1. Retooling the Traditional Approach to Studying the Belief–Attitude Relationship: Explaining Landowner Buy-In to Incentive Programs.
- Author
-
Sorice, Michael G.
- Subjects
- *
ENDANGERED Species Act of 1973 (U.S.) , *ENDANGERED species laws , *LANDOWNERS , *MAIL surveys , *MULTIPLE regression analysis , *ATTITUDE (Psychology) - Abstract
Perceived threat from traditional command-and-control implementation of the U.S. Endangered Species Act has resulted in the underprovision of endangered species habitat on private lands. Voluntary incentive programs aid recovery by reducing landowner costs and increasing benefits; however, program efficacy is directly related to participation. I used the reasoned action framework to examine landowner attitudes and beliefs about participating. Using data from a mail survey of Texas landowners, I employed two seldom-used methods (structure coefficients and commonality analysis) to enhance explanation from a regression of attitudes on behavioral beliefs. Two of eight measured beliefs (beneficial outcomes for an individual's land and for the target species) accounted for the majority of the variation in attitude. Landowner concerns about future regulations and technical assistance contributed least to attitude. Results provide program administrators with necessary information to create targeted messages to increase participation and thus enhance program efficacy. The use of structure coefficients and commonality analysis highlighted relationships with the greatest explanatory power, as well as those that would have been otherwise missed or marginalized. I recommend these methods be employed in all reasoned-action studies analyzed using multiple regression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF