Search

Background/Aims: Recently, endoscopic detachable snare ligation (EDSL) has become increasingly common as treatment for colonic diverticular hemorrhage. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EDSL in comparison with endoscopic clipping (EC) as treatment for colonic diverticular hemorrhage. Methods: From April 2013 to September 2017, 131 patients were treated with EDSL or EC at the Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital. We retrospectively evaluated patient characteristics and clinical outcomes, including early rebleeding rates (rebleeding within 30 days after initial hemostasis) and complications for each procedure. Results: Of 131 patients, 44 and 87 were treated with EDSL and EC respectively. We initially achieved endoscopic hemostasis in all patients. The early rebleeding rate was significantly lower for EDSL (6.8%, 3 patients) than for EC (23.0%, 20 patients). There were no differences in the total procedure time (43 vs. 45 min, p = 0.84) or time to hemostasis after identification of bleeding site (12 vs. 10 min, p = 0.23). There were no severe complications following EDSL. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that EDSL is superior to EC as treatment for colonic diverticular hemorrhage. EDSL may provide improvements in the clinical course of patients with colonic diverticular hemorrhage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Study Aims: Colonic diverticular hemorrhage is the most common cause of lower intestinal bleeding. We tried to develop a convenient and reliable hemostatic method, endoscopic detachable snare ligation (EDSL), to treat diverticular hemorrhage and retrospectively explored its safety and efficacy.Patients and Methods: The definitive bleeding diverticulum was ligated with a detachable snare, instead of a rubber band, in a procedure similar to endoscopic band ligation. Removal of the scope to attach a ligation device and reinsertion for treatment are not needed in this method.Results: From November 2013 to September 2014, EDSL was used to treat 8 patients with colonic diverticular hemorrhage. The mean procedure time required for hemostasis after identification of the bleeding diverticulum was 5 ± 2 minutes. Sustained hemostasis was achieved in 7 patients (88 %), and early rebleeding occurred in 1 patient, in whom the applied suction seemed inadequate. No complications occurred in any patient.Conclusions: EDSL may be a safe and effective treatment for colonic diverticular hemorrhage. However, additional studies are warranted to confirm these initial exploratory data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]