Search

Contraction of the orbicularis oculi muscle in response to a sudden Loud sound (acoustic startle response) and the N1/P2 component of the auditory evoked potential are both attenuated when a brief Low-intensity stimulus is presented 30-500 ms before the 'startle-eliciting' stimulus (PPI). Here, we report the effects of the 'atypical' antipsychotic drug quetiapine and the 'conventional' antipsychotic haloperidol on these responses. Sixteen males (aged 19-38 years) participated in four sessions at 7-day intervals, in which they received quetiapine 12.5 mg, quetiapine 25 mg, haloperidol 3 mg and placebo, according to a balanced double-blind design. Electromyographic (EMG) responses of the orbicularis oculi muscle and N1/P2 auditory evoked potentials were recorded in a 20-min session, 2 h after treatment. Subjects received 40 trials in which 1-kHz sounds were presented: (i) 40 ms, 115 dB ('pulse atone' trials) and (ii) 40 ms, 85 dB, followed after 120 ms by 40 ms, 115 dB ('prepulse/pulse' trials). Mean amplitudes of the EMG response and the N1/P2 potential were derived from the pulse-alone trials and, in each case, percentage PPI was calculated. Serum prolactin was measured after each treatment, and autonomic (heart rate, blood pressure, salivation) and psychological (visual analogue self-ratings of mood and alertness, critical flicker fusion frequency) measures were taken before and after each treatment. Quetiapine 12.5 mg and 25 mg significantly reduced the amplitude of the EMG response without altering its inhibition by prepulses; haloperidol had no effect on EMG response amplitude or PPI. Neither drug affected N1/P2 amplitude or PPI of this response. Quetiapine, but not haloperidol, reduced subjective alertness and critical flicker fusion frequency. Haloperidol, but not quetiapine, elevated serum prolactin level. The ability of quetiapine to attenuate the startle response may reflect its sedative action. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Contraction of the orbicularis oculi muscle in response to a sudden loud sound (acoustic startle response) and the N1/P2 component of the auditory evoked potential are both attenuated when a brief low-intensity stimulus is presented 30-500 ms before the 'startle-eliciting' stimulus (prepulse inhibition). Here, we report the effects of the serotonin (5-HT)2 receptor antagonist ketanserin and the D2 dopamine receptor blocking antipsychotic drug haloperidol on these responses. Fifteen males (aged 18-35 years) participated in four sessions at 7-day intervals, in which they received ketanserin 20 mg, ketanserin 40 mg, haloperidol 3 mg and placebo, according to a balanced double-blind design. Electromyographic (EMG) responses of the orbicularis oculi muscle and N1/P2 auditory evoked potentials were recorded in a 20-min session, 3 h after ingestion of haloperidol or 1 h after ingestion of ketanserin. Subjects received 40 trials in which 1-kHz sounds were presented: (i) 40 ms, 115 dB ('pulse alone' trials), and (ii) 40 ms, 85 dB, followed after 120 ms by 40 ms, 115 dB ('prepulse/pulse' trials). Mean amplitudes of the EMG response and the N1/P2 potential were derived from the pulse-alone trials and, in each case, percentage prepulse inhibition was calculated. Serum prolactin was measured after each treatment, and autonomic (heart rate, blood pressure, salivation) and psychological (visual analogue self-ratings of mood and alertness, critical flicker fusion frequency) measures were taken before and after each treatment. Ketanserin 40 mg significantly reduced the amplitude of the EMG response and both doses of ketanserin significantly suppressed prepulse inhibition of the response; haloperidol had no effect on EMG response amplitude or prepulse inhibition. Neither drug affected N1/P2 amplitude or prepulse inhibition of this response. Ketanserin, but not haloperidol, reduced subjective alertness and critical flicker fusion frequency. Haloperidol, but not ketanserin, elevated serum prolactin level. These results confirm that prepulse inhibition of the startle response and of the N1/P2 complex have different pharmacological sensitivities. The ability of ketanserin to attenuate the startle response may reflect its sedative action, as other drugs with sedative properties have also been found to attenuate the startle response in man. The ability of ketanserin to suppress prepulse inhibition of the startle response is consistent with previous evidence for the involvement of 5-HTergic mechanisms in the regulation of prepulse inhibition in man. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Contraction of the orbicularis oculi muscle in response to a sudden loud sound (acoustic startle response) and the N1/P2 component of the auditory evoked potential are both attenuated when a brief low-intensity stimulus is presented 30-500 ms before the 'startle-eliciting' stimulus (prepulse inhibition). Here, we report the effects of the 'conventional' antipsychotic drug haloperidol and the 'atypical' antipsychotic clozapine on these responses. Fifteen males (aged 19-54 years) participated in four sessions at 7-day intervals, in which they received clozapine 3 mg, clozapine 6 mg, haloperidol 3 mg and placebo, according to a balanced double-blind design. Electromyographic (EMG) responses of the orbicularis oculi muscle and N1/P2 auditory evoked potentials were recorded in a 20-min session, 3 h after treatment. Subjects received 40 trials in which 1-kHz sounds were presented: (i) 40 ms, 115 dB ('pulse alone' trials) and (ii) 40 ms, 85 dB, followed after 120 ms by 40 ms, 115 dB ('prepulse/pulse' trials). Mean amplitudes of the EMG response and the N1/P2 potential were derived from the pulse-alone trials and, in each case, percentage prepulse inhibition was calculated. Serum prolactin was measured after each treatment, and autonomic (heart rate, blood pressure, salivation) and psychological (visual analogue self-ratings of mood and alertness, critical flicker fusion frequency) measures were taken before and after each treatment. Clozapine 6 mg significantly reduced the amplitude of the EMG response without altering its inhibition by prepulses. Clozapine 6 mg did not affect the amplitude of the N1/P2 potential, but significantly attenuated prepulse inhibition of that response. Clozapine 3 mg and haloperidol had no significant effect on either response. Clozapine 3 mg and 6 mg, but not haloperidol, reduced subjective alertness and critical flicker fusion frequency. Clozapine 6 mg reduced salivation. Haloperidol, but not clozapine, elevated serum prolactin levels. These results confirm that prepulse inhibition of the startle response and of the N1/P2 complex have different pharmacological sensitivities. The abililty of clozapine to attenuate the startle response may reflect its sedative action. The basis of the abililty of clozapine to suppress prepulse inhibition of the N1/P2 potential remains uncertain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]