Search

Background: Severe pancreatitis may result in a disrupted pancreatic duct, which is associated with a complicated clinical course. Diagnosis of a disrupted pancreatic duct is not standardized in clinical practice or international guidelines. We performed a systematic review of the literature on imaging modalities for diagnosing a disrupted pancreatic duct in patients with acute pancreatitis., Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases to identify all studies evaluating diagnostic modalities for the diagnosis of a disrupted pancreatic duct in acute pancreatitis. All data regarding diagnostic accuracy were extracted., Results: We included 8 studies, evaluating five different diagnostic modalities in 142 patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Study quality was assessed, with proportionally divided high and low risk of bias and low applicability concerns in 75% of the studies. A sensitivity of 100% was reported for endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The sensitivity of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with or without secretin was 83%. A sensitivity of 92% was demonstrated for a combined cohort of secretin-magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. A sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 50% was found for amylase measurements in drain fluid compared with ERCP., Conclusions: This review suggests that various diagnostic modalities are accurate in diagnosing a disrupted pancreatic duct in patients with acute pancreatitis. Amylase measurement in drain fluid should be standardized. Given the invasive nature of other modalities, secretin-magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography would be recommended as first diagnostic modality. Further prospective studies, however, are needed.

Background: Idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP) has a 25 % pancreatitis recurrence rate. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) may diagnose treatable causes of IAP and hence prevent recurrence. The goal of this systematic review with meta-analysis is to determine the diagnostic yield of EUS and its impact on recurrence., Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for English studies on EUS in adults with IAP. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield. Secondary outcomes included recurrence. Methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 score. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled diagnostic yield and risk ratio with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model with inverse variance method., Results: 22 studies were included, with 1490 IAP patients who underwent EUS. Overall diagnostic yield was 59 % (874 /1490; 95 %CI 52 % - 66 %). The most common etiologies were biliary (429 /1490; 30 %, 95 %CI 21 % - 41 %) and chronic pancreatitis (271 /1490; 12 %, 95 %CI 8 % - 19 %). In 2 % of patients, neoplasms were detected (45 /1490; 95 %CI 1 % - 4 %). There was no difference in yield between patients with or without recurrent IAP before EUS (risk ratio 0.89, 95 %CI 0.71 - 1.11)., Conclusions: EUS is able to identify a potential etiology in the majority of patients with IAP, detecting mostly biliary origin or chronic pancreatitis, but also neoplasms in 2 % of patients. EUS may be associated with a reduction of recurrence rate. Future studies should include complete diagnostic work-up and preferably include patients with a first episode of IAP only., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP) remains a dilemma for physicians as it is uncertain whether patients with IAP may actually have an occult aetiology. It is unclear to what extent additional diagnostic modalities such as endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are warranted after a first episode of IAP in order to uncover this aetiology. Failure to timely determine treatable aetiologies delays appropriate treatment and might subsequently cause recurrence of acute pancreatitis. Therefore, the aim of the Pancreatitis of Idiopathic origin: Clinical added value of endoscopic UltraSonography (PICUS) Study is to determine the value of routine EUS in determining the aetiology of pancreatitis in patients with a first episode of IAP., Methods and Analysis: PICUS is designed as a multicentre prospective cohort study of 106 patients with a first episode of IAP after complete standard diagnostic work-up, in whom a diagnostic EUS will be performed. Standard diagnostic work-up will include a complete personal and family history, laboratory tests including serum alanine aminotransferase, calcium and triglyceride levels and imaging by transabdominal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography after clinical recovery from the acute pancreatitis episode. The primary outcome measure is detection of aetiology by EUS. Secondary outcome measures include pancreatitis recurrence rate, severity of recurrent pancreatitis, readmission, additional interventions, complications, length of hospital stay, quality of life, mortality and costs, during a follow-up period of 12 months., Ethics and Dissemination: PICUS is conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. Five medical ethics review committees assessed PICUS (Medical Ethics Review Committee of Academic Medical Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Radboud University Medical Center, Erasmus Medical Center and Maastricht University Medical Center). The results will be submitted for publication in an international peer-reviewed journal., Trial Registration Number: Netherlands Trial Registry (NL7066). Prospectively registered., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Background: A forward-viewing linear (FVL) echoendoscope has been developed with the aim of overcoming some of the limitations of standard curved linear-array (CLA) echoendoscopes. There are no existing studies comparing the performance of the two echoendoscopes for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) of solid lesions other than subepithelial lesions., Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial with a noninferiority design comparing FVL vs. CLA echoendoscopes in patients with solid lesions of the gastrointestinal tract or adjacent organs. Primary outcomes were successful identification of the lesion and success of EUS-TA. Secondary outcomes were safety, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of the two different scopes for EUS-TA., Results: 126 patients with solid lesions were randomly assigned to the CLA group (63 patients) or the FVL group (63 patients). The two groups were homogeneous with no differences in terms of needle type used, mean number of passes, and site of EUS-TA. No differences were observed between the FVL vs. CLA scopes in identification of the lesion (96.8 % vs. 98.4 %; P  > 0.99) and technical success of EUS-TA (92.1 % vs. 96.8 %; P  = 0.44). No adverse events occurred. Overall, diagnostic accuracy (77.8 % vs. 84.1 %), sensitivity (76.6 % vs. 84.1 %), and specificity (81.3 % vs. 84.2 %) did not differ between the two groups., Conclusions: Our results strongly suggest that the FVL echoendoscope is noninferior to the CLA scope for the detection and performance of EUS-TA in patients with solid lesions of the gastrointestinal tract and adjacent organs. In addition, the FVL scope has the same diagnostic yield, accuracy, and safety as the CLA scope., Competing Interests: Prof. Fockens is a consultant for Olympus Medical. Prof. Deviere has received research support for IRB-approved studies from Olympus Medical. Prof. Costamagna is a consultant for Olympus Medical and has received research grants from Olympus Medical., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: The separate value of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), multidetector computed tomography (CT), and 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the optimal sequence in staging esophageal cancer has not been investigated adequately., Methods: The staging records of 216 consecutive operable patients with esophageal cancer were reviewed blindly. Different staging strategies were analyzed, and the likelihood ratio (LR) of each module was calculated conditionally on individual patient characteristics. A logistic regression approach was used to determine the most favorable staging strategy., Results: Initial EUS results were not significantly related to the LRs of initial CT and FDG-PET results. The positive LR (LR+) of EUS-fine-needle aspiration (FNA) was 4, irrespective of CT and FDG-PET outcomes. The LR+ of FDG-PET varied from 13 (negative CT) to 6 (positive CT). The LR+ of CT ranged from 3-4 (negative FDG-PET) to 2-3 (positive FDG-PET). Age, histology, and tumor length had no significant impact on the LRs of the three diagnostic tests., Conclusions: This study argues in favor of PET/CT rather than EUS as a predictor of curative resectability in esophageal cancer. EUS does not correspond with either CT or FDG-PET. LRs of FDG-PET were substantially different between subgroups of negative and positive CT results and vice versa.

Objective: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and MRI are promising tests to detect precursors and early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in high-risk individuals (HRIs). It is unclear which screening technique is to be preferred. We aimed to compare the efficacy of EUS and MRI in their ability to detect clinically relevant lesions in HRI., Design: Multicentre prospective study. The results of 139 asymptomatic HRI (>10-fold increased risk) undergoing first-time screening by EUS and MRI are described. Clinically relevant lesions were defined as solid lesions, main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and cysts ≥10 mm. Results were compared in a blinded, independent fashion., Results: Two solid lesions (mean size 9 mm) and nine cysts ≥10 mm (mean size 17 mm) were detected in nine HRI (6%). Both solid lesions were detected by EUS only and proved to be a stage I PDAC and a multifocal pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia 2. Of the nine cysts ≥10 mm, six were detected by both imaging techniques and three were detected by MRI only. The agreement between EUS and MRI for the detection of clinically relevant lesions was 55%. Of these clinically relevant lesions detected by both techniques, there was a good agreement for location and size., Conclusions: EUS and/or MRI detected clinically relevant pancreatic lesions in 6% of HRI. Both imaging techniques were complementary rather than interchangeable: contrary to EUS, MRI was found to be very sensitive for the detection of cystic lesions of any size; MRI, however, might have some important limitations with regard to the timely detection of solid lesions., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/)

Background: EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has emerged as an alternative rescue method in patients with failed ERCP. Opportunities for teaching and training are limited because of a low case volume at most centers., Objective: To evaluate a stereolithography/3-dimensional (3D) printing bile duct prototype for teaching and training in EUS-BD., Design: Prospective observational feasibility study., Setting: Tertiary referral center., Subjects: Twenty endosonographers attending an interventional EUS workshop., Intervention: A prototype of a dilated biliary system was prepared by computer-aided design and 3D printing. The study participants performed guidewire manipulation and EUS-BD procedures (antegrade procedure and/or choledochoduodenostomy) on the prototype. Participants were scored with the device on a scale of 1 to 5 via a questionnaire. Participants' success rate for various steps of the EUS-BD procedure was noted., Main Outcome Measurements: Subjective and objective evaluation of the prototype regarding its overall applicability, quality of radiographic and EUS images, and 4 steps of EUS-BD procedure (needle puncture, guidewire manipulation, tract dilation, stent placement)., Results: Fifteen participants returned the questionnaire, and 10 completed all 4 steps of EUS-BD. The median score for overall utility was 4, whereas that for EUS and US views was 5. Participants with experience in performing more than 20 EUS-BD procedures scored the prototype significantly lower for stent placement (P = .013) and equivalent for needle puncture, tract dilation, and wire manipulation. The success rate of various steps was 100% for needle puncture and tract dilation, 82.35% for wire manipulation, and 80% for stent placement. The mean overall procedure time was 18 minutes., Limitations: Small number of participants., Conclusion: The 3D printing bile duct prototype appears suitable for teaching of and training in the various steps of EUS-BD. Further studies are required to elucidate its role., (Copyright © 2015 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) are considered useful techniques in the evaluation of pancreatic cysts. Aim of this study was to prospectively compare the diagnostic value of these techniques., Methods: This study included consecutive patients who underwent MRI, EUS, and EUS-FNA for a pancreatic cyst that was eventually resected surgically. Observers scored for cyst characteristics, a distinction between mucinous and non-mucinous cysts and a suspicion of malignancy. The interobserver agreement between MRI and EUS was calculated., Results: A total of 32 patients were included. Sensitivity for diagnosing a mucinous cyst was 78% for EUS versus 91% for MRI. Sensitivity for detecting malignancy was 25% (1/4) and 50% (2/4) for EUS and MRI respectively. Sensitivity of EUS-FNA for diagnosing a mucinous cyst (positive cytology and/or CEA >192 ng/ml) was 61%. Sensitivity for detecting malignancy (positive cytology) was 1/4 (25%). Interobserver agreement between MRI and EUS for the features was poor to fair., Conclusion: MRI and EUS are comparable techniques for the morphological characterization of pancreatic cysts. Combined sensitivity of EUS and MRI was higher than the sensitivity of one of the techniques alone. For diagnosing a mucinous cyst, FNA findings showed a low sensitivity, but a high specificity.

Over the past 2 decades, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration has evolved to become an indispensable tool for tissue acquisition in patients with gastrointestinal tumors. The technique is useful for biopsy of mucosal and submucosal lesions in which prior endoscopic biopsies have been nondiagnostic; to sample peri-intestinal structures such as lymph nodes; and to sample masses in the pancreas, liver, adrenal glands, gallbladder, and bile duct. Also, with the advent of neoadjuvant therapies for diseases such as pancreatic cancer, most patients require a tissue diagnosis before initiating treatment. This review provides a perspective on technical issues that are key for best practices in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration., (Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To assess the characteristics and quality of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in a large panel of endosonographers., Methods: A survey was conducted during the 13th annual live course of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) held in Amsterdam, Netherlands. A 2-page questionnaire was developed for the study. Content validity of the questionnaire was determined based on input by experts in the field and a review of the relevant literature. It contained 30 questions that pertained to demographics and the current practice for EUS-FNA of responders, including sampling technique, sample processing, cytopathological diagnosis and sensitivity of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of solid mass lesions. One hundred and sixty-one endosonographers who attended the course were asked to answer the survey. This allowed assessing the current practice of EUS-FNA as well as the self-reported sensitivity of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of solid mass lesions. We also examined which factors were associated with a self-reported sensitivity of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of solid mass lesions > 80%., Results: Completed surveys were collected from 92 (57.1%) of 161 endosonographers who attended the conference. The endosonographers had been practicing endoscopy and EUS for 12.5 ± 7.8 years and 4.8 ± 4.1 years, respectively; one third of them worked in a hospital with an annual caseload > 100 EUS-FNA. Endoscopy practices were located in 29 countries, including 13 countries in Western Europe that totaled 75.3% of the responses. Only one third of endosonographers reported a sensitivity for the diagnosis of solid mass lesions > 80% (interquartile range of sensitivities, 25.0%-75.0%). Factors independently associated with a sensitivity > 80% were (1) > 7 needle passes for pancreatic lesions or rapid on-site cytopathological evaluation (ROSE) (P < 0.0001), (2) a high annual hospital caseload (P = 0.024) and (3) routine isolation of microcores from EUS-FNA samples (P = 0.042). ROSE was routinely available to 27.9% of respondents. For lymph nodes and pancreatic masses, a maximum of three needle passes was performed by approximately two thirds of those who did not have ROSE. Microcores were routinely harvested from EUS-FNA samples by approximately one third (37.2%) of survey respondents., Conclusion: EUS-FNA sensitivity was considerably lower than reported in the literature. Low EUS-FNA sensitivity was associated with unavailability of ROSE, few needle passes, absence of microcore isolation and low hospital caseload.

Background: EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) is commonly performed with oblique-viewing echoendoscopes. However, accessing the PFC under an oblique angle can make drainage difficult. These difficulties might be overcome by using a forward-viewing echoendoscope., Objective: To compare endoscopic PFC drainage with an oblique-viewing versus a forward-viewing echoendoscope with emphasis on ease of endoscopic drainage., Design: Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial., Setting: Four tertiary-care referral centers., Patients: This study involved 58 patients with PFCs., Intervention: Patients with PFCs (≥ 6 cm) in whom drainage was indicated were randomized to receive EUS-guided drainage with a forward-viewing echoendoscope or an oblique-viewing echoendoscope. In cases of failed drainage, patients were crossed over to the other study arm., Main Outcome Measurements: Ease of EUS-guided drainage measured by procedure time. Secondary endpoints included technical success, EUS endoscope preference, clinical success, and adverse events., Results: Fifty-eight consecutive patients underwent randomization, of whom 52 were available for primary endpoint analysis. All 26 EUS-guided procedures done with the oblique-viewing echoendoscope and 24 of the 26 procedures done with the forward-viewing echoendoscope were technically successful. Mean (± standard deviation) procedure time was 24:55 ± 9:58 minutes in the forward-viewing echoendoscope group and 27:04 ± 9:58 minutes in the oblique-viewing echoendoscope group (P = .44). Median overall procedure ease was graded as equal (easy) in both groups. Drainage-related adverse events occurred in 2 patients (8%) in the forward-viewing echoendoscope group versus none in the oblique-viewing echoendoscope group (P = .56). Overall clinical success was achieved in 82% of patients (95% confidence interval, 69%-91%)., Limitations: Derived main outcome parameter and highly specialized endoscopists in tertiary-care referral centers., Conclusion: This multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing the performance of oblique-viewing echoendoscopes and forward-viewing echoendoscopes in draining PFCs did not show a difference in ease of EUS-guided drainage or procedure safety and efficacy between the forward-viewing echoendoscope and the oblique-viewing echoendoscope. Clinical success was achieved in 82% of patients., (Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Study Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is considered a valuable and safe technique for further investigation of pancreatic cystic lesions. In the framework of a prospective study on the accuracy of EUS-FNA we report our initial technical results regarding puncture access, sample adequacy, and complications, Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients with indeterminate pancreatic cystic lesions underwent EUS and EUS-FNA. Pancreatic cyst fluid was collected for cytopathological analysis and measurement of amylase, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (CA 19.9) levels. Main outcome parameter for this analysis was the percentage of samples adequate for cytologic and laboratory analysis., Results: Of 143 patients (median age 63 years; median cyst size 2.8 cm) who underwent EUS, FNA was performed in 128 (90 %). The various reasons for not doing FNA included large distance between transducer and cystic lesion (n = 9), cyst not seen or too small (n = 2), and evident diagnosis not requiring FNA (n = 3). FNA was not possible in four patients (technical failures). Cyst fluid sent for cytology provided adequate cellular material in 44 cases only, accounting for an intention-to-diagnose yield of 31 % (44/143). Sufficient fluid for biochemical analysis was obtained in 68 cases (49 %). Complications occurred in three patients (2.4 %)., Conclusions: Although EUS-guided FNA was technically feasible in the majority of patients with pancreatic cystic lesions (87 %), it was possible to obtain a classifying cytopathologic diagnosis and a chemical analysis in only a third and a half of cases, respectively., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background and Study Aims: Endosonography is considered a valuable technique in the evaluation of pancreatic cysts. The aim of the present study is to assess interobserver agreement, in three different observer groups, regarding EUS for characterization of pancreatic cysts., Patients and Methods: Video sequences of 40 EUS procedures for pancreatic cysts were prepared. Three groups of observers had different levels of EUS experience: group 1 comprised four experts with extensive EUS experience, group 2 had four "semi-experts" with limited EUS experience, and group 3 (novices) comprised four non-expert resident physicians without EUS experience. Features scored included septations, nodules, solid components, and pancreatic duct communication. A presumptive diagnosis had to be specified. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used, with agreement classed as excellent (> 0.80), good (0.61 - 0.80), moderate (0.41 - 0.60), fair (0.20 - 0.40), and poor (< 0.20)., Results: Agreement regarding nodules was good among experts (ICC 0.65) and fair in the semi-expert and novice groups (ICC 0.32 and 0.37, respectively). For presence of solid components there was significantly higher agreement among experts (ICC 0.52) compared with the other two groups (semi-experts 0.09, and novices 0.03). Agreement regarding specific diagnosis was moderate in the expert group (0.43), poor among the semi-experts (0.09), and fair among the novices (0.30)., Conclusions: Interobserver agreement among expert endosonographers was mostly moderate for characteristics of pancreatic cysts. However, interobserver agreement for experts was equal to or higher than that in the semi-expert and in the novice groups., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: EUS is often used for locoregional staging of early esophageal neoplasia. However, its value compared with that of endoscopic examination and diagnostic endoscopic resection (ER) may be questioned because diagnostic ER allows histological assessment of submucosal invasion and other risk factors for lymph node metastasis, eg, poor differentiation/lymphovascular invasion., Objective: To evaluate how often patients were excluded from endoscopic treatment of esophageal neoplasia based on EUS findings., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: Tertiary care institution., Patients: Patients with early esophageal neoplasia., Interventions: EUS, diagnostic ER., Main Outcome Measurements: Number of patients excluded from endoscopic treatment based on EUS results., Results: A total of 131 patients were included (98 men, 33 women; age 66 ± 13 years). In 105 of 131 patients (80%), EUS findings were unremarkable. In 25 of 105 patients (24%), diagnostic ER showed submucosal invasion (n = 17), deep resection margins positive for cancer (n = 2, confirmed at surgery), or poor differentiation/lymphovascular invasion (n = 6). In 26 of 131 patients (20%), EUS findings raised the suspicion of submucosal invasion and/or lymph node metastasis. In the 14 of 26 patients (54%) with abnormal EUS findings, endoscopy results were unremarkable. Diagnostic ER showed submucosal invasion in 7 of 14 (50%) patients, whereas no lymph node metastasis risk factors were found in 7 of 14 patients (50%), who subsequently underwent curative endoscopic treatment. In 12 of 26 patients (46%) with abnormal EUS, endoscopy also raised doubts on whether curative endoscopic treatment could be achieved. After diagnostic ER, no risk factors for lymph node metastasis were found in 3 of 12 patients (25%)., Limitation: Retrospective study., Conclusions: This study shows that EUS has virtually no clinical impact on the workup of early esophageal neoplasia and strengthens the role of diagnostic ER as a final diagnostic step., (Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the leading causes of cancer death in Western countries. An increased risk for PC is known in a number of hereditary tumor syndromes. In selected individuals at high risk of developing PC, surveillance of the pancreas might be able to detect premalignant lesions and early invasive cancers, and probably improve survival., Methods: In a Dutch family with atypical phenotypic presentation of the familial atypical multiple mole melanoma syndrome with high incidence of PC related to a mutation in the CDKN2A gene, pancreatic surveillance was offered to asymptomatic gene mutation carriers., Results: Three individuals underwent their first screening with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and magnetic resonance imaging at an age of 76, 58, and 51 years. In a mother and a daughter, mass lesions were found by EUS in the tail and body of the pancreas. The smallest lesion was not visualized on subsequent computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. After surgical resection histologic examination revealed adenocarcinomas in both cases. The patient with the larger lesion was found to have N1 disease. Side branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasias were found in the third patient., Conclusions: These findings illustrate the potential of the surveillance of high-risk individuals for PC by EUS. Awareness of clinicians of the existence of hereditary syndromes with increased risk for PC may improve identification of high-risk individuals who could benefit from surveillance. Whether screening improves survival remains to be investigated, as is the optimal interval for screening. Side branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasias in these patients may serve as a precancerous marker lesion for early intervention to improve survival.

Objectives: Approximately 10-15% of all pancreatic cancers (PCs) may be hereditary in origin. We investigated the use of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the screening of individuals at high risk for developing PC. In this paper the results of first-time screening with EUS are presented., Methods: Those eligible for screening in this study were first-degree family members of affected individuals from familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) families, mutation carriers of PC-prone hereditary syndromes, individuals with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, and mutation carriers of other PC-prone hereditary syndromes with clustering (> or =2 cases per family) of PC. All individuals were asymptomatic and had not undergone EUS before., Results: Forty-four individuals (M/F 18/26), aged 32-75 years underwent screening with EUS. Thirteen were from families with familial atypical multiple-mole melanoma (FAMMM), 21 with FPC, 3 individuals were diagnosed with hereditary pancreatitis, 2 were Peutz-Jeghers patients, 3 were BRCA1 and 2 were BRCA2 mutation carriers with familial clustering of PC, and 1 individual had a p53 mutation. Three (6.8%) patients had an asymptomatic mass lesion (12, 27, and 50 mm) in the body (n=2) or tail of the pancreas. All lesions were completely resected. Pathology showed moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas with N1 disease in the two patients with the largest lesions. EUS showed branch-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia (IPMN) in seven individuals., Conclusions: Screening of individuals at a high risk for PC with EUS is feasible and safe. The incidence of clinically relevant findings at first screening is high with asymptomatic cancer in 7% and premalignant IPMN-like lesions in 16% in our series. Whether screening improves survival remains to be determined, as does the optimal screening interval with EUS.

Background: If natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) peritoneoscopy is to become an alternative to diagnostic laparoscopy, NOTES peritoneoscopy must be comparable to laparoscopy in its diagnostic accuracy., Objective: To assess the feasibility of transgastric (TG) and transcolonic (TC) NOTES peritoneoscopy combined with intraperitoneal EUS., Design: Twelve nonsurvival experiments on 6 female pigs., Setting: Animal laboratory., Patients: Six 35- to 40-kg female pigs., Interventions: Randomization was performed to determine the order of approach (TG or TC as first procedure). After peritoneal access, systematic peritoneoscopy was performed according to a preassessed list of 12 locations considered clinically important. For each visualized location, 1 point was scored and 1 point added if it was touched as well, leading to a maximum score of 24 points. Subsequently, the endoscope was exchanged for a linear EUS-scope. The percentage of visualization of the 4 sections of the liver was recorded (0, not visible; 1, 33%; 2, 66%; 3, 100%; maximum score, 12 points). After withdrawal, the protocol was repeated by using the second natural orifice (TG or TC)., Main Outcome Measurements: Extent of adequate visualization of diagnostic peritoneoscopy and intraperitoneal EUS measured by a preassessed record form., Results: Access was achieved without difficulties at all 12 sites. TG peritoneoscopy resulted in a median of 23 points (range 20-24) via the TC approach. A maximum of 24 points was recorded in all pigs (P = .102). TG-EUS resulted in a median of 11 points (range 6-12) and TC-EUS in a median of 12 points (range 8-12) (P = .317)., Limitation: Lack of objective landmarks for EUS., Conclusions: TG and TC NOTES peritoneoscopy combined with intraperitoneal EUS is technically feasible. Furthermore, NOTES peritoneoscopy and intraperitoneal EUS seem to result in adequate visualization of the peritoneal cavity and liver, respectively.

Endosonography (EUS) has become the accepted procedure for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections in the past decade. EUS was shown to be safe and effective and it has been the first-line therapy for uncomplicated pseudocysts. Where walled-off pancreatic necrosis was originally thought to be a contraindication for endoscopic treatment, multiple case series have now shown that these fluid collections also can be treated endoscopically with low morbidity and mortality. Analogous to the treatment of pancreatic fluid collections, others, such as abscesses in the lower and upper abdomen, have also been treated successfully, although there is limited literature in this regard, EUS appears to be a useful technique in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures as well.

Background and Study Aims: To assess the prognostic importance of standardized uptake value (SUV) for 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) at positron emission tomography (PET) and of EUS parameters, in esophageal cancer patients primarily treated by surgery., Patients and Methods: Between October 2002 and August 2004 a prospective cohort study involved 125 patients, with histologically proven cancer of the esophagus, without evidence of distant metastases or locally irresectable disease based on extensive preoperative work-up, and fit to undergo major surgery. Follow-up was complete until October 2006, ensuring a minimal potential follow-up of 25 months., Results: The median SUV was 0.27 (interquartile range 0.13 - 0.45), and was used as cutoff value between high (n = 62) and low (n = 63) SUV. Patients with a high SUV had a significantly worse disease-specific survival compared with patients with a low SUV (P = 0.04). Tumor location (P = 0.005), EUS T stage (P < 0.001), EUS N stage (P = 0.006) and clinical stage (P < 0.006) were also associated with disease-specific survival. However, in multivariate analysis only EUS T stage appeared to be of independent prognostic significance (P = 0.007)., Conclusion: In esophageal cancer patients, EUS T stage, EUS N stage, location and SUV of the primary tumor are pretreatment factors that are associated with disease-specific survival. However, only EUS T stage is an independent prognostic factor.

Background: Transmural endoscopic drainage has become the treatment of first choice for uncomplicated pseudocysts. Drainage is mostly performed with presently available therapeutic oblique-viewing (45 degrees ) US endoscopes. Puncturing at an angle sometimes hampers successful completion of the procedure, because the force that is applied while introducing instruments through the working channel is not fully exerted at the tip of the accessory but instead drives the endoscope away from the gut wall. A prototype forward-viewing US endoscope was developed to overcome this difficulty., Objective: Evaluation of an initial experience with a novel prototype forward-viewing US endoscope in endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts., Design: Retrospective, observational study., Setting: Two tertiary-referral centers., Patients: Seven patients were treated., Interventions: Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst with a novel forward-viewing US endoscope., Main Outcome Measurements: Successful endoscopic drainage., Observations: In all cases drainage was successfully performed without complications. In 2 cases, the procedure was initially started with a conventional side-viewing EUS scope, but it proved impossible to puncture the pseudocyst. However, with the use of the forward-viewing EUS scope, both pseudocysts were successfully punctured., Limitations: Small sample size., Conclusions: Initial clinical experience with this novel prototype forward-view US endoscope for transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst is favorable. It provides better control during puncturing of the cyst wall and creates a possibility to drain collections that are inaccessible with a conventional therapeutic side-viewing US endoscope.

Purpose: To compare diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasonography (US), and fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with esophageal cancer by using a systematic review of the literature., Materials and Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for relevant studies. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of each study. Summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to summarize and compare the diagnostic accuracy of the three modalities., Results: Four studies with CT, 13 with endoscopic US, and seven with FDG PET met inclusion criteria. Percentages of the maximum score in regard to methodological quality ranged from 15% to 100%. Summary ROC analysis could be performed for three studies with CT, four with endoscopic US, and four with FDG PET. The maximum joint values for sensitivity and specificity were 54% for CT, 86% for endoscopic US, and 85% for FDG PET. Accuracy of CT was significantly lower than that of FDG PET (P < .006) and of endoscopic US (P < .003). Accuracy of FDG PET and that of endoscopic US were similar (P = .839). In all patients, CT was always feasible, whereas endoscopic US was not feasible in 6% of the patients, and FDG PET was not feasible in less than 1%., Conclusion: CT has poor accuracy for assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with esophageal cancer. Endoscopic US and FDG PET have equivalent good accuracy, but endoscopic US is not always feasible after chemotherapy and radiation therapy. FDG PET seems to be a promising noninvasive tool for assessment of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with esophageal cancer.

Background and Study Aims: The management of patients with esophageal cancer with malignant celiac lymph nodes (CLNs) is controversial. In this study we evaluated the management and survival of patients with positive CLN findings on endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and compared the outcome in surgically treated patients with that of nonsurgically treated patients., Patients and Methods: The EUS database of the Academic Medical Center was retrospectively searched for patients with esophageal carcinoma and EUS-positive CLN. Follow-up comprised the review of medical charts and contact with general practitioners., Results: From 1993 through 2000, 78 patients with esophageal carcinoma and suspicious CLN were eligible for inclusion in this study. The median survival of patients with CLN size < 2 cm was 13.5 months vs. 7.0 months for patients with CLN size >2 cm ( P = 0.01). In a multivariate model, CLN size was the only predictive factor for poor patient survival. Of the 78 study patients, 13 underwent a surgical resection and 65 received nonsurgical treatment. The surgical group was significantly younger and all patients in this group had CLN size < 2 cm. The median survival for the surgical group was 13.7 months vs. 13.5 months for the nonsurgical group with CLN size < 2 cm ( P = 0.63)., Conclusions: In this retrospective study, CLN size was a significant predictor for poor survival. The surgically treated patients had a medium-term survival similar to that of nonsurgically treated patients with a CLN size < 2 cm. These findings underline the prognostic value of CLN size in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Background: Patients undergoing EUS usually receive intravenously administered sedative medication. A double-blind, prospective, randomized trial was conducted to compare midazolam with a placebo for EUS of the esophagus and stomach and to assess patient tolerance and endoscopic feasibility., Methods: A total of 111 patients were randomized to receive midazolam or a placebo. Patients used a visual analogue scale to score pre-EUS anxiety and tolerance for the procedure. Endoscopists used a visual analogue scale to score ease of echoendoscope introduction and overall patient cooperation. Subsequent to EUS, patients were asked if they were willing to undergo the procedure under the same conditions., Results: The patients' visual analogue scale scores indicated that tolerance for the introduction of the echoendoscope and the procedure overall were both significantly better in the midazolam group. Overall patient tolerance was predicted by sedation (p < 0.001) and pre-EUS anxiety (p = 0.024). Endoscopists' visual analogue scale scores showed that ease of echoendoscope introduction was significantly better in the midazolam group. There was no significant difference in overall patient cooperation during the procedure. There were no significant differences in introduction time, total procedure time, or patients' willingness to undergo the procedure under the same conditions., Conclusions: EUS of the esophagus and stomach without intravenous sedation is feasible for endoscopists and patients. Patients prefer intravenous administration of midazolam. Assessment of anxiety before EUS may indicate whether administration of midazolam can improve tolerance for the individual patient.

Background: The arteria lusoria is an aberrant right subclavian artery that passes dorsally between the esophagus and spine after branching off from the aortic arch. The role of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in the diagnosis of the arteria lusoria has not been established. The possibility of demonstrating this vascular anomaly with EUS and estimating its prevalence was assessed., Methods: From December 1991 to September 1998, EUS of the upper gastrointestinal tract was performed in 3334 consecutive patients for various reasons. After imaging of the target organ(s), the echoendoscope was slowly pulled back while imaging the mediastinum proximally to the superior aspect of the aortic arch. In every patient, the area of the aortic arch was carefully inspected and special attention was given to vessels crossing from left to right between the esophagus and spine., Results: During the study period, an arteria lusoria was discovered in 12 of 3334 patients (0.36%: 95% CI [0.16%, 0.56%]). There were 6 men and 6 women; mean age was 64+/-14.7 years. In all 12 patients the arteria lusoria passed between the esophagus and spine. In none of the patients could symptoms be attributed to the presence of this anatomic variant., Conclusions: An arteria lusoria can be detected with upper gastrointestinal EUS and was found in 0.36% of patients. EUS can accurately demonstrate this vascular anomaly.

For patients with gastro-esophageal cancer ultrasonography (EUS) is superior to any other imaging modality in the assessment of local tumor infiltration and local lymph nodes status. EUS is especially important in the preoperative staging of patients with esophageal cancer and patients with proximal gastric cancer. Here it allows for the identification of those patients with advanced disease who are unlikely to benefit from surgery and in whom a conservative palliative treatment is indicated. In advanced gastric cancer the clinical implications of EUS less clear. Still preoperative EUS is indicated in every patient with cancer of the proximal stomach to assess tumor infiltration in the esophagus. Relatively new is the use of EUS in staging early cancers in order to select patients for local endoscopic treatment. High-frequency miniprobes are the instruments of choice for imaging these lesions. Strict criteria should be applied in the selection of patients for local endoscopic treatment of early gastro-esophageal cancers. EUS guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is currently only indicated in patients with esophageal cancer and suspicious celiac lymph nodes. It may become more important if new treatment protocols demand more objective and reliable assessment of lymph node status.

Background: Endosonography is an accurate preoperative staging technique for esophageal carcinoma. We retrospectively investigated a cohort of patients with carcinoma of the esophagus or gastric cardia that was endosonographically staged to be irresectable and studied whether their survival was influenced by the treatment received., Study Design: Between April 1992 and July 1995, 654 patients were referred for endosonographic staging. We retrospectively searched our database for patients staged T4 and collected followup. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards model were used to study the effect of treatment and various other factors on survival., Results: Fifty-one patients (median age, 62 years; range, 44-87; 37 male) were staged T4 by endosonography. Followup was collected of all patients. Explorative surgery was chosen in 24 patients (47%), and the tumor was resected in 13 patients. Median survival in the surgical group was 9.67 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.03, 13.31) and 7.06 months (95% CI: 5.68, 8.44) in the nonsurgical group (not significant). Patients with infiltration in the respiratory tract had a 2.5 times higher risk of death than patients without (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.54; 95% CI: 1.30, 4.96)., Conclusions: Patients staged irresectable by endosonography (T4 stage) have a very poor prognosis, regardless of further therapy. Survival of this group of patients was not influenced by surgery.

Background: Half of the patients who undergo surgery for cancer of the esophagus or gastric cardia present with recurrent disease within 2 years after the operation. We investigated the value of endosonography for the early detection of recurrent disease., Methods: Forty-three patients entered a follow-up protocol in which endosonography was performed every 6 months within the first 2 years after resection., Results: During 16 of a total of 66 examinations, suspicious abnormalities were found. In three patients free fluid was seen, but recurrence could not be confirmed during follow-up. In eight patients suspicious lymph nodes were seen; six died within 6 months, one was alive with a proven recurrence at 6 months, and one was alive without recurrence at 22 months. In five patients focal wall-thickening or a mass was seen; three died within 6 months, and two were alive with a proven recurrence at 2 and 5 months. After exclusion of free fluid, the positive predictive value of abnormalities on endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) was 92%., Conclusions: Endosonography, performed at 6-month intervals after resection of cancer of the esophagus or gastric cardia, is accurate in the early detection of locoregional recurrent disease. Two thirds of the patients were still without symptoms when the recurrence was found.

Background: To investigate whether endosonography can help in the detection and treatment of Dieulafoy's disease, we examined eight patients with suspicion of Dieulafoy's disease., Methods: Between December 1992 and April 1995, eight patients were referred because of suspicion of Dieulafoy's disease. Seven presented with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and one with a tiny ulcer. In all eight patients the stomach was examined with an Olympus GF-UM20 echoendoscope. The stomach was filled with 200 to 400 ml of water after which the body, fundus, and cardia were carefully visualized., Results: In all eight patients a clearly visible, relatively large caliber (2 to 3 mm) vessel was seen to penetrate the muscularis propria and could be followed running through the submucosa for 2 to 4 cm. Subsequently four patients received sclerotherapy, three under endosonographic guidance. Follow-up of all patients (median 10 months), showed recurrent bleeding in two patients, 3 and 5 months after sclerotherapy. One was then diagnosed with a duodenal ulcer and one with recurrent bleeding from the Dieulafoy's lesion., Conclusions: Endosonography is useful in the detection of Dieulafoy's disease in patients with unexplained upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Sclerotherapy can be performed during the same procedure, with endosonography-guided injection of the sclerosing agent near the abnormal vessel.

Background: It has been suggested that 50 endosonographic examination are necessary to attain sufficient skill to become accurate in the staging of esophageal carcinoma., Methods: Since July 1991 all esophageal endosonographies have been performed by one investigator. The database, containing all examinations since July 1991, was reviewed to investigate the presence of a learning curve in T-staging of esophageal carcinoma by comparing the endosonographic T-stage with the pathologic T-stage., Results: From July 1991 until April 1993, 231 endosonographies were performed for esophageal malignancies. Eighty-nine patients had been referred for preoperative staging and underwent surgical exploration. Seventy-one tumors were resected. The patients were split in two groups. Group I consisted of 36 patients examined between July 1991 and April 1992. In this period 100 endosonographies were performed. Group II consisted of 35 patients examined between April 1992 and March 1993. In this period 131 endosonographies were performed. Overall endosonographic T-staging was correct in 70%. The accuracy in group I was 58%; In group II 83% (p < 0.05). Overstaging was equally common in groups I and II (14%). Understaging was common in group I (28%), but rare in group II (3%)., Conclusion: This study shows a definite learning curve for endosonographic T-staging of esophageal carcinoma. Acceptable accuracy rates could only be achieved after 100 examinations.

Endosonography (ES) or endoscopic ultrasonography has undergone very rapid development and has now become an important imaging technique for gastroenterologists all over the world. Endosonography is currently used in a wide field of gastrointestinal diseases, most of which are in the upper gastrointestinal tract. This small tour will take you through the forest of indications in endosonography, focusing on staging of malignancies. The tour will stop at the most common indications for ES, briefly summarizing the current state of affairs and taking a short look into the future.

BACKGROUND: Detection of hepatic metastases during EUS is an important component of tumor staging. OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience with EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) of solid hepatic masses and derive and validate criteria to help distinguish between benign and malignant hepatic masses. DESIGN: Retrospective study, survey. SETTING: Single, tertiary-care referral center. PATIENTS: Medical records were reviewed for all patients undergoing EUS-FNA of solid hepatic masses over a 12-year period. INTERVENTIONS: EUS-FNA of solid hepatic masses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Masses were deemed benign or malignant according to predetermined criteria. EUS images from 200 patients were used to create derivation and validation cohorts of 100 cases each, matched by cytopathologic diagnosis. Ten expert endosonographers blindly rated 15 initial endosonographic features of each of the 100 images in the derivation cohort. These data were used to derive an EUS scoring system that was then validated by using the validation cohort by the expert endosonographer with the highest diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: A total of 332 patients underwent EUS-FNA of a hepatic mass. Interobserver agreement regarding the initial endosonographic features among the expert endosonographers was fair to moderate, with a mean diagnostic accuracy of 73% (standard deviation 5.6). A scoring system incorporating 7 EUS features was developed to distinguish benign from malignant hepatic masses by using the derivation cohort with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.92; when applied to the validation cohort, performance was similar (AUC 0.86). The combined positive predictive value of both cohorts was 88%. LIMITATIONS: Single center, retrospective, only one expert endosonographer deriving and validating the EUS criteria. CONCLUSION: An EUS scoring system was developed that helps distinguish benign from malignant hepatic masses. Further study is required to determine the impact of these EUS criteria among endosonographers of all experience.