Search

Aims: The blue light-sensitive chloride-conducting opsin, stGtACR2, provides potent optogenetic silencing of neurons. The present study investigated whether activation of stGtACR2 in granule cells of the dentate gyrus (DG) inhibits epileptic afterdischarges in a rat model., Methods: Rats were bilaterally injected with 0.9 μl of AAV2/7-CaMKIIα-stGtACR2-fusionred in the DG. Three weeks later, afterdischarges were recorded from the DG by placing an optrode at the injection site and a stimulation electrode in the perforant path (PP). Afterdischarges were evoked every 10 min by unilateral electrical stimulation of the PP (20 Hz, 10 s). During every other afterdischarge, the DG was illuminated for 5 or 30 s, first ipsilaterally and then bilaterally to the PP stimulation. The line length metric of the afterdischarges was compared between illumination conditions., Results: Ipsilateral stGtACR2 activation during afterdischarges decreased the local field potential line length only during illumination and specifically at the illuminated site but did not reduce afterdischarge duration. Bilateral illumination did not terminate the afterdischarges., Conclusion: Optogenetic inhibition of excitatory neurons using the blue-light sensitive chloride channel stGtACR2 reduced the amplitude of electrically induced afterdischarges in the DG at the site of illumination, but this local inhibitory effect was insufficient to reduce the duration of the afterdischarge., (© 2022 The Authors. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Modulation of the locus coeruleus (LC)-noradrenergic system is a key mechanism of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). Activation of the LC produces pupil dilation, and the VNS-induced change in pupil diameter was demonstrated in animals as a possible dose-dependent biomarker for treatment titration., Objective: This study aimed to characterize VNS-induced pupillary responses in epileptic patients., Methods: Pupil diameter was recorded in ten epileptic patients upon four stimulation conditions: three graded levels of VNS intensity and a somatosensory control stimulation (cutaneous electrical stimulation over the left clavicle). For each block, the patients rated the intensity of stimulation on a numerical scale. We extracted the latency of the peak pupil dilation and the magnitude of the early (0-2.5 s) and late components (2.5-5 s) of the pupil dilation response (PDR)., Results: VNS elicited a peak dilation with longer latency compared to the control condition (p = 0.043). The magnitude of the early PDR was significantly correlated with the intensity of perception (p = 0.046), whereas the late PDR was not (p = 0.19). There was a significant main effect of the VNS level of intensity on the magnitude of the late PDR (p = 0.01) but not on the early PDR (p = 0.2). The relationship between late PDR magnitude and VNS intensity was best fit by a Gaussian model (inverted-U)., Conclusions: The late component of the PDR might reflect specific dose-dependent effects of VNS, as compared to control somatosensory stimulation. The inverted-U relationship of late PDR with VNS intensity might indicate the engagement of antagonist central mechanisms at high stimulation intensities., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome. We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us. We confirm that we have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated with this work and that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of publication, with respect to intellectual property. In so doing we confirm that we have followed the regulations of our institutions concerning intellectual property. We further confirm that any aspect of the work covered in this manuscript that has involved either experimental animals or human patients has been conducted with the ethical approval of all relevant bodies and that such approvals are acknowledged within the manuscript. We understand that the Corresponding Author is the sole contact for the Editorial process (including Editorial Manager and direct communications with the office). He/she is responsible for communicating with the other authors about progress, submissions of revisions and final approval of proofs. We confirm that we have provided a current, correct email address which is accessible by the Corresponding Author and which has been configured to accept email from: simone.vespa@uclouvain.be., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an adjunctive therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy. Noninvasive evoked potential recordings in laryngeal muscles (LMEPs) innervated by vagal branches may provide a marker to assess effective vagal nerve fiber activation. We investigated VNS-induced LMEPs in patients with epilepsy in acute and chronic settings., Materials and Methods: A total of 17 of 25 patients underwent LMEP recordings at initiation of therapy (acute group); 15 of 25 patients after one year of VNS (chronic group); and 7 of 25 patients were tested at both time points (acute + chronic group). VNS-induced LMEPs were recorded following different pulse widths and output currents using six surface laryngeal EMG electrodes to calculate input/output curves and estimate LMEP latency, threshold current for minimal (I threshold ), half-maximal (I 50 ), and 95% of maximal (I 95 ) response induction and amplitude of maximal response (V max ). These were compared with the acute + chronic group and between responders and nonresponders in the acute and chronic group., Results: VNS-induced LMEPs were present in all patients. I threshold and I 95 values ranged from 0.25 to 1.00 mA and from 0.42 to 1.77 mA, respectively. Estimated mean LMEP latencies were 10 ± 0.1 milliseconds. No significant differences between responders and nonresponders were observed. In the acute + chronic group, I threshold values remained stable over time. However, at the individual level in this group, V max was lower in all patients after one year compared with baseline., Conclusions: Noninvasive VNS-induced LMEP recording is feasible both at initiation of VNS therapy and after one year. Low output currents (0.25-1.00 mA) may be sufficient to activate vagal Aα-motor fibers. Maximal LMEP amplitudes seemed to decrease after chronic VNS therapy in patients., (Copyright © 2022 International Neuromodulation Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

On-demand stimulation improves the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in refractory epilepsy. The vagus nerve is the main peripheral parasympathetic connection and seizures are known to exhibit autonomic symptoms. Therefore, we hypothesized that seizure detection is possible through vagus nerve electroneurogram (VENG) recording. We developed a metric able to measure abrupt changes in amplitude and frequency of spontaneous vagus nerve action potentials. A classifier was trained using a "leave-one-out" method on a set of 6 seizures and 3 control recordings to utilize the VENG spike feature-based metric for seizure detection. We were able to detect pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) induced acute seizures in 6/6 animals during different stages of the seizure with no false detection. The classifier detected the seizure during an early stage in 3/6 animals and at the onset of tonic clonic stage of the seizure in 3/6 animals. EMG and motion artefacts often accompany epileptic activity. We showed the "epileptic" neural signal to be independent from EMG and motion artefacts. We confirmed the existence of seizure related signals in the VENG recording and proved their applicability for seizure detection. This detection might be a promising tool to improve efficacy of VNS treatment by developing new responsive stimulation systems.

Purpose: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an established treatment for refractory epilepsy. The ADNS-300 is a new system for VNS that includes a rechargeable stimulus generator and an electrode for combined stimulation and recording. In this feasibility study, three patients were implanted with ADNS-300 for therapeutic VNS. In addition, compound action potentials (CAPs) were recorded to evaluate activation of the vagus nerve in response to VNS., Methods: Three patients were implanted with a cuff-electrode around the left vagus nerve, that was connected to a rechargeable pulse generator under the left clavicula. Two weeks after surgery, therapeutic VNS (0.25-1.25 mA, 500 μs, 30s on, 10 min off and 30Hz) was initiated and stimulus-induced CAPs were recorded., Results: The ADNS-300 system was successfully implanted in all three patients and patients were appropriately stimulated during six months of follow-up. A reduction in seizure frequency was demonstrated in two patients (43% and 40% in patients 1 and 3, respectively), while in patient 2 seizure frequency remained unchanged. CAPs could be recorded in patients 1 and 2, proving stimulation-induced activation of the vagus nerve., Conclusion: This feasibility study demonstrates that the ADNS-300 system can be used for combined therapeutic stimulation (in 3/3 patients) and recording of CAPs in response to VNS (in 2/3 patients) up to three weeks after surgery. Implantation in a larger number of patients will lead to a better understanding of the electrophysiology of the vagus nerve, which in turn could result in more adequate and individualized VNS parameter choice., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Epilepsy is a neurological disorder consisting of recurrent seizures, resulting from excessive, uncontrolled electrical activity in the brain. Epilepsy treatment is successful in the majority of the cases; however; still one third of the epilepsy patients are refractory to treatment. Besides the ongoing research on the efficacy of antiepileptic treatments in suppressing seizures (anti-seizure effect), we want to seek for therapies that can lead to plastic, neuromodulatory changes in the epileptic network. Neuropharmacological therapy with levetiracetam (LEV) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) are two novel treatments for refractory epilepsy. LEV acts rapidly on seizures in both animal models and humans. In addition, preclinical studies suggest that LEV may have antiepileptogenic and neuroprotective effects, with the potential to slow or arrest disease progression. VNS as well can have an immediate effect on seizures in epilepsy models and patients with, in addition, a cumulative effect after prolonged treatment. Studies in man are hampered by the heterogeneity of patient populations and the difficulty to study therapy-related effects in a systematic way. Therefore, investigation was performed utilizing two rodent models mimicking epilepsy in humans. Genetic absence epilepsy rats from Strasbourg (GAERS) have inborn absence epilepsy and Fast rats have a genetically determined sensitivity for electrical amygdala kindling, which is an excellent model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Our findings support the hypothesis that treatment with LEV and VNS can be considered as neuromodulatory: changes are induced in central nervous system function or organization as a result of influencing and initiating neurophysiological signals.

Objectives Vagus nerve stimulation ( VNS) is an effective treatment for refractory epilepsy. It remains unknown whether VNS efficacy is dependent on output current intensity. The present study investigated the effect of various VNS output current intensities on cortical excitability in the motor cortex stimulation rat model. The hypothesis was that output current intensities in the lower range are sufficient to significantly affect cortical excitability. Material and methods VNS at four output current intensities (0 mA, 0.25 mA, 0.5 mA and 1 mA) was randomly administered in rats ( n = 15) on four consecutive days. Per output current intensity, the animals underwent five-one-hour periods: (i) baseline, (ii) VNS1, (iii) wash-out1, (iv) VNS2 and (v) wash-out2. After each one-hour period, the motor seizure threshold ( MST) was measured and compared to baseline (i.e. ∆ MSTbaseline, ∆ MSTVNS1, ∆ MSTwash-out1, ∆ MSTVNS2 and ∆ MSTwash-out2). Finally, the mean ∆ MSTbaseline, mean ∆ MSTwash-out1, mean ∆ MSTwash-out2 and mean ∆ MSTVNS per VNS output current intensity were calculated. Results No differences were found between the mean ∆ MSTbaseline, mean ∆ MSTwash-out1 and mean ∆ MSTwash-out2 within each VNS output current intensity. The mean ∆ MSTVNS at 0 mA, 0.25 mA, 0.5 mA and 1 mA was 15.3 ± 14.6 μA, 101.8 ± 23.5 μA, 108.1 ± 24.4 μA and 85.7 ± 18.1 μA respectively. The mean ∆ MSTVNS at 0.25 mA, 0.5 mA and 1 mA were significantly larger compared to the mean ∆ MSTVNS at 0 mA ( P = 0.002 for 0.25 mA; P = 0.001 for 0.5 mA; P = 0.011 for 1 mA). Conclusions This study confirms efficacy of VNS in the motor cortex stimulation rat model and indicates that, of the output current intensities tested, 0.25 mA is sufficient to decrease cortical excitability and higher output current intensities may not be required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]