Search

Objective: To determine in-hospital costs associated with performing an EEA to anterior skull base pathology and to identify drivers of cost variability for patients undergoing endoscopic anterior skull base surgery. Methods: All endoscopic anterior skull base surgeries performed over a period from January 1st, 2015 to October 24th, 2017 were evaluated. The electronic medical record was reviewed for patient factors, tumor characteristics, and cost variables associated with each hospital stay and univariate analysis was performed using Stata software. Results: An EEA was associated with an average total in-hospital cost of $44 545. Compared to patients undergoing a transsphenoidal approach to pituitary tumor resection, EEA patients incurred higher in-hospital costs across all variables including a total cost increase of $15 921 (95% confidence interval $5720-26 122, P =.002). Univariate analysis of all endoscopic anterior skull base surgery patients showed a cost increase of $30 616 associated with post-operative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak ($10 420-50 811, P =.004), $14 610 with post-operative diabetes insipidus (DI) ($4610-24 609, P =.004), and $11 522 with African-American patients relative to Caucasian patients ($3049-19 995, P =.008). Conclusions: Patients who undergo endoscopic EEA for resection of anterior skull base tumors typically incur greater in-hospital costs than patients undergoing a standard TSA. Post-operative complications such as CSF leak and DI, as well as ethnicity, are significant drivers of cost-variability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Concha bullosa (CB) alters the intranasal anatomy and may influence the buffering of inhalant allergens and the inflammatory microenvironment central to chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). By investigating the link between allergies and CB, we can examine this theoretical benefit, which has implications on the extent of resection in endoscopic sinus surgery.Methods: Forty-three adults treated between 2010 and March 2014 with chronic sinonasal symptoms were retrospectively analyzed by skin prick allergy testing, maxillofacial computed tomography scan, and Lund-Mackay score. x03C7;2 analysis and t tests were employed to determine statistical significance.Results: Subjects were divided into 30 positive cases and 13 pan-negative allergy controls. No difference in CB prevalence was observed between those with positive (70%) and those with negative (69.2%) allergy tests (p = 0.93). Furthermore, no association between CB and Lund-Mackay score was identified (p = 0.69). Overall, 83.3% of CB were located in the middle turbinate, 16.7% in the superior turbinate, and 20% occurred in the middle turbinate bilaterally.Conclusions: Although an enlarged, pneumatized turbinate could function as a physical barrier to inhalant allergens, documented allergies demonstrate no association with CB formation. Furthermore, this study finds no correlation between CB and radiographic evidence of CRS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Inverted papillomas are benign sinonasal tumors that can recur or become cancerous. The mainstay of treatment is surgical resection. We summarize the biology of inverted papillomas and review surgical outcomes in an effort to define the current treatment strategy. Inverted papillomas (IP) are the most common sinonasal tumor with a tendency for recurrence, potential attachment to the orbit and skull base, and risk of malignant degeneration into squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). While the overall rate of recurrence has decreased with the widespread adoption of high-definition endoscopic optics and advanced surgical tools, there remain challenges in managing tumors that are multiply recurrent or involve vital neurovascular structures. Here, we review the state-of-the-art diagnostic tools for IP and IP-degenerated SCC, contemporary surgical management, and propose a surveillance protocol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims: Tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) are challenging tumors for surgical resection. Endoscopic endonasal (EE) approaches to these lesions have not been directly compared to open craniotomy in a controlled trial. Methods: We searched Medline and Embase online databases for English-language articles containing key words related to TSMs. Data were pooled, including 5 of our own patients reported here for the first time. Metaregression was used and a decision-analytical model was constructed to compare outcomes between open microsurgery and EE approaches. Results: The overall quality of life (QOL) was not significantly different between the approaches (p = 0.410); however, there were large differences in individual complication rates. The Monte Carlo simulation yielded an overall average QOL in craniotomy patients of 0.915 and in endoscopic patients of 0.952. Endoscopy had a higher CSF leak rate (26.8 vs. 3.5%, p < 0.001) but a lower rate of injury to the optic apparatus (1.4 vs. 9.2%, p < 0.001) compared with craniotomy. The 3-year recurrence rates were not statistically different (p = 0.529). Conclusion: EE resection of TSMs appears to be a comparable alternative to traditional open microsurgical resection with respect to overall QOL based on available publications. A meaningful comparison of recurrence rates will require a longer follow-up. Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]