Search

Objectives Endoscopic and endoscopic-assisted approaches to the parapharyngeal space have been reported; however, their potential for vascular exposure has not been previously assessed. This study aims to compare the potential exposure and control of the parapharyngeal internal carotid artery (ppICA) via various approaches. Design and Main Outcome Measures Ten cadaveric specimens were dissected bilaterally, exposing the ppICA via endonasal, transoral, and transcervical approaches. Length of the exposed vessel and potential control were assessed (feasibility and time required to place an encircling suture). Results Endoscopic transoral and transcervical-transmandibular approaches expose a significantly longer segment of the ppICA (6.89 and 7.09 cm) than the transoral and endonasal approaches. Vascular control was achieved via endoscopic-endonasal, endoscopic- transoral, and open techniques in 121.6, 64.8, and 5.2 seconds, respectively. Conclusion Histopathology, goals of surgery, and familiarity of the surgeon with each technique may ultimately determine the choice of approach; however, this study suggests that exposure of the ppICA by endoscopic-assisted transoral approach is comparable to that of a transcervical-transmandibular approach. Vascular controlwas feasible under elective circumstances. However, the difficulty varied widely, potentially reflecting the challenges of controlling an injured ppICA. However, one must note that active bleeding obscures the surgical field in ways that may impair ppICA control. Furthermore, the results may not reflect clinical scenarios where tumor distorts the surgical field. Nonetheless, the study suggests that, in properly selected patients, the endoscopicassisted transoral approach avoids problems associated with unsightly scars, mandibular osteotomy, and facial nerve manipulation, whereas, the transcervical--transmandibular approach offers the swiftest vascular control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objective The inframeatal area represents a challenging region for skull base surgeons. Various surgical corridors have been described to access this area and frequently are used in combination. Recent studies describe the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) as an established route for midline regions, particularly medial to the internal carotid arteries (ICA). We sought to evaluate the accessibility, maneuverability, and freedom of movement of the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach to the inframeatal region. Methods An EEA combining a middle and an inferior transclival corridor with an infrapetrous and a supracondylar lateral expansion was performed in 5 embalmed human cadaveric heads. The area of exposure and the surgical freedom to access the inframeatal area were calculated. The angle of attack and distances from the lacerum segment of the ICA to several anatomical targets also were measured. Our database was searched to select clinical case examples. Results The EEA provided an exposure area of 101.26 ± 16.66 mm2 and an area of surgical freedom of 1208.50 ± 507.01 mm2. The angles of attack in both the sagittal and axial planes were wider at the lacerum segment of the ICA and narrower at the dural entrance zone of cranial nerves VII/VIII. Three chondrosarcomas are presented as case illustrations. Conclusions The EEA is a feasible route to the inframeatal area. This approach provides a safe working corridor for lesions in this region, as shown by the anatomical and clinical findings presented here. Comparative studies and large case series are warranted to further establish its clinical value. Highlights • EEA is surgically feasible for approaching lesions at the inframeatal area. • EEA inframeatal approach may avoid the need for ICA and eustachian tube mobilization. • Clinical application of this approach includes chordoma and cholesterol granuloma. • Paramedial lesions such as chondrosarcomas may warrant a combined strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]