Search

Background: With endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS), guidewire manipulation might be a critically limiting step for nonexperts. However, the causes of difficult guidewire manipulation remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate factors associated with successful guidewire manipulation., Methods: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent EUS-HGS between October 2018 and October 2019. We measured scope angle between the long and needle axes of the echoendoscope using still fluoroscopic imaging immediately after puncturing the intrahepatic bile duct. Factors associated with successful guidewire insertion were assessed by multivariable analysis using logistic regression., Result: The influence of the angle between the fine-needle aspiration (FNA) needle and echoendoscope on failed guidewire insertion was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Area under the ROC curve was 0.86 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.00 - 0.76), and an angle of 135° offered 88.0 % sensitivity and 82.9 % specificity for predicting successful guidewire insertion. According to multivariable analysis, only angle between the FNA needle and echoendoscope > 135° was independently associated with successful guidewire insertion (odd ratio 0.03, 95 %CI 0.01 - 0.14; P  < 0.05), whereas sex, puncture site, and diameter of puncture site were not significant factors. After multivariable analysis, all variables were adjusted using age ≥ 70 or < 70 years, yielding the same results., Conclusion: The angle between the FNA needle and echoendoscope might be associated with successful guidewire manipulation during EUS-HGS. Adjusting this angle to 135° before puncturing the intrahepatic bile duct might be helpful in achieving successful guidewire manipulation during EUS-HGS., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) is a common technique for biliary drainage. However, EUS-CDS is associated with adverse events such as cystic duct obstruction, stent dislocation, and stent kinking caused by powerful axial force. A novel double-bare, covered self-expandable metal stent (DBSEMS) has recently become available in Japan. This pilot study evaluated the clinical outcomes of EUS-CDS using DBSEMS., Method: We retrospectively enrolled patients with malignant lower bile duct obstruction who underwent EUS-CDS due to failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). EUS-CDS procedures performed between April 2017 and March 2018 used a conventional fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS), and those performed between April 2018 and April 2019 used DBSEMS. In all stents, the diameter was 10 mm and length was 6 cm., Results: A total of 22 patients underwent EUS-CDS, performed using conventional FCSEMS (n = 12) and DBSEMS (n = 10). Four complications occurred with FCSEMS: cholangitis due to kinking (n = 3) and stent dislocation (n = 1). With DBSEMS, there were no instances of kinking, and reflux cholangitis that developed in 1 patient due to duodenal obstruction was resolved by duodenal stenting. Elapsed time to recurrent biliary obstruction was longer with DBSEMS than FCSEMS (200 vs. 99 days), although the difference was not significant (p = 0.06)., Conclusion: BSEMS can help prevent cholangitis due to stent kinking after EUS-CDS, thus increasing stent patency., (© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Recently, lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have been developed as novel devices for not only endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided pancreatic fluid drainage but also for EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (GBD). Although LAMS might be clinically impactful, these stents have not yet become available as EUS-GBD stents in all countries, including Japan. Instead, improved metal stents (NEO stents) have become available. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of EUS-GBD using the improved metal stent with an anti-stent migration system for acute cholecystitis (AC)., Method: The gallbladder was punctured using a 19-G needle, and a 0.025-inch guidewire was inserted into the gallbladder. After fistula dilation, stent deployment was performed from the gallbladder to the duodenum. Finally, a plastic 7-Fr pigtail stent was placed to prevent stent migration., Result: EUS-GBD using NEO stents with the anti-stent migration system was attempted in 12 consecutive patients with AC as a complication of other conditions. EUS-GBD was successfully performed in all patients without any adverse events, and clinical success was achieved in all patients. Median procedure time was 19.0 min (range, 19-24 min). In 4 patients, stent removal was successfully performed after 3 months. Stent migration during follow-up (median, 189 days) was not seen in any of the patients., Conclusion: Although this study has several limitations such as small number of patients and short follow-up period, the results show that NEO stents might be suitable as EUS-GBD stents in selected patients. Our results should be validated by a larger prospective, randomized study., (© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Background and Aims: No data appear to have been reported regarding bleeding risk among patients receiving antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant treatment (AP/AC) during EUS-guided biliary drainage (BD) procedures. The aim of this study was to assess whether hemorrhagic adverse events associated with EUS-BD are increased in patients on AP/AC., Methods: Patients receiving AP/AC who underwent EUS-BD were retrospectively enrolled between May 2015 and August 2019. Patients who did not receive AP/AC and underwent EUS-BD in the same period were also enrolled as a control group., Results: One hundred ninety-five patients who underwent EUS-BD were enrolled in this study. Among these, 154 patients were allocated to the control group and 41 patients to the AP/AC group. Overall frequency of adverse events did not differ significantly between the control group (16.2%, 25/154) and AC/AP group (17.1%, 6/41; P = .80). The overall bleeding event rate was 3.6% (7/195), with no significant difference between the 2 groups. No thromboembolic events were observed with or without interruption of AP/AC. According to logistic regression analysis, the use of AP/AC was not a risk factor significantly associated with bleeding events (odds ratio, 2.96; 95% confidence interval, .56-14.0; P = .18). On the other hand, a long procedure time (>20 minutes) was an independent risk factor associated with bleeding events., Conclusions: Bleeding events appear to be infrequent among patients who undergo EUS-BD while continuing AP/AC., (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: None