Search

Large clinical trials established the benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with diabetes and with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The early and significant improvement in clinical outcomes is likely explained by effects beyond a reduction in hyperglycemia.The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of empagliflozin on left ventricular (LV) function and volumes, functional capacity, and quality of life (QoL) in nondiabetic HFrEF patients.In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, nondiabetic HFrEF patients (n = 84) were randomized to empagliflozin 10 mg daily or placebo for 6 months. The primary endpoint was change in LV end-diastolic and -systolic volume assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance. Secondary endpoints included changes in LV mass, LV ejection fraction, peak oxygen consumption in the cardiopulmonary exercise test, 6-min walk test, and quality of life.Empagliflozin was associated with a significant reduction of LV end-diastolic volume (-25.1 ± 26.0 ml vs. -1.5 ± 25.4 ml for empagliflozin vs. placebo, respectively; p 0.001) and LV end-systolic volume (-26.6 ± 20.5 ml vs. -0.5 ± 21.9 ml for empagliflozin vs. placebo; p 0.001). Empagliflozin was associated with reductions in LV mass (-17.8 ± 31.9 g vs. 4.1 ± 13.4 g, for empagliflozin vs. placebo, respectively; p 0.001) and LV sphericity, and improvements in LV ejection fraction (6.0 ± 4.2 vs. -0.1 ± 3.9; p 0.001). Patients who received empagliflozin had significant improvements in peak OEmpagliflozin administration to nondiabetic HFrEF patients significantly improves LV volumes, LV mass, LV systolic function, functional capacity, and quality of life when compared with placebo. Our observations strongly support a role for sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in the treatment of HFrEF patients independently of their glycemic status. (Are the "Cardiac Benefits" of Empagliflozin Independent of Its Hypoglycemic Activity? [ATRU-4] [EMPA-TROPISM]; NCT03485222).

Background: SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) improve prognosis in HFrEF patients. We recently demonstrated in a porcine model of non-diabetic HFrEF that empagliflozin (EMPA) ameliorates adverse cardiac remodeling and improves LV systolic function. However, the effect of EMPA on left atrial (LA) dilatation has not yet been studied Hypothesis:: Empagliflozin ameliorates left atrial dilatation in non-diabetic HFrEF patients Methods: The EMPATROPISM clinical trial investigated the efficacy and safety of EMPA in non-diabetic HFrEF patients. 84 patients were randomized to EMPA 10mg daily for 6 months or placebo on top of optimal medical treatment, and were evaluated with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). LA Volumes were quantified by CMR using the Simpson method (the number of slices in the usual short axis SSFP cine sequence was increased to cover both LV and the whole of LA. The primary endpoint was change in LVEDV. Prespecified secondary endpoints were changes in maximal and minimal LA volumes (ΔMax LA Vol and ΔMin LA Vol) at the end of 6 months between both arms Results: 80 patients completed the follow up period. There were no differences at baseline in LVEDV (220±75 vs 209±68mL for EMPA vs placebo, p=0.5) or LVEF (36±8 vs 37±8%, p=0.7). There were no differences at baseline in both groups in either maximal or minimal LA volume (Table). In the primary endpoint, EMPA-treated patients showed decrease in LVEDV and increase in LVEF (ΔLVEDV -25±25 vs -1±25mL, p Conclusions: In HFrEF patients without diabetes, treatment with empagliflozin ameliorates left atrial dilatation. As LA volume is a surrogate for chronic filling pressures, this reduced LA volume suggest improved diastolic function with EMPA

Background: SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) improve prognosis in HFrEF patients. We recently demonstrated in a porcine model of non-diabetic HFrEF that empagliflozin (EMPA) ameliorates adverse cardiac remodeling and improves LV systolic function. However, the effect of EMPA on interstitial myocardial fibrosis (IMF) and aortic stiffness has not yet been studied Hypothesis: Empagliflozin ameliorates IMF and aortic stiffness in non-diabetic HFrEF patients Methods: The EMPATROPISM clinical trial (NCT 03485222) investigated the efficacy and safety of EMPA in non-diabetic HFrEF patients. 84 patients were randomized to EMPA 10mg daily for 6 months or placebo on top of optimal medical treatment, and were evaluated with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). IMF was assessed by CMR using extracellular volume (ECV) by T1 mapping. Aortic stiffness was quantified by pulse wave velocity (PWV) by CMR. The primary endpoint was change in LVEDV. Prespecified secondary endpoints were changes in ECV (ΔECV) and PWV (ΔPWV) at 6 months between both arms Results: 80 patients completed the follow up period. There were no differences at baseline in LVEDV (220±75 vs 209±68mL for EMPA vs placebo, p=0.5) or LVEF (36±8 vs 37±8%, p=0.7). There were no differences at baseline in both groups in either ECV or PWV (Table). In the primary endpoint, EMPA-treated patients showed decrease in LVEDV and increase in LVEF (ΔLVEDV -25±25 vs -1±25mL, p Conclusions: In HFrEF patients without diabetes, treatment with empagliflozin ameliorates IMF and aortic stiffness. This may explain the benefits of SGLT2i in HFrEF even in the absence of diabetes

We appreciate the comments made by Katsiki and colleagues [1] on our paper [2]. We described that empagliflozin administration, in a non-diabetic animal model of heart failure (HF), significantly i...

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a complex metabolic disorder associated with high cardiovascular (CV) risk. Some of the therapeutic strategies are contraindicated in patients with concomitant heart disease. However, the newest antidiabetic medications, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, have shown to significantly reduce CV mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations. The mechanism behind these surprising cardiac benefits remains unclear. Areas covered: This article reviews the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety data for the different SGLT2 inhibitors. Specific attention is devoted to the postulated mechanisms of action for their benefit. The therapeutic efficacy and potential use in different indications outside T2DM such as HF, T1DM, and renal disease are also discussed. Expert opinion: SGLT2 inhibitors have an excellent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. Importantly, SGLT2 inhibitors are a safe and efficacious treatment option for T2DM. Given their cardiac benefits (reduction in HF and death) and the low incidence of adverse events, SGLT2 inhibitors are being currently studied as a treatment for HF also in nondiabetic individuals. These agents seem to represent a shift in the treatment of HF patients regardless their glycemic profile.

The sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors reduce mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations. The underlying mechanisms remain unclear but seem to be irrespective of glucose-lowering properties. This study aims to evaluate the impact of empagliflozin on myocardial biomechanics and correlation with markers of adverse remodeling. Following myocardial infarct induction to create a model of HF, 14 pigs were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either empagliflozin 10 mg daily or placebo for 2 months. Speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) and feature-tracking cardiac magnetic resonance (FTCMR) were performed at baseline and at the end of the study to analyze myocardial deformation. The results were correlated with markers of adverse cardiac remodeling. Empagliflozin significantly improved STE indices. These parameters significantly correlated with adverse cardiac remodeling. In contrast, FTCMR indices showed only a trend toward improved myocardial deformation and without significant correlation with adverse cardiac remodeling. The correlation between both techniques to assess myocardial deformation was low. Empagliflozin enhances myocardial deformation, assessed by STE techniques, in a non-diabetic porcine model of ischemic HF. This may be related to a mitigation of adverse cardiac remodeling following ischemia reperfusion injury. In contrast, FTCMR technique needs further development and validation.

The SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin reduced cardiovascular mortality by 38% and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations by 35% in diabetic patients. We have recently demonstrated the efficacy of empagliflozin in ameliorating HF and improving cardiac function in a non-diabetic porcine model of HF mediated via a switch in myocardial metabolism that enhances cardiac energetics. Therefore, we hypothesized that the cardiac benefits of empagliflozin can also be extended to non-diabetic HF patients. The EMPA-TROPISM clinical trial is a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, trial comparing the efficacy of and safety of empagliflozin in non-diabetic HF patients. Eighty patients with stable HF for over 3 months, LVEF

We appreciate the comments by Baker and colleagues on our paper [(1)][1]. We described that empagliflozin ameliorates adverse cardiac remodeling, enhances systolic function, switches myocardial fuel utilization, and improves myocardial energetics in a nondiabetic heart failure (HF) model. Baker and

The SGTL2 inhibitor empagliflozin (Empa) reduces HF. We have recently demonstrated 1) the mechanism is due to a switch in myocardial metabolism towards ketone bodies (KB) consumption; and 2) KB infusion improves LV systolic function in a porcine HF model. However, there is no information about the