Search

Background: The insertion of inappropriately sized uncuffed endotracheal tubes (ETTs) with a tight seal or presence of air leakage may be necessary in children. This study aimed to analyze the frequency of the requirement of inappropriately sized uncuffed ETT insertion, air leakage after the ETT was replaced with one of a larger size, and factors associated with air leakage after ETT replacement. Methods: Patients under 2 years of age who underwent oral surgery under general anesthesia with uncuffed ETTs between December 2013 and May 2015 were enrolled. The ETT size was selected at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologists. A leak test was performed after intubation. The ETT was replaced when considered necessary. Data regarding the leak pressure (PLeak) and inspiratory and expiratory tidal volumes were extracted from anesthesia records. We considered a PLeak of 10 < PLeak ≤ 30 cmH2O to be appropriate. The frequencies of the requirement of inappropriately sized ETTs, absence of leakage after ETT replacement, ETT size difference, and leak rate were calculated. A logistic regression was performed, with PLeak, leak rate, and size difference included as explanatory variables and presence of leakage after replacement as the outcome variable. Results: Out of the 156 patients enrolled, 109 underwent ETT replacement, with the requirement of inappropriately sized ETTs being observed in 25 patients (23%). ETT replacement was performed in patients with PLeak ≤ 10 cmH2O; leakage was absent after replacement (PLeak < 30 cmH2O) in 52% of patients (25/48). In the multivariate logistic model, the leak rate before ETT replacement was significantly associated with the presence of leakage after replacement (p = 0.021). Conclusions: Inappropriately sized ETTs were inserted in approximately 23% of the patients. The leak rate may be useful to guide ETT replacement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Objective: To determine which nostril is more suitable for nasotracheal intubation in patients with normal patency of both nostrils. Design: Prospective, randomized clinical trial. Setting: Operating room of a university medical center. Patients: 191 ASA physical status 1 and 2 patients scheduled for elective oral surgery requiring general anesthesia with nasotracheal intubation. Interventions: Patients were randomized to two groups to undergo nasotracheal intubation through the right nostril (Group R; n = 96) or the left nostril (n = 95). Standard traditional nasotracheal intubation was performed using the Macintosh laryngoscope. Tube rotation was attempted for alignment toward the glottis, and Magill forceps were then used to assist intubation, as necessary. Measurements: Epistaxis was inspected in the pharynx after the tube tip was passed through the nasal cavity and 15 minutes after nasotracheal intubation was completed. Intubation time was the interval between when the anesthesiologist opened the patient's mouth with the cross finger maneuver and when the tube was connected to the anesthetic circuit after nasotracheal completion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In patients in whom a tracheal tube cannot be inserted through the nostrils due to multiple facial trauma or hypoplasty of the nose, submental orotracheal intubation (SOI) is performed to avoid tracheostomy. We report a new modification for SOI to minimize the risk of apnea. A 20-year-old man was scheduled for sagittal split ramus osteotomy. As the patient had severe hypoplasia of the nose, SOI was planned. Following orotracheal intubation with a spiral tube (first tube), a submental tunnel was surgically created. A second tube that had been confirmed, in advance, to snugly fit into the proximal end of the first tube was passed into the submental tunnel via a polypropylene cylinder and connected between the first tube and the breathing circuit. After careful withdrawal of the second tube through the submental tunnel, the first tube was directly connected to the breathing circuit after removal of the second tube. Although this technique requires additional time, apnea time is minimal even in patients in whom withdrawal of the tracheal tube through the submental tunnel takes time, because the second tube forms a link between the first tube and the breathing circuit, making it possible to ventilate the patient throughout the procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aims to validate our previously reported prediction technique for uncuffed tracheal tube (TT) sizes in children younger than 2 years of age based on a calculated outer diameter (ODCal, mm) in each patient according to the regression equation ODCal = 0.00223 × age (day) + 4.88 and to investigate a better method to select initial TT sizes to decrease re-intubation frequency, especially since large tubes can damage the trachea. Methods: We included patients younger than 2 years of age who underwent oral surgery under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation between July 2011 and December 2016 at the Osaka University Dental Hospital. The OD of the actual TT and the age in days were extracted from anesthesia records. Agreement rates, estimated numbers of required tubes, and size reduction frequencies were compared to obtain recommended OD (ODRec) values in 2 selection groups: "average selection" in the range "nearest to the ODCal value (ODCal - 0.35 < ODRec ≤ ODCal + 0.35)" and "safe selection" in the range "nearest to the value below ODCal (ODCal - 0.7 < ODRec ≤ ODCal)". Results: The agreement rates for an ODRec in the average selection and safe selection groups were 60.8 and 55.1%, respectively (P = 0.001). The estimated number of required tubes per patient were 1.40 ± 0.51 and 1.47 ± 0.55 (P < 0.001), respectively. The estimated frequencies of size reductions were 13.3 and 4.0% (P < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: Because the size reduction frequency is lower despite a slightly higher number of required TTs, selecting an ODRec based on "safe selection" parameters is desirable to avoid complications due to intubation with larger TTs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]