Search

To estimate the cumulative incidence of functional decline over 6 months following emergency department (ED) assessments of nonhospitalized injuries and to identify its main determinants.We conducted a prospective multicenter cohort of older adults discharged home following assessment for injuries in 8 Canadian EDs. Participants were assessed at 3 time points: baseline in the ED, 3 months, and 6 months. The primary outcome, functional decline, was defined as a 2-points loss from baseline on the Older American Resources Scale (OARS). Other measures included demographics, comorbidities, injury characteristics, frailty, cognition, mobility status, etc. Cumulative incidences were estimated using proportions with 95% confidence intervals. Log-binomial regressions and the "least absolute shrinkage and selection operator" (LASSO) were used to identify significant functional decline determinants.Among 2,919 participants, 403 (13.8%) were lost to follow-up. Mean age was 76.2±7.6 years, 65.3% were women, 9% were frail, and 40.0% prefrail. Main injury mechanisms were falls (65.5%) and motor vehicle accidents (18.6%). The cumulative incidence of functional decline over 6 months was 17.0% (95% confidence interval 12.5% to 23.0%). Occasional use of walking devices, less than 5 outings/week, frailty, and older age were significant baseline determinants of functional decline.A significant 17% of older adults with "minor" injuries experience a persistent functional decline over 6 months following their ED visit. Four frailty-related determinants were identified: occasional use of a walking device, less than 5 outings/week, frailty, and older age. Further work is needed to assess if these can help ED clinicians screen seniors at risk and initiate interventions at discharge.

Treatment of acute pain after emergency department (ED) discharge remains a challenge in the opioid crisis context. Our objective was to determine the proportion of patients using opioid vs non-opioid pain medication following discharge from the ED with acute pain, and the association of type of pain medication with average pain intensity before pain medication intake and report of pain relief.This was a prospective cohort study of ED patients aged ≥ 18 years with an acute pain (≤ 2 weeks) who were discharged with an opioid prescription. Patients completed a 14-day diary assessing daily pain intensity level before each pain medication intake (0-10 numeric rating scale), type of pain medication use (opioid vs non-opioid), and if pain was relieved by the medication used that day. Multilevel analyses were used to compare the effect of type of analgesic used on pain intensity and relief.A total of 381 participants completed the 14-day diary; 50% were women and median age was 54 years (IQR = 43-66). Average daily pain intensity before pain medication intake was significantly higher for patients who used opioids (5.9; 95% CI 5.7-6.2) as compared to non-opioid analgesics (4.2; 95% CI 4.0-4.5) or no pain medication (2.2; 95% CI 1.9-2.5). Controlling for pain intensity, patients using opioids were more likely to report a pain relief (OR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.8) as compared to those who used non-opioid analgesics.Overall, opioids appear to be effective and used as intended by the prescribing physician.RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Le traitement de la douleur aiguë après la sortie des départements d’urgence (DU) reste un défi dans le contexte de la crise des opioïdes. Notre objectif était de déterminer la proportion de patients utilisant des analgésiques opioïdes par rapport aux analgésiques non opioïdes après leur sortie des urgences avec une douleur aiguë, et l'association du type d'analgésique avec l'intensité moyenne de la douleur avant la prise d'analgésiques et le soulagement de la douleur rapporté. LES MéTHODES: Il s'agissait d'une étude de cohorte prospective de patients (DU) âgés de ≥18 ans souffrant de douleurs aiguës (≤ 2 semaines) et ayant reçu une ordonnance d'opioïdes à leur sortie de l'hôpital. Les patients ont rempli un journal de 14 jours évaluant le niveau d'intensité de la douleur quotidienne avant chaque prise de médicaments anti-douleur (échelle d'évaluation numérique de 0 à 10), le type d'utilisation des médicaments anti-douleur (opioïdes contre non opioïdes), et si la douleur était soulagée par les médicaments utilisés ce jour-là. Des analyses multiniveaux ont été utilisées pour comparer l'effet du type d'analgésique utilisé sur l'intensité et le soulagement de la douleur. RéSULTATS: Au total, 381 participants ont rempli le journal de 14 jours; 50% étaient des femmes et l'âge médian était de 54 ans (EI = 43–66). L'intensité moyenne de la douleur quotidienne avant la prise d'analgésiques était significativement plus élevée chez les patients qui prenaient des opioïdes (5.9; 95% IC: 5.7–6.2) par rapport aux analgésiques non opioïdes (4.2; 95% IC: 4.0–4.5) ou à l'absence d'analgésiques (2.2; 95% IC: 1.9–2.5). En contrôlant l'intensité de la douleur, les patients utilisant des opioïdes étaient plus susceptibles de déclarer un soulagement de la douleur (OR = 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1−1.8) par rapport à ceux qui utilisaient des analgésiques non opioïdes. CONCLUSION: Dans l'ensemble, les opioïdes semblent être efficaces et utilisés comme prévu par le médecin prescripteur.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the evidence regarding the infection risk associated with different modalities of oxygen therapy used in treating patients with severe acute respiratory infection. Health care workers face significant risk of infection when treating patients with a viral severe acute respiratory infection. To ensure health care worker safety and limit nosocomial transmission of such infection, it is crucial to synthesize the evidence regarding the infection risk associated with different modalities of oxygen therapy used in treating patients with severe acute respiratory infection. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from January 1, 2000, to April 1, 2020, for studies describing the risk of infection associated with the modalities of oxygen therapy used for patients with severe acute respiratory infection. The study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed by independent reviewers. The primary outcome measure was the infection of health care workers with a severe acute respiratory infection. Random-effect models were used to synthesize the extracted data. RESULTS: Of 22,123 citations, 50 studies were eligible for qualitative synthesis and 16 for meta-analysis. Globally, the quality of the included studies provided a very low certainty of evidence. Being exposed or performing an intubation (odds ratio 6.48; 95% confidence interval 2.90 to 14.44), bag-valve-mask ventilation (odds ratio 2.70; 95% confidence interval 1.31 to 5.36), and noninvasive ventilation (odds ratio 3.96; 95% confidence interval 2.12 to 7.40) were associated with an increased risk of infection. All modalities of oxygen therapy generate air dispersion. CONCLUSION: Most modalities of oxygen therapy are associated with an increased risk of infection and none have been demonstrated as safe. The lowest flow of oxygen should be used to maintain an adequate oxygen saturation for patients with severe acute respiratory infection, and manipulation of oxygen delivery equipment should be minimized.

Objectives: The opioid crisis has risen dramatically in North America in the new millennium, due to both illegal and prescription opioid use. While emergency departments (EDs) represent a potentially strategic setting for interventions to reduce harm from opioid use disorder (OUD), the absence of a recent synthesis of literature limits implementation and scalability. To fill this gap, we conducted a systematic review of the literature on interventions targeting opioid use disorders initiated in emergency departments. Methods: Using an explicit search strategy (PROSPERO), the MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, EMBASE and EBM reviews databases were searched from 1980 to October 4, 2019. The grey literature was explored using Google Scholar. Study characteristics were abstracted independently. The methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed. Results: 12 of 2270 studies met the inclusion criteria (two of high quality). In addition to the heterogeneity of the outcome measures used (retention in treatment, opioid consumption, overdose), brief intervention and buprenorphine initiation (6 of 12 studies) were the most documented with mixed effects for the former and positive short-term and confined to single ED sites effects for the latter. Conclusion: EDs can be an appropriate setting for initiating opioid agonist treatment (OAT), but in order to be sustained, it likely needs to be coupled with community-based follow-up and support to ensure longer-term retention. The scarcity of high-quality evidence on OUD interventions initiated in emergency settings highlights the need for future research.

Objectives1) To characterize mild, moderate, and severe fear of falling in older emergency department (ED) patients for minor injuries, and 2) to assess whether fear of falling could predict falls and returns to the ED within 6 months of the initial ED visit.MethodsThis study was part of the Canadian Emergency and Trauma Initiative (CETI) prospective cohort (2011–2016). Patients ages ≥ 65, who were independent in their basic daily activities and who were discharged from the ED after consulting for a minor injury, were included. Fear of falling was measured by the Short Falls Efficacy Scale International (SFES-I) in order to stratify fear of falling as mild (SFES-I = 7-8/28), moderate (SFES-I = 9-13/28), or severe (SFES-I = 14-28/28). Many other physical and psychological characteristics where collected. Research assistants conducted follow-up phone interviews at 3 and 6 months’ post-ED visit, in which patients were asked to report returns to the ED.ResultsA total of 2,899 patients were enrolled and 2,009 had complete data at 6 months. Patients with moderate to severe fear of falling were more likely to be of ages ≥ 75, female, frailer with multiple comorbidities, and decreased mobility. Higher baseline fear of falling increased the risk of falling at 3 and 6 months (odds ratio [OR]-moderate-fear of falling: 1.63, p < 0.05, OR-severe-fear of falling 2.37, p < 0.05). Fear of falling positive predictive values for return to the ED or future falls were 7.7% to 17%.ConclusionAlthough a high fear of falling is associated with increased risk of falling within 6 months of a minor injury in older patients, fear of falling considered alone was not shown to be a strong predictor of return to the ED and future falls.

Emergency department (ED) stay and its associated conditions (immobility, inadequate hydration and nutrition, lack of stimulation) increase the risk of delirium in older patients. Poorly controlled pain and paradoxically opioid pain treatment have also been identified as triggers for delirium. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between pain, opioid treatment, and delirium in older ED patients.A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted in four hospitals across the province of Québec (Canada). Patients aged ≥ 65 years old, waiting for hospital admission between March and July 2015, who were nondelirious upon ED arrival, who were independent or semi-independent in their daily living activities, and who had an ED stay of at least 8 hours were included. Delirium assessments were conducted twice a day during the patient's entire ED stay and their first 24 hours on the hospital ward using the Confusion Assessment Method. Pain intensity was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS = 0-100) during the initial interview, and all opioid treatments were documented.A total of 338 patients were included; 51% were female, and mean (±SD) age was 77 (±8) years. Forty-one patients (12%) experienced delirium during their hospital stay occurring within a mean (±SD) delay of 47 (±19) hours after ED admission. Among patients with pain intensity ≥ 65 from VAS (0-100), 26% experienced delirium compared to 11% for patients with pain 65 (p 0.01), and no significant association was found between opioid consumption and delirium (p = 0.31). Logistic regression controlling for confounding factors showed that patients with pain intensity ≥ 65 are 3.3 (95% confidence interval = 1.4 to 7.9) times more likely to develop delirium than patients who had pain intensity of65.Severe pain, not opioids, is associated with the development of delirium during ED stay. Adequate pain control during the hospital stay may contribute to a decrease in delirium episodes.

Objective Opioid side effects are common when treating chronic pain. However, the frequency of opioid side effects has rarely been examined in acute pain conditions, particularly in a post emergency department (ED) setting. The objective of this study was to evaluate the short-term incidence of opioid-induced side effects (constipation, nausea/vomiting, dizziness, drowsiness, sweating, and weakness) in patients discharged from the ED with an opioid prescription. Methods This is a prospective cohort study of patients aged ≥18 years who visited the ED for an acute pain condition (≤2 weeks) and were discharged with an opioid prescription. Patients completed a 14-day diary assessing daily pain medication use and side effects. Results We recruited 386 patients with a median age of 54 years (IQR:43–66); 50% were women. During the 2-week follow-up, 80% of patients consumed opioids. Among the patients who used opioids, 79% (95%CI:75–83) reported side effects compared to 38% (95%CI:27–49) for non-users. Adjusting for age, sex, and pain condition, patients who used opioids were more likely to report constipation (OR:7.5; 95%CI:3.1–17.9), nausea/vomiting (OR:4.1; 95%CI:1.8–9.5), dizziness (OR:5.4; 95%CI: 2.2–13.2), drowsiness (OR:4.6; 95%CI:2.5–8.7), and weakness (OR:4.2; 95%CI:1.6–11.0) compared to non-users. A dose-response trend was observed for constipation but not for the other side effects. Nausea/vomiting (OR:2.0; 95%CI:1.1–3.6) and dizziness (OR:1.9; 95%CI:1.1–3.4) were more often associated with oxycodone than with morphine. Conclusion As observed for chronic pain treatment, side effects are highly prevalent during short-term opioid treatment for acute pain. Physicians should inform patients about those side effects and should consider prescribing laxatives.

Studies evaluating the prognostic value of the pulseless electrical activity (PEA) heart rate in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients have reported conflicting results. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between the initial PEA heart rate and favorable clinical outcomes for OHCA patients. The present post-hoc cohort study used the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Cardiac Epidemiologic Registry Version 3, which included OHCA patients in seven US and three Canadian sites from April 2011 to June 2015. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge and the secondary outcome was survival with a good functional outcome. For the primary analysis, the patients were separated into eight groups according to their first rhythms and PEA heart rates: (1) initial PEA heart rate of 1-20 beats per minute (bpm); (2) 21-40 bpm; (3) 41-60 bpm; (4) 61-80 bpm; (5) 81-100 bpm; (6) 101-120 bpm; (7) over 120 bpm; (8) initial shockable rhythm (reference category). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the associations of interest. We identified 17,675 patients (PEA: 7,089 [40.1%]; initial shockable rhythm: 10,797 [59.9%]). Patients with initial PEA electrical frequencies ≤100 bpm were less likely to survive to hospital discharge than patients with initial shockable rhythms (1-20 bpm: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.15 [95%CI 0.11-0.21]; 21-40 bpm: AOR = 0.21 [0.18-0.25]; 41-60 bpm: AOR = 0.30 [0.25-0.36]; 61-80 bpm: AOR = 0.37 [0.28-0.49]; 81-100 bpm: AOR = 0.55 [0.41-0.65]). However, there were no statistical outcome differences between PEA patients with initial electrical frequencies of >100 bpm and patients with initial shockable rhythms (101-120 bpm: AOR = 0.65 [95%CI 0.42-1.01]; >120 bpm: AOR = 0.72 [95%CI 0.37-1.39]). Similar results were observed for survival with good functional outcomes (101-120 bpm: AOR = 0.60 [95%CI 0.31-1.15]; >120 bpm: AOR = 1.08 [95%CI 0.50-2.28]). We observed a good association between higher initial PEA electrical frequency and favorable clinical outcomes for OHCA patients. As there is no significant difference in outcomes between patients with initial PEA heart rates of more than 100 bpm and those with initial shockable rhythms, we can hypothesize that these patients could be considered in the same prognostic category.

Currently, there are no Canadian guidelines for discharge instruction to be given to patients receiving an opioid prescription in the ED. This likely contributes to inadequate discharge instructions for these potentially dangerous medications. The principal goal of this study was to develop an interdisciplinary Canadian consensus regarding important concepts to be included in written opioid discharge instructions within the ED setting.We conducted a modified Delphi study between May and August 2021. The national multidisciplinary panel consisted of 23 healthcare professionals and one patient partner. The survey consisted of 19 initial concepts developed after a review of the literature and a meeting with local experts. The panel added four new concepts after the first survey round. Three rounds of online surveys were distributed in total. Panel consensus was defined a priori as a disagreement index score less than 1, in accordance with the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method.We achieved a 100% response rate in round one and a 96% response rate in rounds two and three of our Delphi study. There was group consensus (disagreement index = 0.66, median importance = 9) that all patients receiving opioid prescriptions from the ED should receive written discharge instructions. The interdisciplinary panel arrived at a consensus on 21/23 concepts for ED opioid discharge instructions. The concepts with the highest level of agreement were related to minimizing the use of the prescribed opioid medication and opioid use safety (mixing with drugs/alcohol, storage, and impairment).This Delphi study with a national, multidisciplinary panel achieved consensus on 21 concepts that should be included in written discharge instructions to patients receiving an opioid prescription upon discharge from the ED.RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Actuellement, il n’y a pas de lignes directrices canadiennes sur les instructions de sortie à donner aux patients qui reçoivent une ordonnance d'opioïdes aux urgences. Cela contribue probablement à des instructions de sortie inadéquates pour ces médicaments potentiellement dangereux. L’objectif principal de cette étude était d’établir un consensus canadien interdisciplinaire sur les concepts importants à inclure dans les directives écrites de sortie des opioïdes dans le contexte des urgences. MéTHODES: Nous avons mené une étude Delphi modifiée entre mai et août 2021. Le comité national multidisciplinaire était composé de 23 professionnels de la santé et d’un patient partenaire. L’enquête comprenait 19 concepts initiaux développés après un examen de la littérature et une réunion avec des experts locaux. Le panel a ajouté quatre nouveaux concepts après la première ronde d’enquête. Trois séries de sondages en ligne ont été distribuées au total. Le consensus du panel a été défini a priori comme un indice de désaccord inférieur à 1, conformément à la méthode de pertinence RAND/UCLA. RéSULTATS: Nous avons atteint un taux de réponse de 100 % au premier tour et un taux de réponse de 96 % aux deuxième et troisième tours de notre étude Delphi. Il y avait un consensus de groupe (indice de désaccord = 0,66, importance médiane = 9) sur le fait que tous les patients recevant une ordonnance d'opioïdes aux urgences devraient recevoir des instructions écrites à la sortie de l'hôpital. Le groupe interdisciplinaire est parvenu à un consensus sur les concepts 21/23 pour les instructions de sortie d’opioïdes aux urgences. Les concepts ayant fait l’objet du plus haut niveau d’entente étaient liés à la réduction de l’utilisation des médicaments opioïdes prescrits et à la sécurité de l’utilisation des opioïdes (mélange avec les drogues/alcool, stockage et affaiblissement des facultés). CONCLUSION: Cette étude Delphi avec un panel national multidisciplinaire a permis de parvenir à un consensus sur 21 concepts qui devraient être inclus dans les instructions écrites de sortie aux patients recevant une ordonnance d’opioïdes à leur sortie de l’urgence.

Analgesia with fentanyl can be associated with hyperalgesia (higher sensitivity to pain) and can contribute to escalating opioid use. Our objective was to assess the relationship between emergency department (ED) acute pain management with fentanyl compared to other opioids, and the quantity of opioids consumed two-week after discharge. We hypothesized that the quantity of opioids consumed would be higher for patients treated with fentanyl compared to those treated with other opioids.Patients were selected from two prospective cohorts assessing opioids consumed after ED discharge. Patients ≥18 years treated with an opioid in the ED for an acute pain condition (≤2 weeks) and discharged with an opioid prescription were included. Patients completed a 14-day paper or electronic diary of pain medication use. Quantity of 5 mg morphine equivalent tablets consumed during a 14-day follow-up by patients treated with fentanyl compared to those treated with other opioids during their ED stay were analyzed using a multiple linear regression and propensity scores.We included 707 patients (mean age ± SD: 50 ± 15 years, 47% women) in this study. During follow-up, patients treated with fentanyl (N = 91) during their ED stay consumed a median (IQR) of 5.8 (14) 5 mg morphine equivalent pills compared to 7.0 (14) for those treated with other opioids (p = 0.05). Results were similar using propensity score sensitivity analysis. However, after adjusting for confounding variables, ED fentanyl treatment showed a trend, but not a statistically significant association with a decreased opioid consumption during the 14-day follow-up (B = -2.4; 95%CI = -5.3 to 0.4; p = 0.09).Patients treated with fentanyl during ED stay did not consume more opioids after ED discharge, compared to those treated with other opioids. If fentanyl does cause more hyperalgesia compared to other opioids, it does not seem to have a significant impact on opioid consumption after ED discharge.

Background Emergency departments (EDs) are operating at or above capacity, which has negative consequences on patients in terms of quality of care and morbi-mortality. Redirection strategies for low-acuity ED patients to primary care practices are usually based on subjective eligibility criteria that sometimes necessitate formal medical assessment. Literature investigating the effect of those interventions is equivocal. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety of a redirection process using an electronic clinical support system used by the triage nurse without physician assessment. Methods A single cohort observational study was performed in the ED of a level 1 academic trauma center. All low-acuity patients redirected to nearby clinics through a clinical decision support system (February–August 2017) were included. This system uses different sets of medical prerequisites to identify patients eligible to redirection. Data on safety and patient experience were collected through phone questionnaires on day 2 and 10 after ED visit. The primary endpoint was the rate of redirected patients returning to any ED for an unexpected visit within 48 h. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of 7-day return visit and satisfaction rates. Results A total of 980 redirected low-acuity patients were included over the period: 18 patients (2.8%) returned unexpectedly to an ED within 48 h and 31 patients (4.8%) within 7 days. No hospital admission or death were reported within 7 days following the first ED visit. Among redirected patients, 81% were satisfied with care provided by the clinic staff. Conclusion The implementation of a specific electronic-guided decision support redirection protocol appeared to provide safe deferral to nearby clinics for redirected low-acuity patients. EDs are pivotal elements of the healthcare system pathway and redirection process could represent an interesting tool to improve the care to low-acuity patients.

Background There is variability in the management of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) and abnormal findings on their initial head computed tomography (CT). The main objective of this study was to validate the value of the Important Brain Injury (IBI) criteria, introduced by the Canadian CT-Head Rule, in predicting the need for surgical intervention. The secondary objective was to identify independent predictors for neurosurgical intervention. Methods This is a post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort of adult patients presenting to the ED of one tertiary care, academic center, between 2008 and 2012, with MTBI and an abnormal initial head CT. Neurosurgical intervention was at the discretion of the treating physician. The sensitivity and specificity of the IBI criteria were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI95%). A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify independent predictors for neurosurgical intervention with the direct entry method. Results A total of 678 patients (male = 65.9%, mean age = 62.5 years) were included, of whom 114 (16.8%) required neurosurgical intervention. All patients requiring neurosurgical intervention met IBI criteria on their initial head CT (sensitivity of 100% [CI95% 96.8–100]). However, 368 (65.2%) patients with findings of IBI did not require neurosurgical intervention (specificity of 34.8% [CI95% 30.8–38.8]). Age over 65 was independently associated with neurosurgical intervention in the IBI population. Conclusion The IBI criteria for MTBI identified all patients who required neurosurgical intervention; however its specificity is low.

Background It is documented that health professionals from various settings fail to detect > 50% of delirium cases. Objective This study aimed to describe the proportion of unrecognized incident delirium in five emergency departments (EDs). Secondary objectives were to compare the two groups (recognized/unrecognized) and assess the impact of unrecognized delirium at 60 days regarding 1) unplanned consultations and 2) functional and cognitive decline. Method This is a sub-analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study. Independent patients aged ≥ 65 years who tested negative for delirium on the initial interview with an ED stay ≥ 8 h were enrolled. Patients were assessed twice daily using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and the Delirium Index up to 24 h into hospital admission. Medical records were reviewed to assess whether delirium was recognized or not. Results The main study reported a positive CAM in 68 patients. Three patients’ medical files were incomplete, leaving a sample of 65 patients. Delirium was recognized in 15.4% of our participants. These patients were older (p = 0.03) and female (p = 0.01) but were otherwise similar to those with unrecognized delirium. Delirium Index scores were higher in patients with recognized delirium (p = 0.01) and they experienced a more important functional decline at 60 days (p = 0.02). No association was found between delirium recognition and health care services utilization or decline in cognitive function. Conclusions This study confirms reports of high rates of missed or unrecognized delirium (84.6%) in ED patients compared to routine structured screening using the CAM performed by a research assistant. Patients with recognized delirium were older women with a greater severity of symptoms and experienced a more significant functional decline at 60 days.

Study objective The objective of the study is to evaluate the acute pain intensity evolution in emergency department (ED) discharged patients, using group-based trajectory modeling. This method identifies patient groups with similar profiles of change over time without assuming the existence of a particular pattern or number of groups. Methods This was a prospective cohort study of ED patients aged 18 years or older, with an acute pain condition (≤2 weeks), and discharged with an opioid prescription. Patients completed a 14-day diary assessing daily pain intensity level (numeric rating scale of 0 to 10) and pain medication use. Results Among the 372 included patients, 6 distinct post-ED pain intensity trajectories were identified. Two started with severe levels of pain; one remained with severe pain intensity (12.6% of the sample) and the other ended with a moderate pain intensity level (26.3%). Two other trajectories had severe initial pain; one decreased to mild pain (21.7%) and the other to no pain (13.8%). Another trajectory had moderate initial pain that decreased to a mild level (15.9%) and the last one started with mild pain intensity and had no pain at the end of the 14-day period (9.7%). The pain trajectory patterns were significantly associated with age, type of painful conditions, pain intensity at ED discharge, and opioid consumption. Conclusion Acute pain resolution after an ED visit seems to progress through 6 different trajectory patterns that are more informative than simple linear models and could be useful to adapt acute pain management in future research.

Background It is recommended that older patients undergo systematic mental status screening when presenting to the emergency department (ED). However, the tools available are not necessarily adapted to the ED environment, therefore, quicker and easier tools are needed. Objectives The purpose of this study is to validate the Ottawa 3DY-French (O3DY-F) Scale as a screening tool for delirium and cognitive impairment in a French-speaking cohort. Method This multicenter prospective study was conducted in four hospitals across the province of Quebec. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 65 years, ED stay ≥ 8 h, awaiting admission to a care unit, and independent or semi-independent in their daily living activities. Cognitive status was assessed during the initial interview using the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Screening-modified (TICS-m) and the O3DY-F scale. Comparisons were made between the O3DY-F and the TICS-m and Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the O3DY-F for the detection of cognitive impairment and delirium. Results A total of 313 patients were included in this study, 139 of which had a positive O3DY-F. When compared with the CAM, the O3DY-F had a sensitivity of 84.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 60.4–96.6) and a specificity of 58.2% (95% CI 52.3–63.9) for the detection of prevalent delirium. The O3DY-F had a sensitivity of 76.2% (95% CI 66.7–84.8) and a specificity of 67.6% (95% CI 61.0–73.6) for cognitive impairment (defined as a TICS-m Conclusion The O3DY-F is a useful and effective tool to screen for delirium and undetected cognitive impairment among a French-speaking cohort in the ED.

Aims For out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, the influence of the delay before the initiation of resuscitation, termed the no-flow time (NFT), and duration of bystander-only resuscitation low-flow time (BLFT) on the type of electrical rhythm observed has not been well described. The objective of this study is to determine the relationship between NFT, BLFT and the likelihood of a shockable rhythm over time. Methods Using a North American prospective registry (2005–2015; mostly urban settings), we selected adult (18 years and over) patients who experienced a witnessed OHCA from a suspected cardiac etiology. Patients with an emergency medical services witnessed OHCA were only included in sensitivity analyses. The association between the NFT, BLFT and the presence of a shockable rhythm was evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression adjusting for the registry version, age, sex, and public location. Results A total of 229,632 patients were logged in the registry, 50,957 of whom were included. Of these, 17,704 (34.7%) had an initial shockable rhythm. After the first minute, a significant decrease over time in the occurrence of shockable rhythm is observed but is slower when bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is provided (each supplemental minute of BLFT: adjusted odds ratio = 0.95, 95 %CI = 0.94–0.95; each supplemental minute of NFT: adjusted odds ratio = 0.91, 95 %CI = 0.90–0.91]). Conclusions In this large observational study, we were able to demonstrate that longer NFT were associated with lower odds of shockable presenting rhythms. Bystander CPR significantly mitigates the degradation of shockable rhythms over time, strengthening the need to improve bystander CPR rates around the world.

BACKGROUND: Emergency physicians lack high-quality evidence for many diagnostic and treatment decisions made for patients with suspected or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Our objective is to describe the methods used to collect and ensure the data quality of a multicentre registry of patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. METHODS: This methodology study describes a population-based registry that has been enrolling consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 since Mar. 1, 2020. Most data are collected from retrospective chart review. Phone follow-up with patients at 30 days captures the World Health Organization clinical improvement scale and contextual, social and cultural variables. Phone follow-up also captures patient-reported quality of life using the Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey at 30 days, 60 days, 6 months and 12 months. Fifty participating emergency departments from 8 provinces in Canada currently enrol patients into the registry. INTERPRETATION: Data from the registry of the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network will be used to derive and validate clinical decision rules to inform clinical decision-making, describe the natural history of the disease, evaluate COVID-19 diagnostic tests and establish the real-world effectiveness of treatments and vaccines, including in populations that are excluded or underrepresented in clinical trials. This registry has the potential to generate scientific evidence to inform our pandemic response, and to serve as a model for the rapid implementation of population-based data collection protocols for future public health emergencies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, no. NCT04702945.

Aims Initial shockable rhythms may be a marker of shorter duration between collapse and initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, known as no-flow time (NFT), for patients suffering an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Eligibility for extracorporeal resuscitation is conditional on a short NFT. Patients with an unwitnessed OHCA could be candidate for extracorporeal resuscitation despite uncertain NFT if an initial shockable rhythm is a reliable stand-in. Herein, we sought to describe the sensitivity and specificity of an initial shockable rhythm for predicting a NFT of five minutes or less. Methods Using a registry of OHCA in Montreal, Canada, adult patients who experienced a witnessed non-traumatic OHCA, but who did not receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, were included. The sensitivity and specificity of an initial shockable rhythm for predicting a NFT of five minute or less were calculated. The association between the NFT and the presence of a shockable rhythm was evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression. Results A total of 2450 patients were included, of whom 863 (35%) had an initial shockable rhythm and 1085 (44%) a NFT of five minutes or less. The sensitivity of an initial shockable rhythm to predict a NFT of five minutes or less was 36% (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 33–39), specificity was 66% (95%CI 63–68), the positive likelihood ratio was 1.05 (95%CI 0.94–1.17) and the negative likelihood ratio of 0.97 (95%CI 0.92–1.03). The probabilities of observing a shockable rhythm stayed stable up to 15 minutes, while the probabilities of observing a PEA lowered rapidly initially. Longer NFT were associated with lower odds of observing an initial shockable rhythm (adjusted odds ratio = 0.97 [95%CI 0.94–0.99], p = 0.012). Conclusions An initial shockable rhythm is a poor predictor of a short NFT, despite there being an association between the NFT and the presence of a shockable rhythm.

It is true that the sample size for our cohort was previously calculated by Emond et al.1 to determine the incidence of delirium. However, the logistic regression analysis used in our study included the total 338 patients and not only the 41 patients with delirium. In addition, we reported a power calculation showing that with 338 patients, we had 80% chance of finding an odd-ratio (OR) of at least 1.7 for a predictor of delirium, considering a baseline probability of 0.12 of delirium (41 cases). According to Chen et al.2 an OR of 1.7 is considered a small effect size by Cohen references, so we had sufficient power in our study to detect even a small effect size. It is also true that we did not have the power to examine the relationship between diagnoses and delirium in our study. However, in an ED setting, this relationship has not been clearly established.

The objective of this study was to identify the predictors of incident delirium in this high-risk population.This study was a planned sub-analysis of the INDEED multicentre cohort study. We recruited patients aged ≥ 65, independent/semi-independent, with an emergency department (ED) length of stay ≥ 8 h and admitted to any hospital ward. Patients were followed up during their ED stay up to 24 h after ward admission. Sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, functional status (OARS), illness severity, level of frailty, cognitive status (TICS-m) and ED/patient environment evaluation were collected during initial interview. Patients were screened for delirium twice a day using the Confusion Assessment Method. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify the predictors of delirium.Incident delirium was detected in 68 patients of the 612 patients included (11%). Initially, seven candidate predictors were included in a regression model, of which four were retained using a stepwise selection procedure. Presence of cognitive impairment at baseline (OR 3.6, p 0.001), absence of mobilization during the whole ED length of stay (OR 3.3, p = 0.002), longer ED length of stay (OR 1.02, p = 0.006) were associated with a higher risk of incident delirium while higher functional status was associated with a lower risk (OR 0.8, p 0.001).More work is needed to determine which tool(s) are most appropriate for the ED use to increase delirium screening compliance among health professionals working in this department. It is really the first step to be able to suggest interventions to decrease delirium incidence.RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'objectif de cette étude était d'identifier les prédicteurs du délirium incident dans cette population à hautrisque. MéTHODES: Cette étude était une sous-analyse planifiée de l'étude de cohorte multicentrique INDEED. Nous avons recruté des patients âgés de ≥ 65 ans, indépendants/semi-indépendants, ayant une durée de séjour au département d'urgence (DU) ≥ 8 h et admis dans n'importe quel service. Les patients ont été suivis pendant leur séjour aux urgences jusqu'à 24 h après leur admission. Les caractéristiques sociodémographiques, les comorbidités, l'état fonctionnel (OARS), la gravité de la maladie, le niveau de fragilité, l'état cognitif (TICS-m) et l'évaluation de l'environnement des urgences/patients ont été recueillis lors de l'entretien initial. Les patients ont été soumis à un dépistage du délirium deux fois par jour à l'aide de la méthode d'évaluation de la confusion. Une régression logistique multivariée a été effectuée pour identifier les prédicteurs de délirium. RéSULTATS: Le délirium incident a été détecté chez 68 des 612 patients inclus (11%). Au départ, sept prédicteurs candidats ont été inclus dans un modèle de régression, dont quatre ont été retenus par une procédure de sélection par étapes. La présence d'un déficit cognitif initial (RC 3,6, p0,001), l'absence de mobilisation pendant toute la durée du séjour à l'urgence (RC 3,3, p = 0,002), une durée de séjour plus longue à l'urgence (RC 1,02, p = 0,006) étaient associées à un risque plus élevé de délirium incident, tandis qu'un état fonctionnel plus élevé était associé à un risque plus faible (RC 0,8, p0,001). CONCLUSIONS: Des travaux supplémentaires sont nécessaires pour déterminer quel(s) outil(s) sont les plus appropriés au DU afin d'accroître le dépistage du délirium par les professionnels de santé travaillant dans ce service. C'est vraiment la première étape pour pouvoir proposer des interventions visant à diminuer l'incidence du délirium.

Evaluate the incidence and risk factors of opioid use 1 year after injury in elderly trauma patients.The current epidemic of prescription opioid misuse and overdose observed in North America generally concerns young patients. Little is known on long-term opioid use among the elderly trauma population.In a retrospective observational multicenter cohort study conducted on registry data, all patients 65 years and older admitted (hospital stay2 days) for injury in 57 adult trauma centers in the province of Quebec (Canada) between 2004 and 2014 were included. We searched for filled opioid prescriptions in the year preceding the injury, up to 3 months and 1 year after the injury.In all, 39,833 patients were selected for analysis. Mean age was 79.3 years (±7.7), 69% were women, and 87% of the sample was opioid-naive. After the injury, 38% of the patients filled an opioid prescription within 3 months and 10.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.6%-11.2%] filled an opioid prescription 1 year after trauma: 6.8% (95% CI 6.5%-7.1%) were opioid-naïve and 37.6% (95% CI 36.3%-38.9%) were opioid non-naive patients. Controlling for confounders, patients who filled 2 or more opioid prescriptions before the injury and those who filled an opioid prescription within 3 months after the injury were, respectively, 11.4 and 3 times more likely to use opioids 1 year after the injury compared with those who did not fill opioid prescriptions.These results highlight that elderly trauma patients are at risk of long-term opioid use, especially if they had preinjury or early postinjury opioid consumption.

ObjectivePatient sleep quality has a significant impact on recovery. However, most hospital units do not provide an optimal environment for sleep and there are currently no data available on how well patients sleep during their emergency department stay. The main objective of this study was to assess the subjective quality of nighttime sleep and factors that affect sleep in the emergency department (ED).MethodsA prospective sample of patients aged 18 years and older who presented to the ED from July 2015 to October 2015 was investigated. All participants were on stretcher and slept at least one night in the ED. Participants were asked to complete a sleep questionnaire adapted to the ED environment on sleep quality and its potentially modifying factors.ResultsA total of 235 patients participated in the study (mean age: 64±20 years, 51% women). Compared to the week at home prior to admission, subjective sleep quality was lower in the ED (pConclusionsSubjective sleep quality in the emergency department is not optimal, and is influenced by stress, noise, pain, and stretcher comfort, all potentially modifiable factors.

OBJECTIVES Delirium is very frequent in older patients presenting to the emergency department (ED), but is often undetected. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the French version of the 4 A’s Test (4AT-F) for the detection of delirium and cognitive impairment in older patients. METHODS The study was conducted in four Canadian ED. Participants (n= 320) were independent or semi-independent patients (able to perform ≥5 activities of daily living) aged 65 and older and had an 8-hour exposure to the ED environment. The Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-m), the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) as well as the 4AT-F were administered to patients at the initial interview. The CAM and 4AT-F were then administered twice a day during the patients’ ED or hospital stay. The 4AT-F’s sensitivity and specificity were compared to those of the CAM (for delirium), and to that of the TICS (for cognitive impairment). RESULTS Our results suggest that the 4AT-F has a sensitivity of 84% (95% CI: [76, 93]) and a specificity of 74% (95% CI: [70, 78]) for delirium, as well as a sensitivity of 49% (95% CI: [34, 64]) and a specificity of 87% (95% CI: [82, 92]) for cognitive impairment. CONCLUSION The 4AT-F is a fast and reliable screening tool for delirium and cognitive impairment in ED. Due to its quick administration time, it allows a systematic screening of patients at risk of delirium, without significantly increasing the workload of the ED staff.

Patients suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are frequently transported to the closest hospital. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is often indicated following OHCA. This study's primary objective was to determine the association between being transported to a PCI-capable hospital and survival to discharge for patients with OHCA. The additional delay to hospital arrival which could offset a potential increase in survival associated with being transported to a PCI-capable center was also evaluated.This study used a registry of OHCA in Montreal, Canada. Adult patients transported to a hospital following a non-traumatic OHCA were included. Hospitals were dichotomized based on whether PCI was available on-site or not. The effect of hospital type on survival to discharge was assessed using a multivariable logistic regression. The added prehospital delay which could offset the increase in survival associated with being transported to a PCI-capable center was calculated using that regression.A total of 4922 patients were included, of whom 2389 (48%) were transported to a PCI-capable hospital and 2533 (52%) to a non-PCI-capable hospital. There was an association between being transported to a PCI-capable center and survival to discharge (adjusted odds ratio = 1.60 [95% confidence interval 1.25-2.05], p .001). Increasing the delay from call to hospital arrival by 14.0 min would offset the potential benefit of being transported to a PCI-capable center.It could be advantageous to redirect patients suffering from OHCA patients to PCI-capable centers if the resulting expected delay is of less than 14 min.

ObjectivesTo develop and validate a clinical risk score that can accurately quantify the probability of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients presenting to an emergency department without the need for laboratory testing.DesignCohort study of participants in the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN) registry. Regression models were fitted to predict a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result using clinical and demographic predictors, as well as an indicator of local SARS-CoV-2 incidence.Setting32 emergency departments in eight Canadian provinces.Participants27 665 consecutively enrolled patients who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 in participating emergency departments between 1 March and 30 October 2020.Main outcome measuresPositive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test result within 14 days of an index emergency department encounter for suspected COVID-19 disease.ResultsWe derived a 10-item CCEDRRN COVID-19 Infection Score using data from 21 743 patients. This score included variables from history and physical examination and an indicator of local disease incidence. The score had a c-statistic of 0.838 with excellent calibration. We externally validated the rule in 5295 patients. The score maintained excellent discrimination and calibration and had superior performance compared with another previously published risk score. Score cut-offs were identified that can rule-in or rule-out SARS-CoV-2 infection without the need for nucleic acid testing with 97.4% sensitivity (95% CI 96.4 to 98.3) and 95.9% specificity (95% CI 95.5 to 96.0).ConclusionsThe CCEDRRN COVID-19 Infection Score uses clinical characteristics and publicly available indicators of disease incidence to quantify a patient’s probability of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The score can identify patients at sufficiently high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection to warrant isolation and empirical therapy prior to test confirmation while also identifying patients at sufficiently low risk of infection that they may not need testing.Trial registration numberNCT04702945.

A change in prehospital redirection practice could potentially increase the proportion of E-CPR eligible patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) transported to extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) capable centers. The objective of this study was to quantify this potential increase of E-CPR candidates transported to E-CPR capable centers.Adults with non-traumatic OHCA refractory to 15min of resuscitation were selected from a registry of adult OHCA collected between 2010 and 2015 in Montreal, Canada. Using this cohort, three simulation scenarios allowing prehospital redirection to E-CPR centers were created. Stringent eligibility criteria for E-CPR and redirection for E-CPR (e.g. age60years old, initial shockable rhythm) were used in the first scenario, intermediate eligibility criteria (e.g. age65years old, at least one shock given) in the second scenario and inclusive eligibility criteria (e.g. age70years old, initial rhythm ≠ asystole) in the third scenario. All three scenarios were contrasted with equivalent scenarios in which patients were transported to the closest hospital. Proportions were compared using McNemar's test.The proportion of E-CPR eligible patients transported to E-CPR capable centers increased in each scenario (stringent criteria: 48 [24.5%] vs 155 patients [79.1%], p0.001; intermediate criteria: 81 [29.6%] vs 262 patients [95.6%], p0.001; inclusive criteria: 238 [23.9%] vs 981 patients [98.5%], p0.001).A prehospital redirection system could significantly increase the number of patients with refractory OHCA transported to E-CPR capable centers, thus increasing their access to this potentially life-saving procedure, provided allocated resources are planned accordingly.

Objectives Out-of-hospital advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) has not consistently shown a positive impact on survival. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) could render prolonged on-site resuscitation (ACLS or basic cardiac life support [BCLS]) undesirable in selected cases. The objectives of this study were to evaluate, in patients suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and in a subgroup of potential E-CPR candidates, the association between the addition of prehospital ACLS to BCLS and survival to hospital discharge, prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and delay from call to hospital arrival. Methods This cohort study targets adult patients treated for OHCA between April 2010 and December 2015 in the city of Montreal, Canada. We defined potential E-CPR candidates using clinical criteria previously described in the literature (65 years of age or younger, initial shockable rhythm, absence of ROSC after 15 minutes of prehospital resuscitation, and emergency medical services–witnessed collapse or witnessed collapse with bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation). Associations were evaluated using multivariate regression models. Results A total of 7,134 patients with OHCA were included, 761 (10.7%) of whom survived to discharge. No independent association between survival to hospital discharge and the addition of prehospital ACLS to BCLS was found in either the entire cohort (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.05 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 0.84–1.32], p = 0.68) or among the 246 potential E-CPR candidates (AOR = 0.82 [95% CI = 0.36–1.84], p = 0.63). The addition of prehospital ACLS to BCLS was associated with a significant increase in the rate of prehospital ROSC in all patients experiencing OHCA (AOR = 3.92 [95% CI = 3.38–4.55], p < 0.001) and in potential E-CPR candidates (AOR = 3.48 [95% CI = 1. 76–6.88], p < 0.001) compared to isolated prehospital BCLS. Delay from call to hospital arrival was longer in the ACLS group than in the BCLS group (difference = 16 minutes [95% CI = 15–16 minutes], p < 0.001). Conclusions In a tiered-response urban emergency medical service setting, prehospital ACLS is not associated with an improvement in survival to hospital discharge in patients suffering from OHCA and in potential E-CPR candidates, but with an improvement in prehospital ROSC and with longer delay to hospital arrival.

Introduction: Malgré les progrès au niveau des soins de réanimation lors des dernières années, le pronostic des patients souffrant d'un arrêt cardiorespiratoire (ACR) demeure abyssal et aucun médicament ne semble influencer leur devenir au long cours. Cependant, les résultats de quelques études évaluant l'impact des bêtabloqueurs chez cette population s'avèrent cependant très encourageants. L'objectif de cette revue systématique, est d’évaluer l’évidence disponible quant à l'impact des bêtabloqueurs sur le devenir des patients traités pour un ACR dont le rythme initial est défibrillable. Methods: La présente revue systématique a été préalablement enregistrée sur Prospero (CRD42018105453). Les moteurs de recherche Medline, Embase et CENTRAL ont été fouillés de leur création jusqu'au 17 octobre 2018. La recherche de littérature grise s'est faite via Web of Science et Google Scholar. Les références de tous les articles inclus ainsi que des méta-analyses existantes sur le sujet ont également été révisées. Tous les types de devis ont été considérés, sauf les études de cas et les séries de cas. Les études devaient inclure des adultes (16 ans et plus) en ACR dont le rythme initial était défibrillable, dont une partie avait reçu un médicament bêtabloquants par voie intraveineuse pendant leur ACR et l'autre un traitement standard, et présenter une mesure de résultat centrée sur le patient (retour de circulation spontanée [RCS], survie ou bon devenir neurologique). La qualité des articles a été évaluée à l'aide du ‘Newcastle Ottawa scale’. Results: Deux études observationnelles rétrospectives, menées auprès d'un total de 66 patients, ont été incluses. Il y avait une association positive entre l'administration de bêtabloquants et l'occurrence d'un RCS (rapport de cotes [RC] = 5.76 [intervalle de confiance {IC} à 95% = 1.79-18.52], p = 0.003), ainsi qu'avec la présence d'un bon devenir neurologique (RC = 4.42 [IC95% = 1.05 - 18.56], p = 0.04). Une telle association n'a cependant pas été observée par rapport à la survie au congé hospitalier. Conclusion: L'administration de bêtabloquants semble associé à un meilleur devenir chez les patients en ACR avec un rythme initial défibrillable. Étant donné la nature du devis de ces études et leur petite taille, une étude prospective de qualité serait nécessaire afin de déterminer l'efficacité de cette classe de médicament et de faire une recommandation forte à ce sujet.

Introduction: Patients hospitalized following a trauma will be frequently treated with opioids during their stay and after discharge. We examined the relationship between acute phase (< 3 months) opioid use after discharge and the risk of opioid poisoning (OP) or opioid use disorder (OUD) in older trauma patients Methods: In a retrospective multicenter cohort study conducted on registry data, we included all patients aged 65 years and older admitted (hospital stay >2 days) for injury in 57 trauma centers in the province of Quebec (Canada) between 2004 and 2014. We searched for OP and OUD from ICD-9 and ICD-10 code diagnosis that resulted in a hospitalization or a medical consultation after their initial injury. Patients that filled an opioid prescription within a 3-month period after sustaining the trauma were compared to those who did not fill an opioid prescription during that period using Cox proportional hazards regressions. Results: A total of 70,314 participants were retained for analysis; median age was 82 years (IQR: 75-87), 68% were women, and 34% of the patients filled an opioid prescription within 3-months of the initial trauma. During a median follow-up of 2.6 years (IQR: 1-5), 192 participants (0.30%; 95%CI: 0.25%-0.35%) were hospitalized for OP and 73 (0.10%; 95%CI: 0.07%-0.13%) were diagnosed with OUD. Having filled an opioid prescription within 3-months of injury was associated with an increased hazard ratio of OP (2.6; 95%CI: 1.9-3.5) and OUD (4.0; 95%CI: 2.3-7.0). However, history of OP (2.7; 95%CI: 1.2-6.1), of substance use disorder (4.3; 95%CI: 2.4-7.9), or of opioid prescription filled (2.7; 95%CI: 2.1-3.5) before trauma were also related to OP or OUD. Conclusion: Opioid poisoning and opioid use disorder are rare events after hospitalization for trauma in older patients. However, opioids should be used cautiously in patients with history of substance use disorder, opioid poisoning or opioid use during the past year.

Background delirium is associated with increased morbidity and mortality among older emergency department (ED) patients. When using physician gestalt, delirium is missed in the majority of patients. The Ottawa 3DY (O3DY) has been validated to detect cognitive dysfunction among older ED patients. Objectives to determine the sensitivity and specificity of serial O3DY assessments to detect delirium in older ED patients. Design a prospective observational multicenter cohort study. Setting four Quebec EDs. Participants independent or semi-independent older patients (age ≥ 65 years) with an ED stay of at least 8 hours that required hospitalisation. Measurements eligible patients were evaluated using serial O3DY assessments at least 6 hours apart. The primary outcome was delirium after at least 8 hours in the ED. The reference standard for delirium assessment was the confusion assessment method (CAM). The sensitivity and specificity of the serial O3DY to detect delirium were calculated. Results we enrolled 301 patients (mean age 77 years, 49.5% male, 3.0% with a history of mild dementia). Thirty patients (10.0%) were CAM positive for delirium. Patients had a median of three O3DY assessments. Serial O3DY evaluations to detect delirium among patients with at least one abnormal O3DY had a sensitivity of 86.7% (95% confidence interval—CI 69.3–96.2%) and a specificity of 44.3% (95%; CI 38.3–50.4%). Conclusion serial O3DY testing demonstrates good sensitivity as a screening tool to detect delirium among older adult patients with prolonged ED lengths of stay. Emergency physicians should consider the use of the serial O3DY over clinician gestalt to improve delirium detection.

ObjectiveThe management of acute pain constitutes an essential skill of emergency department (ED) physicians. However, the accurate assessment of pain intensity and relief represents a clinically challenging undertaking. Some studies have proposed to define effective pain relief as the patient’s refusal for additional analgesic administration. The aim of this study was to verify whether such a refusal is effectively indicative of pain relief.MethodsThis prospective cohort study included ED patients who received single or multiple doses of pain medication for an acute pain problem. Patients were evaluated for pain relief using one Likert scale and two dichotomous questions: Is your pain relieved? and Do you want more analgesics? Non-relieved patients were further analysed using a checklist as to the reasons behind their refusal for supplemental pain medication.ResultsWe have recruited 378 adult patients with a mean age of 50.3 years (±19.1); 60% were women and had an initial mean pain level of 7.3 (±2.0) out of 10. We observed that 68 out of 244 patients who were adequately relieved from pain asked for more analgesics (28%), whereas 51 out of 134 patients who were not relieved from pain refused supplemental drugs (38%). Reasons for refusal included wanting to avoid side effects, feeling sufficiently relieved, and disliking the medication’s effects.ConclusionOver a third of ED patients in acute pain were not relieved but refused supplemental pain medication. Patients have reported legitimate reasons to decline further analgesics, and this refusal cannot be used as an indication of pain relief.

ObjectivesInadequate acute pain management can reduce the quality of life, cause unnecessary suffering and can often lead to the development of chronic pain. Using group-based trajectory modelling, we previously identified six distinct pain intensity trajectories for the first 14-day postemergency department (ED) discharge; two linear ones with moderate or severe pain during follow-up (~40% of the patients) and four cubic polynomial order trajectories with mild or no pain at the end of the 14 days (low final pain trajectories). We assessed if previously described acute pain intensity trajectories over 14 days after ED discharge are predictive of chronic pain 3 months later.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingTertiary care trauma centre academic hospital.ParticipantsThis study included 18 years and older ED patients who consulted for acute (≤2 weeks) pain conditions that were discharged with an opioid prescription. Patients completed a 14-day diary in which they listed their daily pain intensity (0–10 numeric rating scale).OutcomesThree months after ED visit, participants were questioned by phone about their current pain intensity (0–10 numeric rating scale). Chronic pain was defined as patients with current pain intensity ≥4 at 3 months.ResultsA total of 305 participants remained in the study at 3 months, 49% were women and a mean age of 55±15 years. Twelve per cent (11.9; 95% CI 8.2 to 15.4) of patients had chronic pain at the 3-month follow-up. Controlling for age, sex and pain condition, patients with moderate or severe pain trajectories and those with only a severe pain trajectory were respectively 5.1 (95% CI 2.2 to 11.8) and 8.2 (95% CI 3.4 to 20.0) times more likely to develop chronic pain 3 months later compared with patients in the low final pain trajectories.ConclusionSpecific acute pain trajectories following an ED visit are closely related to the development of chronic pain 3 months later.Trial registration numberNCT02799004; Results.

Introduction: The elderly (65 yo and more) increase in Canada is well documented along with a disproportionate use of Emergency Departments after a minor injury. These patients requires specific care given a 16% risk of functional decline following a visit to ED. To prevent functional decline, a multidimensional assessment of the elderly is recommended in the emergency department. Objective: To determine if ED grip strength can predict functional decline at 3 or 6 months post-injury. Methods: A multicentre prospective study in 5 ED across Canada was realized between 2013 and 16. Patients 65 years old and over, autonomous in daily living activities and consulting the emergency department for minor trauma were recruited 7 days a week. Clinical-demographic data, functional status, fear of falling, number of falls in the last month, grip strength measurement were collected in the ED. Functional decline (loss of at least points to functional status) was calculated at 3 and 6 months. Descriptive statistics and linear regression model with repeated measurements were used to determine if the grip strength was predictive of functional decline at 3 or 6 months. Results: 387 patient were recruited. Mean age was 74 ± 7 years old, 52% were male. XXX experienced a fall in the last month. The initial maximum grip strength was (24 ± 10 intervention vs. 28 ± 13 control; p ≤ 0.05). grip strength is associated with pre-injury functional status (p Conclusion: Given the strong association with fear of falling and functional status at initial ED evaluation, we recommend that grip strength measurement could be included in a multidisciplinary geriatric emergency department assessment as needed.

For patients suffering from an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), having an initial shockable rhythm is a marker of good prognosis. It has been suggested as one of the main prognosticating factors for the selection of patients for extracorporeal resuscitation (E-CPR). However, the prognostic implication of converting from a non-shockable to a shockable rhythm, as compared to having an initial shockable rhythm, remains uncertain, especially among patients that can otherwise be considered eligible for E-CPR. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between the initial rhythm and its subsequent conversion and survival following an OHCA, for the general population and for E-CPR candidates.This study used a registry of OHCA in Montreal, Canada. Adult patients suffering from a non-traumatic OHCA for whom the initial rhythm was known were included. The association between the initial rhythm and its subsequent conversion or not and survival to discharge was assessed using a multivariable logistic regression.Of 6681 included patients, 1788 (27%) had an initial shockable rhythm, 1749 (26%) had pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and no subsequent shockable rhythm, 295 (4%) had PEA and a subsequent shockable rhythm, 2694 (40%) had asystole and no subsequent shockable rhythm, and 155 (2%) asystole and a subsequent shockable rhythm. As compared to patients having an initial shockable rhythm, patients in all other groups had significantly lower odds of survival to hospital discharge (p 0.001 for all comparisons). Univariate analyses were performed for E-CPR candidates. Among these 556 (8%) patients, more patients with an initial shockable rhythm survived than patients in all other groups (p 0.001 for all comparisons).The initial rhythm remains a much better prognostic marker than subsequent rhythms for all patients suffering from an OHCA, including in the subset of potential E-CPR candidates.

ObjectivesPatients suffering from an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) associated with an initial shockable rhythm have a better prognosis than their counterparts. The implications of recurrent or refractory malignant arrhythmia in such context remain unclear. The objective of this study is to evaluate the association between the number of prehospital shocks delivered and survival to hospital discharge among patients in OHCA.MethodsThis cohort study included adult patients with an initial shockable rhythm over a 5-year period from a registry of OHCA in Montreal, Canada. The relationship between the number of prehospital shocks delivered and survival to discharge was described using dynamic probabilities. The association between the number of prehospital shocks delivered and survival to discharge was assessed using multivariable logistic regression.ResultsA total of 1,788 patients (78% male with a mean age of 64 years) were included in this analysis, of whom 536 (30%) received treatments from an advanced care paramedic. A third of the cohort (583 patients, 33%) survived to hospital discharge. The probability of survival was highest with the first shock (33% [95% confidence interval 30%-35%]), but decreased to 8% (95% confidence interval 4%-13%) following nine shocks. A higher number of prehospital shocks was independently associated with lower odds of survival (adjusted odds ratio=0.88 [95% confidence interval 0.85-0.92], p < 0.001).ConclusionSurvival remains possible even after a high number of shocks for patients suffering from an OHCA with an initial shockable rhythm. However, requiring more shocks is independently associated with worse survival.

Background Studies evaluating long-term prescription opioid use are retrospective and based on filled opioid prescriptions from governmental databases. These studies cannot evaluate if opioids were really consumed and are unable to differentiate if they were used for a new pain or chronic pain or were misused. The aim of this study was to assess opioid use rate and reasons for consuming 3 months after being discharged from the emergency department (ED) with an opioid prescription. Methods This is a prospective cohort study conducted in the ED of a tertiary care urban center with a convenience sample of discharged patients ≥ 18 years who consulted for an acute pain condition (≤2 weeks). Three months post-ED visit, participants were interviewed by phone on their past 2-week opioid consumption and their reasons for consuming: a) for pain related to the initial ED visit, b) for a new unrelated pain, or c) for another reason. Results Of the 524 participants questioned at 3 months (mean ± SD age = 51 ± 16 years, 47% women), 47 patients (9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 7%-12%) reported consuming opioids in the previous 2 weeks. Among those, 34 (72%) reported using opioids for their initial pain, nine (19%) for a new unrelated pain and four (9%) for another reason (0.8%, 95% CI = 0.3%-2.0%, of the whole cohort). Patients who used opioids during the 2 weeks after the ED visit were 3.8 (95% CI = 1.2-12.7) times more likely to consume opioids at 3 months. Conclusion Opioid use at the 3-month follow-up in ED patients discharged with an opioid prescription for an acute pain condition is not necessarily associated with opioid misuse; 91% of those patients consumed opioids to treat pain. Of the whole cohort, less than 1% reported using opioids for reasons other than pain. The rate of long-term opioid use reported by prescription-filling database studies should not be viewed as a proxy for incidence of opioid misuse.

Introduction: Les patients ayant un retour de circulation spontanée (RCS) durant la phase préhospitalière de leur réanimation suite à un arrêt cardiaque extrahospitalier (ACEH) ont un meilleur taux de survie que ceux n'en ayant pas. La durée des efforts de réanimation avant l'initiation d'un transport ne varie généralement pas en fonction du rythme initial observé. Cette étude vise à comparer la durée des manœuvres de réanimation nécessaire afin de générer la majorité des RCS préhospitaliers et des RCS préhospitaliers menant à une survie en fonction du rythme initial. Methods: La présente étude de cohorte a été réalisée à partir des bases de données collectées de la Corporation d'Urgences-santé dans la région de Montréal entre 2010 et 2015. Les patients avec un ACEH d'origine médicale ont été inclus. Les patients dont l'ACEH était témoigné par les paramédics ont été exclus, tout comme ceux dont le rythme initial était inconnu. Nous avons comparé entre les groupes (rythme défibrillable [RD], activité électrique sans pouls [AESP] et asystolie) les taux de RCS préhospitalier et le temps nécessaires pour obtenir une majorité des RCS préhospitaliers et des RCS préhospitaliers menant à une survie. Results: Un total de 6002 patients (3851 hommes et 2151 femmes) d'un âge moyen de 52 ans ( ±10) ont été inclus dans l’étude, parmi lesquels 563 (9%) ont survécu jusqu’à leur congé hospitalier et 1310 (22%) ont obtenu un RCS préhospitalier. Un total de 1545 (26%) patients avaient un RD, 1654 (28%) une AESP et 2803 (47%) une asystolie. Les patients avec un RD ont obtenu plus fréquemment un RCS préhospitalier et un RCS préhospitalier menant à une survie que les patients avec une AESP qui eux même avaient un meilleur pronostic que ceux avec une asystolie initial (777 patients [55%] vs 385 [23%] vs 148 [5%], p < 0,001; 431 [28%] vs 85 [5%] vs 7 [0,2%], p < 0,001, respectivement). Les RCS survenaient également plus rapidement lorsque le rythme initial était un RD (13 minutes [ ±12] vs 18 [ ±13] vs 25 [ ±12], p < 0,001). Cependant, une période de réanimation plus longue était nécessaire afin d'obtenir 95% des RCS préhospitaliers menant à une survie pour les patients avec un RD (26 minutes vs 21 minutes vs 21 minutes). Conclusion: Les patients avec un rythme initial défibrillable suite à leur ACEH sont à meilleur pronostic. Il serait envisageable de transporter plus rapidement vers l'hôpital les patients avec une AESP ou une asystolie que ceux avec un rythme défibrillable si l'arrêt des manœuvres n'est pas envisagé.

Introduction: Les patients dont l'arrêt cardiaque extrahospitalier (ACEH) n'a pas été témoigné sont généralement exclus des protocoles de réanimation par circulation extracorporelle puisque le délai avant l'initiation de leur réanimation est inconnu. Il a été proposé que la présence d'un rythme initial défibrillable (RD) est fortement suggestif une très courte période avant l'initiation des manœuvres de réanimation. La présente étude vise à décrire l'association entre la durée avant l'initiation de la réanimation et la présence d'un RD chez des patients souffrant d'un ACEH. Methods: Cette étude de cohorte a été réalisée à partir des bases de données collectées de la Corporation d'Urgences-santé dans la région de Montréal entre 2010 et 2015. Les patients dont l'arrêt était témoigné, mais dont les témoins n'ont pas entamé de manœuvres de réanimation, ont été inclus. Nous avons également inclus les patients dont l'arrêt était témoigné par les paramédics comme groupe contrôle (durée avant l'initiation de la réanimation = 0 minute). Les patients avec un retour de circulation spontanée avant l'arrivée des services préhospitaliers ont été exclus, tout comme ceux dont le rythme initial était inconnu. Nous avons décrit l’évolution de la proportion de chacun des rythmes et construit une régression logistique multivariée ajustant pour les variables sociodémographiques et cliniques pertinentes. Results: Un total de 1751 patients (1173 hommes et 578 femmes) d'un âge moyen de 69 ans (±16) ont été inclus dans l'analyse principale, parmi lesquels 603 (34%) avaient un RD. Un total de 663 autres patients ont vu leur ACEH témoigné directement par les paramédics. Un plus court délai avant l'initiation des manœuvres est associé à la présence d'un RD (rapport de cotes ajusté = 0,97 [intervalle de confiance à 95% 0,94-0,99], p = 0,016). Cependant, cette relation n'est pas linéaire et la proportion de RD ne diminue pas avant notablement jusqu’à ce que 15 minutes s’écoulent avant le début de la réanimation (0 min = 35%, 1-5 min = 37%, 5-10 min = 35%, 10-15 min = 34%, +de 15 min = 16%). Conclusion: Bien que la proportion de patients avec un RD diminue lorsque le délai augmente avant l'initiation des manœuvres, cette relation ne semble pas linéaire. La baisse principale de la proportion de patients avec RD semble se produire suite à la quinzième minute de délai avant le début de la réanimation.

Introduction: According to WHO, one third of patients aged ≥65 fall every year. Those falls account for 25% of all geriatric emergency department (ED) visits. Fear of falling (FOF) is common in older patients who sustained a fall and is associated with a decline in mobility and health issues for patients. We hypothesized that there is an association between FOF and return to ED (RTED) and future falls. Objective: To assess the relation between FOF and RTED and subsequent falls in older ED patients Methods: This research was conducted as part of the Canadian Emergency Team Initiative in elderly (CETIe) multicenter prospective cohort study from 2011 to 2016. Participants: Patients 65 years or older were assessed and discharged from ED following a minor trauma. They had to be independent in all basic activities of daily living and being able to communicate in English or French. Measures: Primary outcome was RTED and secondary outcome was subsequent falls. Both were self-reported at 3 and 6 months. Patients were stratified according to Short Falls Efficacy Scale International (SFES-I) score, assessing FOF in different situations. A total score is calculated to determine the mild, moderate or severe level of FOF. Previous falls and TUG were used to evaluate patients’ mobility. OARS, ISAR and SOF were used to evaluated patient frailty. Descriptive statistical were performed and multiple regression were performed to show the association between SFES-1 score and outcomes. Results: FOF was measured in 2899 participants, of which 2214 participated at the 3 months follow-up and 2009 participated at the 6 months follow-up. Odds Ratio (OR) of return to ED at 3 months was 1.10 for moderate FOF and 1.52 for severe FOF (Type 3 test p = 0.11). At 6 months, OR was 1.03 for moderate FOF and 1.25 for severe FOF (Type 3 test p = 0.63). OR of subsequent fall at 3 months was 1.80 for moderate FOF and 2.18 for severe FOF (Type 3 test p < 0.001). At 6 months, OR of subsequent fall was 1.63 for moderate FOF and 2.37 for severe FOF (Type 3 test p < 0.001). Conclusion: The multicenter cohort study showed that severe fear of falling is strongly associated with subsequent falls over the next 6 months following ED discharge, but not significantly associated with return to ED episodes. Further research should be done to analyze the association between severe FOF and RTED.

ObjectivesThis study aimed to ascertain the association between self-reported pain intensity and vital signs in both emergency department (ED) patients and a subgroup of patients with diagnosed conditions known to produce significant pain.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of real-time, archived data from an electronic medical record system at an urban teaching hospital and regional community hospital. We included consecutive ED patients ≥16 years old who had a self-reported pain intensity ≥1 as measured during triage, from March 2005 to December 2012. The primary outcome was vital signs for self-reported pain intensity levels (mild, moderate, severe) on an 11-point verbal numerical scale. Changes in pain intensity levels were also compared to variations in vital signs. Both analyses were repeated on a subgroup of patients with diagnosed conditions recognized to produce significant pain: fracture, dislocation, or renal colic.ResultsWe included 153,567 patients (mean age of 48.4±19.3 years; 55.5% women) triaged with pain (median intensity of 7/10±3). Of these, 8.9% of patients had diagnosed conditions recognized to produce significant pain. From the total sample, the difference between mild and severe pain categories was 2.7 beats/minutes (95% CI: 2.4−3.0) for heart rate and 0.13 mm Hg (95% CI: -0.26−0.52) for systolic blood pressure. These differences generated small effect sizes and were not clinically significant. Results were similar for patients who experienced changes in pain categories and for those conditions recognized to produce significant pain.ConclusionHealth care professionals cannot use vital signs to estimate or substantiate self-reported pain intensity levels or changes over time.

Opioids are an important avenue for the treatment of pain among individuals presenting to the emergency department. Unfortunately, opioid administration can lead to several complications including nausea/vomiting, oxygen desaturation and hypotension. The authors aimed to determine the incidence of such adverse events among 31,742 patients who were treated with opioids in the emergency department of a single large tertiary care hospital in Montreal, Quebec., BACKGROUND: The efficacy of opioids for acute pain relief in the emergency department (ED) is well recognized, but treatment with opioids is associated with adverse events ranging from minor discomforts to life-threatening events. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of age, sex and route of administration on the incidence of adverse events due to opioid administration in the ED. METHODS: Real-time archived data were analyzed retrospectively in a tertiary care urban hospital. All consecutive patients (≥16 years of age) who were assigned to an ED bed and received an opioid between March 2008 and December 2012 were included. Adverse events were defined as: nausea/vomiting (minor); systolic blood pressure (SBP) subcutaneous > oral). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of adverse events associated with opioid administration in the ED is generally low and is associated with age, sex and route of administration.

ObjectivesIn the fast pace of the Emergency Department (ED), clinicians are in need of tailored screening tools to detect seniors who are at risk of adverse outcomes. We aimed to explore the usefulness of the Bergman-Paris Question (BPQ) to expose potential undetected geriatric syndromes in community-living seniors presenting to the ED.MethodsThis is a planned sub-study of the INDEED multicentre prospective cohort study, including independent or semi-independent seniors (≥65 years old) admitted to hospital after an ED stay ≥8 hours and who were not delirious. Patients were assessed using validated screening tests for 3 geriatric syndromes: cognitive and functional impairment, and frailty. The BPQ was asked upon availability of a relative at enrolment. BPQ’s sensitivity and specificity analyses were used to ascertain outcomes.ResultsA response to the BPQ was available for 171 patients (47% of the main study’s cohort). Of this number, 75.4% were positive (suggesting impairment), and 24.6% were negative. To detect one of the three geriatric syndromes, the BPQ had a sensitivity of 85.4% (95% CI [76.3, 92.0]) and a specificity of 35.4% (95% CI [25.1, 46.7]). Similar results were obtained for each separate outcome. Odds ratio demonstrated a higher risk of presence of geriatric syndromes.ConclusionThe Bergman-Paris Question could be an ED screening tool for possible geriatric syndrome. A positive BPQ should prompt the need of further investigations and a negative BPQ possibly warrants no further action. More research is needed to validate the usefulness of the BPQ for day-to-day geriatric screening by ED professionals or geriatricians.

Background Delirium is underdiagnosed in seniors at emergency departments (EDs) even though it is a frequent complication and is associated with functional and cognitive decline. As frailty is an independent predictor of adverse events in seniors, screening for frailty in EDs may help identify those at risk of delirium. Objectives To assess if screening older patients for frailty in EDs could help identify those at risk of delirium. Methodology This study was part of the multicenter prospective cohort INDEED study. Patients aged ≥ 65 years, initially free of delirium, with an ED stay ≥ 8 h were followed up to 24 h after ward admission. Frailty was assessed at baseline using the Clinical Frailty Scale; seniors with a score ≥ 5/7 were considered frail. Their delirium status was assessed twice daily using the Confusion Assessment Method. Results Among the 335 included patients, delirium occurred in 20/70 frail (28.6%) patients and in 20/265 (7.6%) robust ones. After adjusting for age and sex, the risk of delirium during ED stay was 3.13 (95% confidence interval 1.60–6.21) times higher in frail than in robust patients. Time between arrival to the ED and the incidence of delirium was also shorter for frail patients than for the robust ones (adjusted hazard ratio 2.44, 95% confidence interval 1.26–4.74). Conclusion Increased frailty is associated with increased delirium during ED stays. Screening for frailty at emergency triage could help ED professionals identify seniors at higher risk of delirium.

Study objective Delayed pain treatment is a common problem in emergency departments (EDs). The objective of this study was to examine the effect of age on time to ED patients receiving the first analgesic dose for moderate to severe pain. Methods Real-time, archived data from a tertiary urban hospital and a secondary regional hospital were analyzed post hoc. We included all consecutive adult ED patients (≥ 18 years) on stretchers whose pain intensity was at least 4 (0-10, verbal numerical scale) at triage between March 2008 and December 2012. The primary outcome was time from the beginning of triage to analgesic medication in seniors (≥ 65 years) compared with younger patients. Results A total of 34,213 patients (56% women) were triaged to an ED bed with mean pain intensity of 7.6 (SD ± 1.8). Analgesics were administered to 20,486 patients (59.9%) in a median time of 2.3 hours (interquartile range [IQR] = 3.6). Median time for seniors to receive analgesics was 3.2 hours (IQR = 5.1) compared with 2.1 hours (IQR = 3.1, effect size = 0.19) for younger patients. This represents a 55.2% increase in time to analgesic for seniors. Seniors waited 12 minutes longer to be evaluated by a physician, 20 minutes longer for analgesic prescription, and 35 minutes longer for medication administration. After controlling for confounding factors, they still waited longer to receive pain medication (hazards ratio = 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-1.42) than younger patients. Conclusion Seniors with moderate to severe pain wait 1.1 hours (55.2%) longer than younger patients to receive analgesics. Physicians and nurses (32 and 35 minutes, respectively) contributed to this disparity.