Search

Objective: Describe a novel treatment approach to a rare bony neoplasm in the frontal sinus. Study Design: Case report. Methods: Retrospective chart review of an osteoblastoma of the frontal sinuses complicated by a right orbital mucocle. Demographic, endoscopic, radiographic, pathologic, and surgical data were collected for synthesis and review. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from 1977 to 2017 to review publications of surgical management of frontal sinus neoplasms. Results: A single female patient with a large frontal sinus osteoblastoma was successfully treated with a bilateral transorbital and transnasal approach. The right orbital mucocele was marsupialized into the frontal sinus. Gross total resection of the tumor was achieved, with complete resolution of the presurgical morbidity. The surgery was tolerated well without iatrogenic injury or sequela. Conclusion: Frontal sinus osteoblastoma is a rare condition. Complete surgical excision is considered curative. Various endoscopic and open approaches have been described. Here we show the feasibility and efficacy of a multiportal strategy in the successful management of a large frontal sinus osteoblastoma complicated by a right orbital mucocele. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Surgical skill development outside the operating room aims to improve technique and subsequent patient safety. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between technical and cognitive skills with cadaveric endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) performance and change in ESS performance before and after implementation of a dedicated ESS simulation‐based and knowledge‐based curriculum. Methods: A before‐after study design was implemented among 10 medical students and 10 junior otolaryngology residents. Participants completed a knowledge‐based, multiple‐choice ESS pretest and watched an ESS prosection video. Participants performed 9 tasks on a previously validated low‐cost, low‐technology, nonbiologic sinus surgery task trainer followed by cadaveric maxillary antrostomy and anterior ethmoidectomy. Participants then completed a simulation‐based and knowledge‐based ESS curriculum followed by a repeat cadaveric maxillary antrostomy and anterior ethmoidectomy. Performance was graded with a 5‐point global rating scale (GRS) and a 5‐point ESS‐specific checklist. Results: We observed a stronger correlation between the multiple‐choice, knowledge‐based, ESS pretest scores and cadaveric ESS GRS score (r = 0.73) than between task trainer performance and cadaveric ESS GRS score (r = 0.43). We also noted a significant increase in precurriculum vs postcurriculum mean ± standard deviation (SD) cadaveric ESS checklist scores for both medical students (1.18 ± 0.25 vs 2.58 ± 0.57; p = 0.0002) and residents (2.09 ± 0.78 vs 2.88 ± 0.54; p = 0.023). The greatest improvements for residents were in performance of uncinectomy, enlargement of maxillary os, and identification of the bulla. Conclusion: These findings provide evidence supporting the use of ESS training curricula outside the operating room. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Topical vasoconstrictors and intravenous tranexamic acid (IV TXA) are safe and efficacious to decrease bleeding and improve the surgical field during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). The purpose of this study was to investigate practice patterns, awareness of clinical evidence, and comfort levels among anesthesia providers regarding these hemostatic agents for ESS. Methods: A total of 767 attending anesthesiologists, residents, and certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) at 5 United States academic centers were invited to participate in a survey regarding their experience with IV TXA and 3 topical vasoconstrictor medications (oxymetazoline, epinephrine, and cocaine) during ESS. Results: 330 (47%) anesthesia providers responded to the electronic survey. 113 (97%) residents, 92 (83%) CRNAs, and 52 (68%) attendings managed 5 or fewer ESS cases per month. Two-thirds of providers had not reviewed efficacy or safety literature for these hemostatic agents. Oxymetazoline was perceived safest, followed by epinephrine, IV TXA, and cocaine. Respondents considered potential side effects over surgical field visibility when selecting agents. The majority of providers had no formal training on these agents for ESS, but indicated interest in educational opportunities. Conclusion: Many anesthesia providers are unfamiliar with safety and efficacy literature regarding agents used to improve hemostasis for ESS, highlighting a need for development of relevant educational resources. Rhinologic surgeons have an opportunity to communicate with anesthesia colleagues on the use of hemostatic agents to improve the surgical field during ESS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]