Search

Background: RalA is a member of the Ras superfamily of small GTPases. The Anti-RalA autoantibodies (s-RalA-Abs) act as tumor markers in various types of cancer and are negatively associated with the p53 autoantibodies (s-p53-Abs). This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between s-RalA-Abs and s-p53-Abs in various types of cancer. Methods: A total of 1833 cancer patients (esophageal cancer, 172; hepatocellular carcinoma, 91; lung cancer, 269; gastric cancer, 317; colon cancer, 262; breast cancer, 364; and prostate cancer, 358) and 73 healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. The levels of s-RalA-Abs and s-p53-Abs were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and the positivity rates and relations between the two autoantibodies were evaluated. The cutoff values for s-RalA abs and s-p53 abs were set as mean + 2 standard deviation and the values higher than the cutoff values were defined as positive. Results: The titers in all cancer types were significantly higher than those in the controls (P < 0.01). The positivity rates for s-RalA-Abs ranged between 11.7 and 21.5%, and those for s-p53-Abs ranged between 12 and 28.5%. A combined assay of the two antibodies revealed positivity rates of 20.9 and 44.2%. In Stage 0/I/II tumors, the positivity rates of the combination of the two antibodies ranged between 21.5 and 42.3%. The two autoantibodies were complementary to each other in the prostate and breast cancers, but independent in other carcinomas. Conclusion: The combined use of s-RalA-Abs and s-p53-Abs tended to increase the positivity rate in all cancers, including Stage 0/I/II cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) inhibitor has been approved as one of the standard therapies for various cancers. Some reports have shown that serum PD‐L1 level is associated with advanced tumor stages and poor prognosis; however, corresponding pathological information in esophageal cancer patients is lacking. Therefore, we evaluated the clinicopathological and prognostic impact of serum PD‐L1 levels in surgically treated esophageal cancer. Methods: A total of 150 patients who underwent radical resection for esophageal cancer were included in the study. Preoperative serum PD‐L1 levels were analyzed using the enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay kit. A cutoff level of 65.6 pg/mL was used to divide the patients into two groups, and univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to compare the clinicopathological characteristics and prognoses between these two groups. Results: Although significant associations between serum PD‐L1 levels and clinicopathological variables were observed, serum PD‐L1 level was significantly associated with high neutrophil counts, high CRP levels, low albumin levels, and high squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels. Furthermore, serum PD‐L1 level was associated with poor overall survival independent to TNM factors. Conclusions: High preoperative level of serum PD‐L1 is a prognostic factor for poor overall survival in patients with surgically treated esophageal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: We evaluated the diagnostic impact of serum midkine (s‐MK) levels in patients with gastric cancer using a monoclonal antibody enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay system (ELISA) to detect s‐MK levels. Methods: Serum samples were obtained from 131 patients with gastric cancer including stage I (n = 71), stage II (n = 28), stage III (n = 16), and stage IV (n = 16) before surgery. Serum samples were analyzed using ELISA to detect soluble midkine. A cut‐off value was fixed at 421 pg/mL, and the sample divided into two groups: a high s‐MK group and a low s‐MK group. Clinicopathological factors and prognosis were compared between these two groups using univariate and multivariate analyses. Comparison of two groups was analyzed by Fisher's exact probability test. Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05. Results: High s‐MK was significantly associated with high carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (P < 0.01). Positive rate of s‐MK was higher than the positive rates of CEA in patients with stage I/II gastric cancer. Combination with CEA + CA19‐9 + s‐MK increased the positive rates of patients with stage I/II gastric cancer. No other clinicopathological factors were associated with s‐MK. Although the high s‐MK group showed worse overall survival than the low s‐MK group, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: s‐MK level is increased even during early‐stage gastric cancer. Combined with s‐MK, the positive rate of CEA + CA19‐9 was increased in patients with stage I/II gastric cancer. s‐MK level is increased even during early‐stage gastric cancer. Combined with s‐MK, the positive rate of CEA + CA19‐9 was increased in patients with stage I/II gastric cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The sensitivity and specificity of a new automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay system, Elecsys® Anti-p53 (Elecsys), were compared with that of the conventional serum anti-p53 antibody (s-p53-Ab) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit [MESACUP anti-p53 test (MESACUP)]. Elecsys and MESACUP were used to analyze the levels of s-p53-Abs in patients with esophageal, colorectal and breast cancer. A total of 532 controls and 288, 235 and 329 patients with esophageal, colorectal and breast cancer, respectively, were enrolled. Additionally, the sera of patients with benign diseases of the esophagus, colorectal system and breast, patients with autoimmune diseases and healthy volunteers were analyzed as controls. Sensitivity and specificity were compared between the two assay systems. Positive agreement rates were 58.7% in all samples, 71.2% in esophageal samples, 73.6% in colorectal samples and 35.1% in breast samples. Negative agreement rates for the different cancer types were ≥97.1% and the overall agreement rates were ≥92.3%. When the specificities of the two assays were aligned for all samples, Elecsys demonstrated higher sensitivities for all types of analyzed cancer together, as well as for esophageal, colorectal and breast cancer, respectively. Although positive concordance between the two assay systems was low in terms of specificity, Elecsys had a higher sensitivity than the MESACUP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although serum galectin-1 antibodies (s-GAL-1-Abs) have been evaluated in a small number of patients with cancer, a large series of patients with different cancer types have not been reported. The current study evaluated 1,833 patients with esophageal cancer (n=172), gastric cancer (n=317), colorectal cancer (n=262), hepatocellular carcinoma (n=91), prostate cancer (n=358), breast cancer (n=364), lung cancer (n=269) and 72 healthy individuals. s-GAL-1-Abs levels were analyzed using an originally developed ELISA system. A cut-off optical density value was determined as the mean (0.053) + 3 standard deviations (0.105) of sera from healthy controls. The results revealed that the positive rate of s-GAL-1-Abs in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (16.7%) and lung cancer (13.8%) were significantly higher compared with the other groups: Esophageal cancer (11.6%), colorectal cancer (11.5%), prostate cancer (7.3%), gastric cancer (6.9%), breast cancer (6.9%) and healthy controls (4.2%). Although the positive rates of s-GAL-1-Abs in different cancer types were relatively low, s-GAL-1-Abs may be useful for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and lung cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ras-like GTPases, RalA and RalB, are members of the Ras superfamily of small GTPases. RalA expression has been shown to be associated with aggressive clinicopathological characteristics and progression in cancer. RalA protein has been shown to be involved in immune reactions in some patients with cancer; however, the clinicopathological significance of serum RalA antibody in patients with gastric cancer has not been investigated. Serum samples of 291 patients with gastric cancer and 73 healthy controls were analyzed for serum RalA antibody using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A cut-off optical density value was fixed at 0.255 (mean of control + 2 standard deviations). The clinicopathological and prognostic significance of s-RalA-Abs was evaluated. The positivity rate for serum RalA antibody (s-RalA-Abs) was 15%. The presence of serum RalA antibody was higher in younger patients compared with elderly patients, however this tendency was not statistically significant. s-RalA-Abs was not associated with tumor stage. Since s-RalA-Abs was independent of CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), the combination of s-RalA-Abs with CEA and CA19-9 significantly increased the detection rate of gastric cancer at each tumor stage. Patients who were tested positive for s-RalA-Abs showed poor long-term survival; however, this association was not statistically significant by multivariate analysis. In conclusion, s-RalA-Abs may be a candidate serum marker for gastric cancer, when used in combination with CEA and/or CA19-9. Additionally, the presence of s-RalA-Abs, in combination with CEA and/or CA19-9, was associated with poor survival in patients with gastric cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]