Search

Background and Purpose: Although conservative management is indicated in most cases of primary obstructed megaureter (POM), surgery is still indicated when POM is associated with increasing dilation, symptoms, or progressive renal damage. Surgery is associated with a significant rate of complications, however, especially in the case of very large ureter in the first year of life. A valid alternative could be endoscopic high pressure balloon dilation (EHPBD) of the vesicoureteral junction (VUJ). We report the first experience with EHPBD in patients under 1 year of age who were affected by severe POM., Patients and Methods: Five patients, aged between 6 and 12 months, were treated with EHPBD. In all patients, preoperative renal ultrasonography showed a distal ureteral dilation ≥15 mm that increased at later evaluations; an obstructive pattern was detected by preoperative diuretic renography. An 8-9,8 F cystoscope, and a 3F balloon catheter (balloon maximum diameter 4 mm) was used. The VUJ was dilated for 5 minutes at 12 to 14 atm. A 4.7F Double-J stent was then positioned and left in place for 6 to 8 weeks. Ultrasonography was performed every 3 months, and renography and voiding cystourethrography the fourth month after the EHPBD., Results: No operative complications were observed. All the patients showed an improvement at the ultrasonography postoperative follow-up, and there was no evidence of obstruction/reflux at the postoperative check up., Conclusions: Our preliminary results seem to indicate that EHPBD is a feasible, safe, and successful procedure. It could play a role as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery in cases of POM that necessitate intervention in the first year of life. Longer follow-up is necessary to verify the stability of these results.

To date, rigid operative ureterorenoscopy with ultrasound lithotripsy for the treatment of ureteral calculi has been performed only in adults or older children. The size of the instrument with the working channel for the ultrasound probe has been considered unsuitable for delicate anatomical structures, such as those of children younger than 4 years. We performed 8 ureterorenoscopic examinations in 7 patients (3 boys) 3 to 8 years old and have demonstrated that the 11.5F ureteroscope can be inserted without difficulty into the ureteral meatus of a 3-year-old boy. Introduction of the instrument is facilitated by the use of the Perez-Castro irrigation pump. This procedure does not lead to any urethral or ureteral damage, nor is vesicoureteral reflux shown on a postoperative cystogram. This technique allows extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy to be extended also to small children, offering the possibility of easy and successful management of any residual steinstrasse.

Authors from Rome evaluated parental preference for treatment in children with grade III VUR. Parents were provided with detailed information about the three treatment options: antibiotic treatment, open surgery, endoscopic treatment. Most parents chose endoscopic management; with this in mind, the authors proposed a new treatment algorithm for VUR. OBJECTIVE To assess parental preference (acknowledged in treatment guidelines as important when choosing therapy) about treatments for vesico-ureteric reflux (VUR, commonly associated with urinary tract infection and which can cause long-term renal damage if left untreated), as at present there is no definitive treatment for VUR of moderate severity (grade III). SUBJECTS AND METHODS The parents of 100 children with grade III reflux (38 boys and 62 girls, mean age 4 years, range 1–15) were provided with detailed information about the three treatment options available for treating VUR (antibiotic prophylaxis, open surgery and endoscopic treatment), including the mode of action, cure rate and possible complications, and the practical advantages and disadvantages. They were then presented with a questionnaire asking them to choose their preferred treatment. RESULTS Most parents preferred endoscopic treatment (80%), rather than antibiotic prophylaxis (5%) or open surgery (2%); 13% could not decide among the three options and endoscopic treatment was recommended. CONCLUSION Given the strong preference for endoscopic treatment we propose a new algorithm for treating VUR; endoscopic treatment would be considered as the first option for persistent VUR, except in severe cases where open surgery would still be recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]