Search

Intangible resources are highly desired by the organizations in the current economy, as a source of competitive advantage. As a consequence of the fast environmental degradation, stakeholders are significantly influencing the decision-making of companies in certain activity sectors. This paper argues that environmental knowledge is presented as a resource that enables the growth of the companies. Hotels need to consider environmental knowledge as a development strategy that is the reason why an analysis of the literature and qualitative descriptive study is made, to determine the key processes to manage the environmental knowledge in hotels. This research shows a framework to analyse environmental knowledge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A review of the literature confirms that there is a need for knowledge management frameworks which support knowledge creation, particularly in those organisations having to operate in a changing environment. Socialisation, externalisation, combination and internalisation continue to be key processes for the creation of knowledge which enables organisations to successfully address environmental challenges. This paper examines the relevance and importance of a SECI model as an enabler of the processes of reusing and updating the environmental knowledge of an organisation. The research reported has confirmed that time is a key component of the implementation of a SECI model in organisations operating in a changing environment. It has been confirmed that such a strategy should focus on the reuse of prior environmental knowledge as a mechanism to establish within the organisation a context where new knowledge management processes are understood and adopted by employees. The paper also examines the relationship between environmental knowledge and organisational performance indicators. These relationships are examined through an empirical study of 87 companies in the Spanish hospitality sector. The results of the study indicate that environmental knowledge at any given time (T) is significant in predicting the knowledge management processes that may be successfully implemented at a later point in time (T + 6 years). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]