1. The Significance of Trace Proteinuria
- Author
-
V. Khalili, Alfredo A. Pegoraro, Ramin Sam, I. Hristea, Jose A.L. Arruda, George Dunea, Mashouf Shaykh, and Ashok Kumar Singh
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Proteinuria ,Urinalysis ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Benzenesulfonates ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Salicylates ,Analyse qualitative ,Trace (semiology) ,Qualitative analysis ,Endocrinology ,Nephrology ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Albuminuria ,Humans ,Kidney Diseases ,Clinical significance ,medicine.symptom ,Intensive care medicine ,business ,Reagent Strips - Abstract
Background: The clinical significance of a trace protein reading on urinalysis is unclear, and such a result is often ignored by the clinician. Methods: We examined 185 samples of urine with trace proteinuria by both Chemstrips and sulfosalicylic acid testing, and compared the results with those of urinary albumin and total protein concentrations. Results: Taking for the purposes of this study an arbitrary upper limit of normal of 20 mg/l for albumin and 100 mg/l for total protein concentration, we found abnormal albumin excretion in 87% and abnormal total protein excretion in 88% of trace samples. In this study, a negative urinalysis for protein excluded microalbuminuria in 87% and proteinuria in 78% of cases. Conclusion: Qualitative testing for protein by urinalysis has a high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing or ruling out microalbuminuria. Trace proteinuria usually means microalbuminuria; negative proteinuria tends to rule it out.
- Published
- 2003
- Full Text
- View/download PDF