1. Investigating stormwater pollution from marinas in the Great Lakes region and the hydrological and water quality mitigation provided by Green Infrastructure retrofits
- Author
-
Fast, Kathleen Marie
- Subjects
- Environmental Engineering, Environmental Science, Environmental Management, Hydrology, Water Resource Management, stormwater management, runoff, green infrastructure, marinas, water quality, hydrology, Great Lakes, ecological engineering
- Abstract
As catchments become increasingly impervious, urban stormwater pollutant loads, erosional force, and flooding increases. The practice of stormwater management is critical environmental protection that became regulated by the US federal government in the 1970s. With the need to attenuate peak flow rates and reduce the excess stormwater volumes generated from impervious catchments, stormwater control measures (SCMs) were developed such as stormwater detention basins, retention ponds, drainage ditches, and subsurface stormwater detention. Having a variety of SCMs available provides stakeholders with the ability to target specific aspects of stormwater management, including runoff quantity, runoff quality, or other ecosystem services.Regulations have evolved over time to have a greater emphasis on stormwater quality. As such, SCM design has evolved to address pollutant removal in stormwater. Green infrastructure (GI) practices, also called low impact development (LID) SCMs, have gained popularity for stormwater management since the start of the 21st century and incorporate principles of ecological engineering into stormwater management. Examples of GI include a variety of practices that use infiltration through filter media such as rain gardens, bioretention cells (BRCs), and high rate biofiltration (HRBF), permeable pavements, green roofs, and constructed stormwater wetlands (CSWs). The use of GI has benefits in addition to peak flow, volume, and pollutant reduction such as creating habitat for pollinators, cooling urban spaces, and adding attractive green space.Pollutant removal mechanisms vary between GI practices with some systems providing greater sedimentation and treatment of particulates and some providing greater treatment of dissolved pollutants through microbially-mediated transformation, plant uptake, and/or adsorption. Performance of SCMs varies based on design, site characteristics (e.g. topography, soil texture and infiltration capacity, depth to water table), and suitability of GI to treat site-specific pollutants. It is imperative to continue to understand how design and site characteristics influence performance so that design can be optimized and communities implementing GI for stormwater management receive the maximum return on investment.Before GI can be optimized for performance, runoff pollution must be characterized so that treatment mechanisms can be tailored to pollutants of concern. This body of research has been developed for decades for land uses such as commercial, residential, and industrial, but these land use characterizations are not exhaustive of all scenarios. One land use type for which stormwater pollutants have not been characterized is marinas. Copper is the primary additive to boat paint (in addition to Zn) for antifouling and when boats are sanded, scraped, and power washed, paint particles containing Cu and Zn are released. Past research has shown that marinas where boat maintenance is carried out have soils with high levels of heavy metal contamination. Heavy metals such as copper (Cu), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn) are the primary concern. Additionally, studies have found elevated concentrations of Cu in near-shore sediments around marinas. The use of GI practices has been suggested to intercept marina pollutants before they enter receiving waters. To do this, an understanding of both marina runoff and the performance of GI in treating this unique runoff is needed.To address this research gap, GI practices were constructed at several marinas throughout the Great Lakes region. The flow rates, volumes, and pollutant loads of stormwater runoff entering and leaving each GI practice was monitored. This allowed for the characterization of runoff pollution from marina sites as well as the assessment of GI practices in treating marina runoff.The first chapter of this dissertation characterizes marina pollutant concentrations and loads from catchments where boat maintenance does and does not occur. Consistent with prior studies, it was found that increased surface cover of gravel parking lots resulted in increased total suspended solids (TSS) loads. Additionally, elevated heavy metals were conveyed in stormwater, particularly for marinas where boat maintenance occurred. The loads of Pb and Zn were in the upper range of typical urban stormwater; however, the loads of Cu were an order of magnitude higher than those in the literature. Trends between sediment transport and heavy metal transport were not consistent between sites. In future studies, investigating the proportion of particulate to dissolved metals as well as the particle size distribution of TSS in runoff would provide greater insight into how marina runoff can best be treated. Chapters 2 and 3 of this dissertation compare the hydrologic and water quality performance of a BRC and HRBF at a marina. Hydrologic results and findings in Chapter 2 were consistent with expected performance; the greater storage volume of the BRC provided greater runoff volume reduction than the HRBF. Volume reduction of the HRBF was more negatively impacted by increased rainfall depth and intensity, which should be considered given projected changes to regional rainfall patterns due to climate change. However, due to the small size of HRBFs, they may be a good option for stormwater management in ultra-urban areas where real estate for stormwater treatment is extremely limited. Both SCMs at this site were hydrologically connected to urban karst on site through the gravel-backfilled outlet pipe trenches which daylighted through unsealed holes in the sheet pile wall. This allowed for unmonitored dewatering via the bottom of the GI practices. This study provided critical insight into the importance of considering urban karst hydrology when implementing GI.Chapter 3 focused on the water quality performance of a side-by-side BRC and HRBF. Results showed that the finer-grained, more poorly-sorted media of the BRC likely provided greater filtration of fine particles. This allowed for greater treatment of TSS and particle-bound nutrients and heavy metals. The HRBF had a higher ratio of catchment surface area to filter surface area and, in addition to the elevated TSS loads due to a gravel parking lot in the catchment, caused greater buildup of sediment on the surface of the mulch layer. This implied that maintenance needs are higher for the HRBF. Maintenance needs of a given SCM are an important consideration for stakeholders when selecting GI. The dewatering of the practices via the outlet pipes likely reduced contact time of runoff with media and thus removal of dissolved pollutants, specifically nitrite-nitrate (NO2,3), whose treatment depends on detention of runoff in an anoxic soil zone. The BRC provided significant reduction of Cu, Pb, and Zn which suggests that it may be a suitable practice for treating runoff from marinas with elevated heavy metal loads. Overall, the water quality performance of the BRC was better than the HRBF for all pollutants studied.An infiltrating CSW treating runoff from a marina catchment where boat maintenance occurs was assessed in Chapter 4. The sandy underlying soils at the site allowed for volume reduction due to exfiltration, which is atypical for a CSW, while the concurrently high water table ensured wetland conditions persisted. Hydrologic performance of the CSW declined slightly over the first three years after construction which is consistent with other CSW studies and highlights the importance of GI maturation before conclusions regarding performance are drawn. The CSW provided excellent removal of TSS, nutrient, and heavy metal loads. The forebay, vegetation, and sinuosity of the wetland allowed for sedimentation and treatment of particulates. The anoxic properties of wetland soils allowed for NO2,3 transformation and treatment. The accumulated organic matter likely promoted adsorption of metals. Between the two cells of the CSW, 51% of the overall 57% reduction in Cu concentrations was provided by cell 1. This supports findings of other studies that have suggested that subsequent practices in treatment trains that use the same pollutant removal mechanisms provide decreasing return on investment. This study showed that infiltrating CSWs are a reliable option for treating marina runoff, which is promising given the prevalence of high water tables at marinas. Additionally, implementation of CSWs in coastal areas of the Great Lakes region might have co-benefits such as improving coastal resilience to the increased variation in water levels that have been projected for the Great Lakes due to climate change.The primary finding from Chapter 1 of this dissertation was that Cu loading rates from marinas where boat maintenance occurs are nearly a degree of magnitude higher than those from marinas where boat maintenance does not occur, commercial catchments, and industrial catchments. Regarding treatment of Cu provided by the studied SCMs, both the BRC and CSW provided significant event-load reductions of Cu with annual load reductions of 86 and 83%, respectively. Both SCMs also provided excellent treatment of TSS, with annual load reductions for the BRC and CSW of 93 and 94%, respectively. The median effluent Cu concentrations resulting from treatment by the BRC (23±8.8 µg/L) were lower than that of CSW (129±62 µg/L). It should be noted that the runoff concentrations of Cu were significantly higher in the CSW catchment; however, volume reduction provided by the BRC (26%) was also lower than the CSW (69%) which affects load reductions. The enhanced Cu removal provided by the BRC can be attributed to the increased contact between runoff and filter media surface area, which may have promoted adsorption of dissolved Cu. The comparison of BRC and CSW may be biased based on the unknown ratio of particulate Cu and dissolved Cu, as correlations suggested the catchment of the CSW may have contained elevated levels of dissolved Cu. In summary, the use of both sedimentation and adsorption is recommended for the treatment of Cu by SCMs receiving runoff from marina catchments where boat maintenance occurs to ensure remove of total and dissolved Cu.Findings from this dissertation contribute to the current body of research regarding GI hydrologic and water quality performance. These data are important for the continued optimization of design specifications for stormwater management regulatory compliance. Additionally, investigating the runoff characteristics and treatment from marinas provides greater insight for practitioners such as the Great Lakes Clean Marinas Network who were essential project partners to this work. This research relied on collaboration between extension specialists, researchers, and community partners at each field site. Partnerships such as this promote research for real-world applications that answer useful questions for stormwater practitioners and stakeholders. Continuing to understand how to optimize stormwater management will allow for increased efficiency with resources and improved stormwater management outcomes.
- Published
- 2024