1. Sulfonamide-Linked Ciprofloxacin, Sulfadiazine and Amantadine Derivatives as a Novel Class of Inhibitors of Jack Bean Urease; Synthesis, Kinetic Mechanism and Molecular Docking.
- Author
-
Channar PA, Saeed A, Albericio F, Larik FA, Abbas Q, Hassan M, Raza H, and Seo SY
- Subjects
- Amantadine analogs & derivatives, Amantadine chemical synthesis, Amantadine chemistry, Ciprofloxacin analogs & derivatives, Ciprofloxacin chemical synthesis, Ciprofloxacin chemistry, Enzyme Inhibitors chemical synthesis, Fabaceae chemistry, Fabaceae enzymology, Free Radical Scavengers chemical synthesis, Inhibitory Concentration 50, Kinetics, Molecular Docking Simulation, Structure-Activity Relationship, Sulfadiazine analogs & derivatives, Sulfadiazine chemical synthesis, Sulfadiazine chemistry, Sulfonamides chemical synthesis, Urease chemistry, Enzyme Inhibitors chemistry, Free Radical Scavengers chemistry, Sulfonamides chemistry, Urease antagonists & inhibitors
- Abstract
Sulfonamide derivatives serve as an important building blocks in the drug design discovery and development (4D) process. Ciprofloxacin-, sulfadiazine- and amantadine-based sulfonamides were synthesized as potent inhibitors of jack bean urease and free radical scavengers. Molecular diversity was explored and electronic factors were also examined. All 24 synthesized compounds exhibited excellent potential against urease enzyme. Compound 3e (IC
50 = 0.081 ± 0.003 µM), 6a (IC50 = 0.0022 ± 0.0002 µM), 9e (IC50 = 0.0250 ± 0.0007 µM) and 12d (IC50 = 0.0266 ± 0.0021 µM) were found to be the lead compounds compared to standard (thiourea, IC50 = 17.814 ± 0.096 µM). Molecular docking studies were performed to delineate the binding affinity of the molecules and a kinetic mechanism of enzyme inhibition was propounded. Compounds 3e , 6a and 12d exhibited a mixed type of inhibition, while derivative 9e revealed a non-competitive mode of inhibition. Compounds 12a , 12b , 12d , 12e and 12f showed excellent radical scavenging potency in comparison to the reference drug vitamin C., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF