Search

Endometrial somatically derived yolk sac tumors are characterized by yolk sac morphology with AFP, SALL-4, and/or Glypican-3 immunoexpression. Yolk sac marker expression, however, is not limited to tumors with overt yolk sac histology. Three hundred consecutive endometrial malignancies were assessed for immunomarkers of yolk sac differentiation. Of these, 9% expressed ≥1 yolk sac marker, including 29% of high-grade tumors. Only 3 (1%) met morphologic criteria for yolk sac differentiation; these were originally diagnosed as serous, high-grade NOS, and dedifferentiated carcinoma. Two were MMR-intact and comprised exclusively of yolk sac elements, while the dedifferentiated case was MMR deficient and had a background low-grade endometrioid carcinoma; this case also showed BRG1 loss. All 3 were INI1 intact. Nonspecific yolk sac marker expression was seen in 14 carcinosarcomas, 4 endometrioid, 2 serous, 1 clear cell, 1 dedifferentiated, 1 mixed serous/clear cell, and 1 mesonephric-like carcinoma. INI1 was intact in all cases; one showed BRG1 loss. Twenty were MMR-intact, and 4 were MMR deficient. All MMR-deficient cases with yolk sac marker expression, both with and without true yolk sac morphology, had no evidence of residual disease on follow-up, whereas 82% of MMR-intact cases developed recurrent/metastatic disease. In summary, endometrial somatically derived yolk sac tumors were rare but under-recognized. While AFP immunostaining was specific for this diagnosis, Glypican-3 and SALL-4 expression was seen in a variety of other high-grade carcinomas. INI1 loss was not associated with yolk sac morphology or immunomarker expression in the endometrium, and BRG1 loss was rare. All patients with MMR-deficient carcinomas with yolk sac immunoexpression +/- morphology were disease-free on follow-up, whereas the majority of MMR-intact cancers showed aggressive disease., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: The authors have disclosed that they have no significant relationships with, or financial interest in, any commercial companies pertaining to this article., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

An unusual case of a polypoid, malignant gastric tumor in a 62-year-old man is presented. Endoscopy and subsequent polypectomy revealed an 8.5 × 6.5 × 4.5-cm lesion in the body of the stomach. Microscopy showed surface dysplasia with an invasive adenocarcinoma displaying prominent tubulopapillary areas composed of large vacuolated cells, pleomorphic nuclei, and occasional cytoplasmic hyaline globules. This component then blended with tubular structures lined by more primitive-appearing vacuolated cells embedded within a stroma made up of cellular primitive, high-grade blastemalike areas and less cellular, more pleomorphic foci with spindle and several bizarre, large cells. Immunohistochemistry showed the adenocarcinoma and primitive tubules to be strongly SALL4 and epithelial marker positive but with only focal expression of α-fetoprotein and glypican-3. The stromal component made up of blastemalike areas displayed strong immunoreactivity for glypican-3. The pleomorphic stromal areas were negative for all markers, including epithelial and muscle markers. The overall morphology and expression of primitive oncofetal proteins, especially SALL4 and glypican-3, are in keeping with this being a primitive adenocarcinoma showing fetal gutlike differentiation with an accompanying blastomalike component, a combination not previously described in a primary gastric cancer., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) of the ovary is the surface epithelial neoplasm most often confused with primitive germ cell tumors, particularly yolk sac tumor (YST) and dysgerminoma. OCT3/4 has proven to be a sensitive and relatively specific marker for the latter entity, but existing markers for YST are limited. Recent studies suggest that glypican-3 (GPC3), an oncofetal protein expressed in fetal liver and malignant tumors of hepatocytic lineage, is also expressed in germ cell tumors, particularly YST. To investigate whether GPC3 is useful in distinguishing YST from ovarian CCC, we studied the expression of GPC3 in a large series of ovarian neoplasms and compared it to the expression profiles of CK7 and alpha-fetoprotein. Tissue microarrays containing over 400 benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms, including 34 CCCs were stained with monoclonal GPC3 (clone 1G12, Biomosaics, Burlington, VT). These arrays contained a wide assortment of ovarian surface epithelial neoplasms and sex cord stromal neoplasms, as well as germ cell tumors. Full paraffin tissue sections from 32 YSTs and 10 CCCs were also assessed. All but one YST (97%), including those associated with mixed germ cell tumor were positive for GPC3, whereas all teratomas and embryonal carcinomas were negative. Both cytoplasmic and membrane staining were present in the positive cases, with no background staining. The syncytiotrophoblastic cells in the germ cell tumors and placental villi included in the arrays were also positive for GPC3. Most CCCs (83%) were completely negative for GPC3, as were 99% serous, 94% endometrioid, and 100% mucinous tumors. Five CCCs exhibited focal, moderate to strong GPC3 expression and in 2 the expression was focal and weak. All other tissues, including normal ovary were negative for GPC3. GPC3 seems to be a promising diagnostic marker for differentiating YST from ovarian CCC (P < 0.0001). Because GPC3 may be associated with alpha-fetoprotein expression, further studies are required to determine the utility of GPC3 in differentiating YST from CCC with hepatoid differentiation.