beamformer source reconstruction or independent component analysis does not result in an improvement of the multivariate task decoding performance using surface sensor data. By analyzing a joint scalp and SEEG dataset, we investigated whether the two types of signals carry complementary information that might improve the machine-learning classifier performance. This joint analysis revealed that the results are driven by the modality exhibiting best individual performance, namely SEEG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simultaneous noninvasive and invasive electrophysiological recordings provide a unique opportunity to achieve a comprehensive understanding of human brain activity, much like a Rosetta stone for human neuroscience. In this review we focus on the increasingly-used powerful combination of intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) with scalp electroencephalography (EEG) or magnetoencephalography (MEG). We first provide practical insight on how to achieve these technically challenging recordings. We then provide examples from clinical research on how simultaneous recordings are advancing our understanding of epilepsy. This is followed by the illustration of how human neuroscience and methodological advances could benefit from these simultaneous recordings. We conclude with a call for open data sharing and collaboration, while ensuring neuroethical approaches and argue that only with a true collaborative approach the promises of simultaneous recordings will be fulfilled. • Complementary views of simultaneous scalp EEG / MEG and intracranial EEG in humans. • Simultaneous recordings are advancing our understanding of epilepsy. • Simultaneous recordings are improving our understanding of human neuroscience. • Simultaneous recordings provide a ground truth for source localization. • Data sharing within neuroethical boundaries is essential to advance the field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]