Search

The Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal disease Researchers (CEGIR) and The International Gastrointestinal Eosinophil Researchers (TIGERs) organized a daylong symposium at the 2024 annual meeting of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The symposium featured new discoveries in basic and translational research as well as debates on the mechanisms and management of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases. Updates on recent clinical trials and consensus guidelines were also presented. We summarize the updates on eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases presented at the symposium., Competing Interests: Disclosure statement Supported by U54AI117804 (Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers), which is part of the Rare Disease Clinical Research Network (RDCRN), an initiative of the Office of Rare Disease Research (ORDR), National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), and is funded through collaboration between National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), NCATS, and in part by the Division of Intramural Research, NIAID/NIH. CEGIR is also supported by patient advocacy groups including American Partnership for Eosinophilic Disorders (APFED), Campaign Urging Research for Eosinophilic Diseases (CURED), and Eosinophilic Family Coalition (EFC). As a member of the RDCRN, CEGIR is also supported by its Data Management and Coordinating Center (DMCC) (U2CTR002818). Funding support for the DMCC is provided by the NCATS and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). B.L.W. was funded by NIH/NIAID (K23AI158813). E.M.A. was funded by the NIH (KL2TR002552, K12TR004410). S.S.A. was funded by NIH/NIDDK (R56AI092135). S.J.A. was funded by NIH/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (R01HL153170). D.A.H. was directly supported by the Hartwell Foundation, the Food Allergy Fund, and a faculty development award from the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Allergy research in the Hill laboratory was supported by NIH/NHLBI (R01HL162715) and the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute. J.W.C. was supported by the NIH (K23DK129784). F.L.K. was funded by APFED HOPE Pilot Grant 2023 and NIH/NIAID K23AI171085. M.A.R. was funded by the NIH (K08AI148456). L.A.S. was supported by NIH/NIAID (R01AI168134). The contents are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views or an endorsement by the NIH or other funders. None of the funding sources had a role in the design or conduct of the study. Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: B. L. Wright reports in-kind support from Regeneron in the form of study drug (dupilumab and placebo) for a clinical trial of milk oral immunotherapy. J. P. Abonia reports receipt of payment or honoraria for lectures from Takeda Global Research and Development; participation on a data safety monitoring board for OctaPharma USA; and receipt of grants or contracts from Cures Within Reach and Celgene. E. M. Abud is coinventor of patent WO/2018/160496 (microglia differentiation and use); serves as advisory board member and consulting agreements with StemPharm and Neucyte; and reports advisory board participation for Amgen and AstraZeneca. S. S. Aceves is coinventor of oral viscous budesonide, patented by the University of California, San Diego, and licensed by Takeda (oral budesonide suspension); has acted as speaker for Regeneron/Sanofi; and has received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb. S. J. Ackerman is chief science officer and executive board member of EnteroTrack; has received patents on the Esophageal String Test (EST); has consulted for Areteia Pharmaceuticals; and has participated on the medical advisory panel of the American Partnership for Eosinophilic Disorders (APFED). M. Braskett reports acting as scientific advisor to Bryn Pharma; and receipt of royalties from UpToDate. J. W. Chang reports consulting for Regeneron/Sanofi, Takeda, and Bristol Myers Squibb. M. Chehade reports consulting for Regeneron/Sanofi, Adare/Ellodi, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Allakos, Shire/Takeda, Phathom, and Recludix Pharma; and receipt of research funding from Regeneron, Allakos, AstraZeneca, Adare/Ellodi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Danone, and Shire/Takeda. G. M. Constantine reports speaker honoraria from PeerView CME. C. M. Davis reports research funding from NIH/NIAID, DBV, Regeneron, AstraZeneca, Takeda, and Allergenis; and educational funding from Genentech. E. S. Dellon reports research funding from Adare/Ellodi, Allakos, Arena/Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Eupraxia, Ferring, GSK, Meritage, Miraca, Nutricia, Celgene/Receptos/BMS, Regeneron, Revolo, and Shire/Takeda; consulting for Abbott, AbbVie, Adare/Ellodi, Aimmune, Akesobio, Alfasigma, ALK, Allakos, Amgen, Apollo, Aqilion, Arena/Pfizer, Aslan, AstraZeneca, Avir, Biorasi, Bryn, Calypso, Celgene/Receptos/BMS, Celldex, Eli Lilly, EsoCap, Eupraxia, Dr Falk Pharma, Ferring, GSK, Gossamer Bio, Holoclara, Invea, Knightpoint, Landos, LucidDx, Morphic, Nexstone Immunology/Uniquity, Nutricia, Parexel/Calyx, Phathom, Regeneron, Revolo, Robarts/Alimentiv, Salix, Sanofi, Shire/Takeda, Target RWE, and Upstream Bio; and receipt of educational grants from Allakos, Aqilion, Holoclara, and Invea. R. Durban reports consulting for Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Reckitt/Mead Johnson Nutrition, Abbott Nutrition, and Nutricia North America. D. A. Hill has received a patent related to the utilization of food-specific T-cell responses for the diagnosis and management of EoE. E. T. Jensen reports consulting fees from Regeneron, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and TARGET-RWE. A. Kewalramani reports sitting on the Sanofi Mid-Atlantic Regional Respiratory Field medical advisory board. P. Khoury and A. D. Klion report royalties from UpToDate. F. L. Kuang reports research funding from AstraZeneca. E. C. McGowan reports funding from NIH/NIAID and American College of Gastroenterology; and consulting for Regeneron/Sanofi and Takeda. J. M. Spergel reports grant support from the NIH, Regeneron/Sanofi, and Novartis; and has consulted for Regeneron/Sanofi, Allakos, Readysetfood, Novartis, and Bristol Myers Squibb. A. M. Uchida reports consulting for Regeneron/Sanofi, Takeda, and AstraZeneca. J. B. Wechslerc reports consulting for Allakos, Ellodi, Regeneron/Sanofi/Genzyme, Bristol Myers Squibb, Invea Therapeutics, CellDex, and AstraZeneca; and clinical trial/research funding from Allakos and Regeneron/Sanofi. R. D. Pesek reports consulting for Regeneron. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. All rights reserved.)

Although eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases, including eosinophilic esophagitis, have been described over the past 2 to 3 decades, barriers to diagnosis and treatment are common and compounded by issues related to social determinants of health, race, ethnicity, and access to care. These barriers contribute to delays in diagnosis, resulting in persistent inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract, which can have significant consequences, including fibrostenotic complications in adults, failure to thrive in children, and decreased quality of life in all affected patients. In this commentary, we summarize gaps in knowledge regarding the epidemiology of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases, highlight barriers to diagnosis, discuss potential approaches based on best practices in other atopic and chronic gastrointestinal diseases, and provide recommendations for reducing barriers to timely diagnosis of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases in underserved populations., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, inflammatory, antigen-driven disease of the esophagus. Tissue EoE pathology has previously been extensively characterized by novel transcriptomics and proteomic platforms, however the majority of surface marker determination and screening has been performed in blood due to mucosal tissue size limitations. While eosinophils, CD4 + T cells, mast cells and natural killer (NK) T cells were previously investigated in the context of EoE, an accurate picture of the composition of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and their activation is missing., Methods: In this study, we aimed to comprehensively analyze the composition of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and their activation using surface marker measurements with multicolor flow cytometry simultaneously in both blood and mucosal tissue of patients with active EoE, inactive EoE, patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and controls. Moreover, we set out to validate our data in co-cultures of PBMC with human primary esophageal epithelial cells and in a novel inducible mouse model of eosinophilic esophagitis, characterized by extensive IL-33 secretion in the esophagus., Results: Our results indicate that specific PBMC populations are enriched, and that they alter their surface expression of activation markers in mucosal tissue of active EoE. In particular, we observed upregulation of the immunomodulatory molecule CD38 on CD4 + T cells and on myeloid cells in biopsies of active EoE. Moreover, we observed significant upregulation of PD-1 on CD4 + and myeloid cells, which was even more prominent after corticosteroid treatment. With co-culture experiments we could demonstrate that direct cell contact is needed for PD-1 upregulation on CD4 + T cells. Finally, we validated our findings of PD-1 and CD38 upregulation in an inducible mouse model of EoE., Discussion: Herein we show significant alterations in the PBMC activation profile of patients with active EoE in comparison to inactive EoE, GERD and controls, which could have potential implications for treatment. To our knowledge, this study is the first of its kind expanding the multi-color flow cytometry approach in different patient groups using in vitro and in vivo translational models., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Gruden, Kienzl, Ristic, Kindler, Kaspret, Schmid, Kargl, Sturm, Doyle, Wright, Baumann-Durchschein, Konrad, Blesl, Schlager and Schicho.)

The Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases and The International Gastrointestinal Eosinophil Researchers organized a day-long symposium at the 2022 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The symposium featured a review of recent discoveries in the basic biology and pathogenesis of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) in addition to advances in our understanding of the clinical features of EGIDs. Diagnostic and management approaches were reviewed and debated, and clinical trials of emerging therapies were highlighted. Herein, we briefly summarize the breakthrough discoveries in EGIDs., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. All rights reserved.)

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic allergic inflammatory disease requiring maintenance therapy. Traditionally, EoE has been a contraindication to oral immunotherapy (OIT) and a rationale for discontinuing treatment because OIT may induce EoE. Most, but not all patients with OIT-induced EoE experience symptom resolution and histologic remission after discontinuing OIT. Recent studies report OIT continuation even after EoE onset, despite the previously accepted standard of care. This creates clinical as well as ethical challenges for allergists treating these patients. Considering the published literature on EoE and OIT and the primary medical ethics principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice, we discuss the ethical implications of pursuing desensitization despite the potential complications associated with EoE. When ethical principles are in opposition, shared decision-making should be employed to determine whether OIT should be continued after an EoE diagnosis. This article highlights the ethical dilemmas allergists face when determining whether patients with a diagnosis of EoE should continue OIT., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Continuing insight into the molecular mechanisms of atopic disorders has enabled the development of biologics to precisely target these diseases. Food allergy (FA) and eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) are driven by similar inflammatory molecular mechanisms and exist along the same atopic disease spectrum. Therefore, many of the same biologics are being investigated to target key drivers of mechanisms shared across the disease states. The enormous potential of biologics for the treatment of FA and EGIDs is highlighted by the significant increases in the number of ongoing clinical trials (more than 30) evaluating their use in these disease states, as well as by the recent US Food and Drug Administration approval of dupilumab for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. Here we discuss past and current research into the use of biologics in FA and EGIDs and their potential role in improving treatment options in the future, with the need to have biologics widely clinically available., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Substantial heterogeneity in terminology used for eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs), particularly the catchall term "eosinophilic gastroenteritis," limits clinical and research advances. We aimed to achieve an international consensus for standardized EGID nomenclature., Methods: This consensus process utilized Delphi methodology. An initial naming framework was proposed and refined in iterative fashion, then assessed in a first round of Delphi voting. Results were discussed in 2 consensus meetings, and the framework was updated and reassessed in a second Delphi vote, with a 70% threshold set for agreement., Results: Of 91 experts participating, 85 (93%) completed the first and 82 (90%) completed the second Delphi surveys. Consensus was reached on all but 2 statements. "EGID" was the preferred umbrella term for disorders of gastrointestinal (GI) tract eosinophilic inflammation in the absence of secondary causes (100% agreement). Involved GI tract segments will be named specifically and use an "Eo" abbreviation convention: eosinophilic gastritis (now abbreviated EoG), eosinophilic enteritis (EoN), and eosinophilic colitis (EoC). The term "eosinophilic gastroenteritis" is no longer preferred as the overall name (96% agreement). When >2 GI tract areas are involved, the name should reflect all of the involved areas., Conclusions: This international process resulted in consensus for updated EGID nomenclature for both clinical and research use. EGID will be the umbrella term, rather than "eosinophilic gastroenteritis," and specific naming conventions by location of GI tract involvement are recommended. As more data are developed, this framework can be updated to reflect best practices and the underlying science., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Diagnosis of non-esophageal eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders requires quantification of tissue eosinophils. Our objective was to evaluate eosinophil peroxidase (EPX) immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a method for histologic diagnosis of eosinophilic gastritis (EG) and eosinophilic duodenitis (EoD)., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of biopsies from pediatric EG/EoD cases and controls. Subjects with EG or EoD had ≥30 eosinophils per high power field (eos/hpf) in ≥5 hpf in the stomach and/or ≥3 hpf in the duodenum, respectively. Controls had no histopathologic diagnosis recorded. Tissue eosinophil counts were assessed by hematoxylin & eosin stains. EPX stains were assessed using a unique histopathologic scoring system. Slides were digitized and EPX+ staining area/mm 2 was quantified by image analysis., Results: Twenty-six EG/EoD cases and 40 controls were analyzed. EPX scores and EPX/mm 2 levels were markedly elevated in EG/EoD (p ≤ 0.0001). Eosinophil density (eos/mm 2 ) correlated strongly with EPX scores and EPX/mm 2 levels in the stomach (r ≥ 0.77) and moderately with EPX scores and EPX/mm 2 levels in the duodenum (r ≥ 0.52); (p < 0.0001). EPX quantification identified EG/EoD subjects with high diagnostic accuracy (EPX score: AUC = 1 for EG and EoD; EPX/mm 2 : AUC = 0.98 (95%CI 0.96-1) for EG, AUC = 0.91 (95%CI 0.81-1) for EoD)., Conclusion: EPX-based assessment of eosinophilic inflammation may facilitate automated histologic diagnosis.