Search

Background: Surgical scars are a significant cosmetic problem, especially when in exposed areas such as the anterior neck. To avoid or reduce visible scarring, diverse innovative surgical approaches to the neck have been introduced. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the endoscopic resection using the retroauricular approach for submandibular gland excision., Methods: The present study enrolled 48 patients who underwent conventional transcervical submandibular gland excision and 23 patients who underwent endoscope-assisted retroauricular approach submandibular gland excision, from February 2014 through February 2018 at the Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology of the AC Camargo Cancer Center, in Sao Paulo, Brazil. The surgical outcomes were retrospectively reviewed., Results: In the conventional group, 26 (54%) patients were male. The mean age was 49.3 years (range 22-81). Twenty-two patients (46%) had sialoadenitis; twenty-one (44%) had benign and five (10%) had malignant tumors. The mean total surgical time was 86.4 min (range 40-180), and the mean total length of hospital stay was 1.3 days. Twenty-seven (56%) patients suffered from local postoperative complications in the neck. In the retroauricular group, 14 (61%) patients were male. The mean age was 44.1 years (range 24-71 years). Seven patients (31%) had sialoadenitis, twelve (53%) had benign tumors and four (16%) had malignant tumors. The mean total surgical time was 86.4 min (range 75-300 min), and the mean total length of hospital stay was 1.2 days. Twelve (53%) patients suffered from local postoperative complications in the neck. No surgical site infections or systemic complications were described., Conclusions: The retroauricular endoscopic-assisted submandibular gland resection is feasible, with excellent cosmetic results and no significant complication rate increase, and can be a safe potential surgical alternative for patients who are motivated to avoid a visible neck scar.

There has been a significant increase in concern towards improving aesthetic and functional outcomes without compromising the oncologic effectiveness in head and neck surgery. The aim of the current study is to assess the feasibility and oncological outcome of the retroauricular approach for endoscopic and robot-assisted selective neck dissection (SND) for oral cancer in comparison with the conventional SND. A retrospective single institute cohort study was designed. Patients undergoing an SND for oral cavity carcinoma were included and allocated into two groups: (1) retroauricular approach group for endoscopic-assisted or robot-assisted SND or (2) transcervical approach group for the conventional SND. Primary endpoint was the perioperative and postoperative treatment outcomes. Secondary endpoint was the early oncologic outcome. Sixty patients were included (17 retroauricular; 43 conventional). For the primary outcome, only a significant longer operative time in the retroauricular group was identified. No unintentional injury or conversion to the conventional surgery was recorded. There was no significant difference identified in the early oncologic outcome, including number of retrieved lymph nodes and disease-free survival. Postoperative aesthetic results were considered superior when subjectively compared to the conventional approaches. Endoscopic and robot-assisted SND via a retroauricular approach is feasible, safe, and oncologically efficient when compared with the conventional surgery in a short follow-up scenario. It can be used for selected cases with a clear cosmetic benefit. However, further research with longer follow-up and patient satisfaction analysis is mandatory.