Search

The current discourse around Open Science has tended to focus on the creation of new technological platforms and tools to facilitate sharing and reuse of a wide range of research outputs. There is an assumption that once these new tools are in place, researchers—and at times, members of the general public—will be able to participate in the creation of scientific knowledge in more accessible and efficient ways. While many of these new tools have indeed assisted in the ease of collaboration through online spaces and mechanisms, the narrowness of how infrastructure is imagined by open science practitioners tends to put the use of technology ahead of the issues that people are actually trying to solve, while failing to acknowledge the systemic constraints that exist within and between some communities. Drawing on an analytical framework grounded in Black feminist intersectionality (Noble, “A Future”), this paper highlights the need for more inclusive knowledge infrastructures, particularly in the context of fair and sustainable development. Three case studies from the Open and Collaborative Science in Development Network (OCSDNet), are outlined in order to illustrate the importance of moving beyond a definition of infrastructure as merely a technical or physical entity. These cases, arising from research conducted in South Africa, Brazil and the Caribbean, demonstrate how more sustainable and nuanced forms of collaboration and participation may be enabled through broader understandings of knowledge infrastructures. This paper further argues that leveraging the feminist concept of intersectionality when conceptualizing the development of knowledge infrastructures could be one way to move from narrow assumptions about standardized knowledge “users” towards more inclusive reimaginings of how a plurality of knowledge can be produced and shared via networked technologies.

Scholarly communication and publishing are increasingly taking place in the electronic environment. With a growing proportion of the scholarly record now existing only in digital format, serious and pressing issues regarding access and preservation are being raised that are central to future scholarship. At the same time, the desire of scholars to maximize readership of their research and to take control of the scholarly communication process back from the restrictive domain of commercial publishing has prompted the proliferation of access options and experimental models of publishing. This paper examines the emerging trend of university-based institutional repositories (IRs) designed to capture the scholarly output of an institution and to maximize the research impact of this output. The relationship of this trend to the open access movement is dis- cussed and challenges and opportunities for using IRs to promote new modes of scholarship are provided. Resume : La communication et l'edition savantes ont de plus en plus lieu dans un milieu electronique. En effet, une proportion croissante de la recherche existe seulement sous forme numerique. Cette situation souleve des questions serieuses et pressantes sur l'acces et la preservation qui sont vitales pour l'erudition future. En meme temps, les desirs de chercheurs de maximiser leur lectorat et de retirer la communication savante de l'emprise des editeurs commerciaux ont mene a une proliferation d'options pour l'acces et de modeles d'edition experimentaux. Cet article examine la tendance emergeante vers des entrepots institutionnels bases dans des universites concus de maniere a preserver la production savante d'une institution et a maximiser son impact sur la recherche. Cet article discute du rapport de cette tendance au mouvement favorisant un acces libre et il propose des defis et des occasions dans l'utilisation d'entrepots institutionnels pour pro- mouvoir de nouvelles approches erudites.

Bioline was set up in 1993 as a result of an increasingly loud rumble of dissatisfaction among scientists about the way research information was (or was not) distributed. The rumble reached a crescendo at a biotechnology/ bioinformatics conference in Trieste, Italy at which Professor Joshua Lederberg (winner of the 1958 Noble Prize in Medicine) deplored the growing gap between the cost of learned journals and the budgets of libraries to purchase them (Branin and Case, 1998). This problem was recognised as being particularly pronounced for research institutions in developing countries (Ginsparg, 1996). At the same time, the appearance of a possible means of using information technology and communications (ICT) set the research community thinking that there may, just possibly, be a low cost solution in sight. Some of us had been collaborating as working scientists on online databases and had some experience in the use of electronic communication. We had skills in database development, in software development and in serving on editorial boards of various biological journals during the normal course of our academic careers. We had contacts in the international scientific community and in the publishing world. As scientists, we also knew what scientists wanted. Perhaps we had enough collective knowledge to do something constructive to test the electronic publishing water. On the negative side, we had little experience of the likely impact of the new technologies on the distribution of scientific research; we knew little about the likely response from the scientific community to a novel method of accessing research information. We also had no idea of the consequences of e-publishing on the economics of journal publishing. Would we become millionaires or debtors? We decided to test the water. This article describes the progress of Bioline Publications from birth to the present time and draws some conclusions from our experience.

Finding experts in academics is an important practical problem, e.g. recruiting reviewersfor reviewing conference, journal or project submissions, partner matching for researchproposals, finding relevant M. Sc. or Ph. D. supervisors etc. In this work, we discuss anexpertise recommender system that is built on data extracted from the Blekinge Instituteof Technology (BTH) instance of the institutional repository system DiVA (DigitalScientific Archive). DiVA is a publication and archiving platform for research publicationsand student essays used by 46 publicly funded universities and authorities in Sweden andthe rest of the Nordic countries (www.diva-portal.org). The DiVA classification system isbased on the Swedish Higher Education Authority (UKÄ) and the Statistic Sweden's (SCB)three levels classification system. Using the classification terms associated with studentM. Sc. and B. Sc. theses published in the DiVA platform, we have developed a prototypesystem which can be used to identify and recommend subject thesis supervisors inacademy. open access

International audience; In the World Wide Web, a very large number of resources is made available through digital libraries. The existence of many individual digital libraries, maintained by different organizations, brings challenges to the discoverability, sharing and reuse of the resources. A widely-used approach is metadata aggregation, where centralized efforts like Europeana facilitate the discoverability and use of the resources by collecting their associated metadata. The cultural heritage domain embraced the aggregation approach while, at the same time, the technological landscape kept evolving. Nowadays, cultural heritage institutions are increasingly applying technologies designed for the wider interoperability on the Web. This paper presents a study of the current application by cultural heritage data providers of technological solutions in use for making structured metadata available for re-use in the Internet. We investigated the use of both linked data and technologies related with indexing of resources by Internet search engines. We have conducted a harvesting experiment of the landing pages from websites of digital libraries that participate in Europeana, and collected statistics about the usage these particular technologies. These technologies allow for representing structured data within HTML, or for structured data to be referred to by links within HTML or through HTTP headers capabilities. We conclude with a discussion of future work for establishing a solution for cultural heritage aggregation based on the current situation and the available technologies.

International audience; The aim of this paper is to present the Centre Mersenne for Open Scientific Publishing, a new open access scientific publishing infrastructure for publications written in LaTeX.The Centre Mersenne was launched in January 2018 with the first volume of the newly-created journal Algebraic Combinatorics.This non-profit initiative hosted by French public institutions was created to address a growing need within the scientific community for alternative solutions simultaneously scalable, sustainable, trustworthy, of high quality and at fair price.The Centre Mersenne supports publications such as journals, books and proceedings from any scientific discipline, provided they are written in LaTeX and engaged towards Diamond open access.