1. High-precision measurement of the mass difference between 102Pd and 102Ru.
- Author
-
Nesterenko, D.A., Canete, L., Eronen, T., Jokinen, A., Kankainen, A., Novikov, Yu.N., Rinta-Antila, S., de Roubin, A., and Vilen, M.
- Subjects
- *
MASS spectrometers , *ATOMIC mass , *NUCLIDES , *ELECTRON capture , *IONS - Abstract
Highlights • The submitted manuscript describes the measurement of mass difference between Pd 102 and Ru 102 performed with the Penning-trap mass spectrometer JYFLTRAP. • A very careful evaluation on the atomic mass difference of the pair Pd 102 – Ru 102 in the Atomic Mass Evaluation based on the analysis of full bulk of spectroscopy information for nearest nuclides showed a dramatic deviation of more than 10 σ with the mass measurement performed at the SHIPTRAP Penning trap. • Since the evaluated mass difference was obtained via numerous local connections in β- and electron capture decays and very precise (n , γ) data which agree with each other perfectly, the reliability of the SHIPTRAP measurement was challenged. • To solve the problem, the measurement of the mass difference Pd 102 – Ru 102 has been undertaken at the JYFLTRAP Penning-trap setup using both the Time-of-Flight and the Phase-Imaging Ion Cyclotron Resonance techniques. • The obtained result is around 8 times more precise and in excellent agreement with the value obtained at SHIPTRAP. This agreement manifests the reliability of the Penning trap mass spectrometry. Abstract The Q -value for the neutrinoless double electron capture on 102Pd, Q ϵϵ (102Pd), is determined as the atomic mass difference between 102Pd and 102Ru. A precise measurement of the Q ϵϵ (102Pd) at the SHIPTRAP Penning trap showed a more than 10 σ deviation to the adopted Atomic Mass Evaluation (AME) value. The reliability of the SHIPTRAP measurement was challenged because the AME value was based on numerous experiments including β and electron capture decays and very precise (n , γ) data, all agreeing with each other. To solve the discrepancy, the Q ϵϵ (102Pd) has now been determined with the JYFLTRAP Penning trap at the IGISOL facility in the Accelerator Laboratory of the University of Jyväskylä. The measurement was performed both with the Time-of-Flight and the Phase-Imaging Ion Cyclotron Resonance techniques. The obtained result, Q ϵϵ (102Pd) = 1203.472(45) keV, is eight times more precise and agrees well with the value obtained at SHIPTRAP, Q ϵϵ (102Pd) = 1203.27(36) keV, confirming that 102Pd is not a good candidate for a search for neutrinoless double-electron capture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF