Search

Purpose: Trauma care poses many challenges in small hospitals in rural settings. This report was designed to assess the role of a rural general surgeon with trauma patients., Methods: A cohort study was designed using a retrospective analysis of a cohort at Bozkır Community Hospital that included trauma patients admitted to the emergency department between June 2007 and May 2009. The patients of group 1 were those treated during the first year of the study period, when the hospital staff was only non-specialist physicians. In the second year, a general surgeon was added to the staff, and the patients from this period constituted group 2., Results: The top three leading causes of injuries were falls (46.5 %), piercing/cutting injuries (38.2 %), and assault (6.5 %). The frequency of trauma due to falls was higher in group 1, and assault and piercing/cutting injuries were higher in group 2 (p < 0.001 for each). The percentage of discharged and transferred patients was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.065 and p = 0.082, respectively). Similar mortality rates were also detected (group 1: 0.5 %, group 2: 0.3 %, p = 0.479)., Conclusions: The presence of a solo general surgeon was not found to be adequate for improving the outcome for trauma patients in a rural hospital.

Purpose: As an increasing amount of penetrating abdominal stab injuries has been observed in the last few decades, it is important to evaluate the adequacy of the medical systems and surgical education and training to handle this type of injury. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of patients with penetrating abdominal stab injuries admitted to the Emergency Unit and to evaluate the effects of using a new treatment algorithm. Methods: From January 2009 to April 2009, a standardized education and training system for the surgical team was implemented in order to improve the emergency medical care system. From April 2009 to April 2011, 106 patients with the diagnosis of a penetrating abdominal stab injury were prospectively included in the study. Results: The cohort included 98 males and the mean age was 29.40 ± 10.9 years. Eighty-two percent of the patients were managed conservatively, whereas 18 % underwent surgery. Based on the surgical outcomes of the patients, the rate of negative, non-therapeutic, and therapeutic laparotomies was 5, 11, and 84 %, respectively. No statistically significant difference between patients who did and did not receive surgery was observed with regards to blood pressure, temperature, hematocrit, hemoglobin, and C-reactive protein (CRP) values. However, a statistically significant difference was observed in the pulse rate, leukocyte, and neutrophil counts. The mortality and morbidity rates were 0.94 and 3.77 %, respectively. Conclusions: Selective non-operative management, which has been standardized in trauma centers, may be carefully utilized in order to treat penetrating abdominal stab wounds with caution in well-equipped medical centers with well-trained staff. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]