Search

Background: An increased prevalence of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) has been demonstrated in patients with simple renal cysts (SRC); patients with SRC have a less elastic aortic wall than those without SRC. The purpose of this study was to evaluate aneurysm sac shrinkage after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for true TAA in patients with and without SRC., Methods: One hundred three patients with true aneurysms of the thoracic aorta who underwent TEVAR at our university hospital from November 2013 to December 2021 were included in this study. Aneurysm sac size was compared between that on baseline preoperative computed tomography and that on postoperative computed tomography scans at 1 year. A change in aneurysm sac size ≥5 mm was considered to be significant, whether due to expansion or shrinkage., Results: The patients were divided into two groups: those with SRC (46 patients [45%]) and those without SRC (57 patients [55%]). At 1 year, there was a significant difference in the proportion of aneurysm sac shrinkage between patients with SRC and those without SRC (23.9% vs 59.6%; P < .001). Patients with SRC showed significantly less aneurysm sac shrinkage than those without SRC (-1.8 ± 5.6 mm vs -5.1 ± 6.6 mm; P = .009). Univariable and multivariable analyses showed that the initial sac diameter (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.14; P = .002) and the presence of SRC (odds ratio, 0.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.40; P < .001) were positively and negatively associated with aneurysm sac shrinkage after TEVAR, respectively., Conclusions: The presence of a SRC was independently associated with failure of aneurysm sac shrinkage after TEVAR for true TAA. This suggests that the presence of a SRC may be a predictor for the failure of aneurysm sac shrinkage after TEVAR., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) results in a marked reduction of intrasac pressure, which is the likely cause of aneurysm sac shrinkage. We evaluated the change of intrasac pressure during operation and its association with aneurysm sac shrinkage one year after EVAR., Methods: This study included 113 patients undergoing EVAR using the Gore C3 Excluder at our university hospital between March 2016 and December 2020. A direct intrasac pressure was measured before and after stent deployment. The Pressure Index (PI) was defined as the ratio of intrasac pressure to systemic blood pressure., Results: Patients were divided into two groups: patients with aneurysm sac shrinkage (N.=33, 29%) and those without (N.=80, 71%). Systolic and diastolic PI after stent graft deployment were significantly higher in patients with aneurysm sac shrinkage than those without, respectively (systolic PI, 64.6±13.9% vs. 58.1±12.0%, P=0.014; diastolic PI, 103.8±24.7% vs. 96.4±12.9%, P=0.039). Multivariable analysis revealed post-deployment systolic PI as an independent risk factor predictive of aneurysm sac shrinkage (odds ratio 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.08; P=0.016)., Conclusions: Although systolic intrasac pressure, described as systolic PI, was an independent risk factor for aneurysm sac shrinkage, contrary to our expectation, it was significantly higher in patients with aneurysm sac shrinkage than those without. This seemingly contradictory result may be explained by the properties of an aneurysm sac, which influence the change of intrasac pressure.

Introduction: Component separation (CS) of the Zenith Dissection Endovascular Graft and Stent have been reported with some causes. However, CS caused by aortic elongation has not yet been reported. A long treatment range with the sacrifice of some intercostal arteries (ICAs) is sometimes needed when repairing CS because of the large difference in the diameter between the proximal and distal landing zones with a reverse taper., Case Presentation: A 78-year-old man, who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) using a Zenith Dissection Graft and stents for acute type B aortic dissection 3 years and 8 months previously was admitted to our hospital with severe back pain. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed separation of the SG and bare stent, and aortic elongation. As there was a large difference in the diameter of the proximal and distal landing zones with a reverse taper, a long treatment range with the sacrifice of two large ICAs was needed. Thus, TEVAR using an inverted thoracic SG technique was performed in order to shorten the treatment range to preserve a large ICA and reduce the risk of paraplegia. Completion angiography showed that the separation was repaired with preservation of the large ICA. The postoperative course was uneventful, and he was discharged on postoperative day 10 with relief of his severe pain. At 1 year after secondary TEVAR, CT showed that the diameter of the descending aorta had decreased with no separation of the SGs., Conclusion: Deployment of an inverted thoracic SG for the treatment of CS of the Zenith Dissection Endovascular Graft and Stent is a feasible and effective procedure to preserve ICAs. An overlapping range of >1.5 times the length of a bare stent within an SG is needed to prevent CS of the Zenith Dissection Endovascular Graft and Stent caused by aortic elongation.