Search

Precipitation into the atmosphere is one of the main processes by which high energy electrons trapped in Earth's inner magnetosphere are lost from the system. Precipitating electrons can affect the chemical composition of the atmosphere and provide insight into the complex dynamics of the Van Allen radiation belts. This study compares energetic electron precipitation measurements at low‐Earth‐orbit by the Focused Investigations of Relativistic Electron Burst Intensity, Range, and Dynamics (FIREBIRD‐II) CubeSats with NOAA Polar‐orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite (POES) and ESA Meteorological Operational satellite (MetOp) satellites, which are equipped with the Medium‐Energy Proton Electron Detector (MEPED). The analysis considers 51 high quality conjunction events at >300 keV during times of low to moderate geomagnetic activity. The spacecraft capture similar electron flux variability, and FIREBIRD‐II observations fall between POES/MetOp 0° $0{}^{\circ}$ and 90° $90{}^{\circ}$ telescopes, likely a result of FIREBIRD‐II sampling both precipitating and mirrored electrons due to uncertainties in pointing direction. Results demonstrate the value of high‐resolution differential energy observations of electron precipitation by low‐cost CubeSats such as FIREBIRD‐II, especially during periods of low flux. Plain Language Summary: Charged particles trapped in the Van Allen Radiation Belts, which mostly originate from the solar wind, interact with Earth's magnetic field and contribute to complex behaviors within the magnetosphere. These interactions include, but are not limited to, the presence of aurora borealis, the destruction of ozone in the upper atmosphere, and satellite drag. This study focuses on electron precipitation, which is a phenomenon that occurs when electrons previously trapped in the radiation belts enter the upper atmosphere. The longest known energetic electron precipitation measurements are conducted by the NOAA POES and ESA MetOp satellites. This study compares FIREBIRD‐II CubeSat data to the POES and MetOp satellites when the spacecraft are passing over similar locations. The cost‐effective FIREBIRD‐II CubeSat observations provide general agreement with the more extensive POES and MetOp observations. FIREBIRD‐II observations are uniquely beneficial as the CubeSats provide high‐resolution measurements unseen by the POES and MetOp satellites during times of low flux. Key Points: FIREBIRD‐II energetic electron observations show similar structure when compared to MEPEDThe wide sampling cone of FIREBIRD‐II measures larger regions of the loss cone and lower fluxCost‐effective CubeSats like FIREBIRD‐II are valuable for quantifying electron precipitation, even during low magnetospheric activity [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Microbursts are impulsive (<1 s) injections of electrons into the atmosphere, thought to be caused by nonlinear scattering by chorus waves. Although attempts have been made to quantify their contribution to outer belt electron loss, the uncertainty in the overall size and duration of the microburst region is typically large, so that their contribution to outer belt loss is uncertain. We combine datasets that measure chorus waves (Van Allen Probes [RBSP], Arase, ground‐based VLF stations) and microburst (>30 keV) precipitation (FIREBIRD II and AC6 CubeSats, POES) to determine the size of the microburst‐producing chorus source region beginning on 5 December 2017. We estimate that the long‐lasting (∼30 hr) microburst‐producing chorus region extends from 4 to 8 Δ ${\Delta}$MLT and 2–5 Δ ${\Delta}$L. We conclude that microbursts likely represent a major loss source of outer radiation belt electrons for this event. Plain Language Summary: Microbursts are short‐duration (<1 s) bursts of electrons that precipitate from the magnetosphere into the atmosphere. Microbursts are thought to be a result of scattering by a plasma wave called chorus. Attempts have been made to understand the contribution microburst precipitation has on electron loss, which helps the outer radiation belt recover after enhancements during storms. The contribution depends on the overall size and duration of the microburst region. We combine datasets that measure chorus waves and microburst precipitation to determine the size and duration of a microburst region beginning on 5 December 2017. Our results show that microbursts are likely a significant source of electron loss. Key Points: We use multipoint observations to estimate the size of a long‐lasting microburst‐producing chorus region beginning on 5 December 2017We estimate that the microburst‐producing chorus region for this event extends from 4 to 8 Δ ${\Delta}$MLT and 2–5 Δ ${\Delta}$LMicroburst precipitation from this event likely constitutes a major source of electron loss from the outer radiation belt [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Precipitating auroral and radiation belt electrons are considered to play an important part in the natural forcing of the middle atmosphere with a possible impact on the climate system. Recent studies suggest that this forcing is underestimated in current chemistry-climate models. The HEPPA III intercomparison experiment is a collective effort to address this point. In this study, we apply electron ionization rates from three data-sets in four chemistry-climate models during a geomagnetically active period in April 2010. Results are evaluated by comparison with observations of nitric oxide (NO) in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere. Differences between the ionization rate data-sets have been assessed in a companion study. In the lower thermosphere, NO densities differ by up to one order of magnitude between models using the same ionization rate data-sets due to differences in the treatment of NO formation, model climatology, and model top height. However, a good agreement in the spatial and temporal variability of NO with observations lends confidence that the electron ionization is represented well above 80 km. In the mesosphere, the averages of model results from all chemistry-climate models differ consistently with the differences in the ionization-rate data-sets, but are within the spread of the observations, so no clear assessment on their comparative validity can be provided. However, observed enhanced amounts of NO in the mid-mesosphere below 70 km suggest a relevant contribution of the high-energy tail of the electron distribution to the hemispheric NO budget during and after the geomagnetic storm on April 6. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Precipitating auroral and radiation belt electrons are considered an important part of the natural forcing of the climate system. Recent studies suggest that this forcing is underestimated in current chemistryclimate models. The High Energy Particle Precipitation in the Atmosphere III intercomparison experiment is a collective effort to address this point. Here, eight different estimates of medium energy electron (MEE) (>30 keV) ionization rates are assessed during a geomagnetic active period in April 2010. The objective is to understand the potential uncertainty related to the MEE energy input. The ionization rates are all based on the Medium Energy Proton and Electron Detector (MEPED) on board the NOAA/POES and EUMETSAT/MetOp spacecraft series. However, different data handling, ionization rate calculations, and background atmospheres result in a wide range of mesospheric electron ionization rates. Although the eight data sets agree well in terms of the temporal variability, they differ by about an order of magnitude in ionization rate strength both during geomagnetic quiet and disturbed periods. The largest spread is found in the aftermath of enhanced geomagnetic activity. Furthermore, governed by different energy limits, the atmospheric penetration depth varies, and some differences related to latitudinal coverage are also evident. The mesospheric NO densities simulated with the Whole Atmospheric Community Climate Model driven by highest and lowest ionization rates differ by more than a factor of eight. In a follow-up study, the atmospheric responses are simulated in four chemistry-climate models (CCM) and compared to satellite observations, considering both the CCM structure and the ionization forcing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The atmospheric effects of precipitating electrons are not fully understood, and uncertainties are large for electrons with energies greater than ~30 keV. These electrons are underrepresented in modeling studies today, primarily because valid measurements of their precipitating spectral energy fluxes are lacking. This paper compares simulations from the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (WACCM) that incorporated two different estimates of precipitating electron fluxes for electrons with energies greater than 30 keV. The estimates are both based on data from the Polar Orbiting Environmental Satellite Medium Energy Proton and Electron Detector (MEPED) instruments but differ in several significant ways. Most importantly, only one of the estimates includes both the 0° and 90° telescopes from the MEPED instrument. Comparisons are presented between the WACCM results and satellite observations poleward of 30°S during the austral winter of 2003, a period of significant energetic electron precipitation. Both of the model simulations forced with precipitating electrons with energies >30 keV match the observed descent of reactive odd nitrogen better than a baseline simulation that included auroral electrons, but no higher energy electrons. However, the simulation that included both telescopes shows substantially better agreement with observations, particularly at midlatitudes. The results indicate that including energies >30 keV and the full range of pitch angles to calculate precipitating electron fluxes is necessary for improving simulations of the atmospheric effects of energetic electron precipitation. Plain Language Summary: The study presented here investigates the effects from energetic electron precipitation (EEP) in the southern hemisphere winter of 2003. Electron precipitation is common during periods of enhanced geomagnetic activity and can create reactive nitrogen oxides and hydrogen oxides that can destroy ozone. Most global climate models currently do not include precipitating electrons with energies greater than 30 keV. To test whether this deficiency is important, this investigation compares observations with model simulations that included electrons with energies greater than 30 keV, as observed by the Medium Energy Proton and Electron Detector (MEPED) satellite instruments. In addition, one of the EEP data sets used in the simulations included data from just one of the telescopes on the MEPED instruments, whereas the other included data from both of the telescopes. We found that including both of the telescopes is important for capturing chemistry changes at polar and subpolar latitudes. The model simulation that only included only one of the telescopes showed significant improvement compared to a simulation with only low energy electrons. However, it did not perform as well as the model simulation that included both MEPED telescopes. This work is important because it shows that including energies >30 keV and the full range of precipitating electron pitch angles is necessary to show the impact electrons have on the atmosphere and provides an EEP data set for use in future model simulations. Key Points: Effects of energetic electron precipitation in southern hemisphere 2003 simulated with Whole Atmosphere Community Climate ModelSimulations of middle atmosphere chemistry improve significantly by including >30‐keV precipitating electronsIncluding the full range of pitch angles is necessary to capture precipitating electron impacts at subpolar latitudes [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]