Search

Purpose: We investigated whether visual field defects could be objectively evaluated using multifocal visual evoked potential(m-VEP) in two children with epilepsy caused by intracranial disease in whom it was difficult to measure the visual field., Methods: To determine normal waves in m-VEP, recording was performed using a visual evoked response imaging system(VERIS)Junior Science program (Mayo, Aichi, Japan) in 20 healthy children (20 eyes); peak latency and amplitude were used for assessment. In the two children with epilepsy, m-VEPs were recorded, and compared with the results of static perimetry or the lesions observed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)., Results: In the 20 healthy children, there was no significant difference in the peak latency or amplitude among 4 quadrants by one-way analysis of variance. m-VEP in the children with epilepsy showed abnormal waves, corresponding to the visual field defects in the static perimetry or the lesions observed by MRI., Conclusions: Objective evaluation of visual field defects using m-VEP may be useful in children with epilepsy caused by intracranial disease in whom kinetic/static perimetry as a subjective examination is difficult.

Object: To evaluate objectively the visual fields of patients with pediatric epilepsy who are uncooperative with perimetry and in whom postoperative visual field deficits are expected, the authors investigated the usefulness of the multifocal visual evoked potential (VEP) method., Methods: Normal waves in multifocal VEP were determined in 21 healthy children (21 eyes) 6 to 15 years of age (mean 11.4 years). Responses from eight sites in each child were divided into four quadrants (superior and inferior temporal and superior and inferior nasal). In each quadrant, two response waves were grouped and averaged. The peak latency and amplitude at approximately 100 msec were used for assessment. In three cases involving patients with epilepsy, multifocal VEP measurements were also recorded and compared with the peak latency and amplitude in the healthy children. In these children, no significant differences were observed in the peak latency of amplitude among four quadrants using one-way analysis of variance. In each patient, multifocal VEP tests showed abnormal waves in the quadrant corresponding to the lesion demonstrated in neuroradiological images. This result was useful in the treatment of choice and the postoperative evaluation., Conclusions: Multifocal VEP tests can be useful in evaluating the visual field of children objectively. They can also be valuable in assessing preoperative visual field defects and revealing changes in the visual field after treatment.

Purpose: We investigated whether visual field defects can be objectively evaluated by using multifocal visual evoked potential (multifocal VEP) in children with epilepsy in whom it is difficult to measure the visual field., Methods: First, to determine normal waves in multifocal VEP, recording was performed by using a VERIS Junior Science (Mayo, Aichi, Japan) in 21 healthy children (21 eyes) consisting of 12 boys and nine girls aged 6 to 15 years (mean age, 11.4 years). Responses from eight sites in each subject were divided into four quadrants (superior and inferior temporal quadrants and superior and inferior nasal quadrants). In each quadrant, two response waves were grouped and averaged; peak latency and amplitude were used for assessment. In a child with epilepsy in whom kinetic or static perimetry was impossible, multifocal VEPs were recorded and compared with the peak latency and amplitude in the healthy subjects., Results: In the 21 healthy children, no significant differences were observed in the peak latency or amplitude among four quadrants by one-way analysis of variance. Multifocal VEPs in the child with epilepsy showed abnormal waves in the right hemivisual field, which corresponded to the lesion observed with magnetic resonance imaging., Conclusions: The objective evaluation of visual field defects by using multifocal VEP may be useful in children with epilepsy in whom kinetic/static perimetry as a subjective examination is difficult.

We examined the reliability of multifocal visual evoked potentials for evaluating visual-field defects in a child with epilepsy and an arachnoid cyst. Multifocal visual evoked potentials were measured both when perimetry was difficult and several years later, when kinetic perimetry became possible in a child with epilepsy and homonymous hemianopia, as suggested by computed tomography of the brain. The peak latency and amplitude of response waves were used for assessment. The recordings of multifocal visual evoked potentials at both times revealed marked decreases in amplitude in the left visual hemifield. This area of decreased amplitude corresponded to the location of the lesion observed with imaging techniques, and was consistent with the left homonymous hemianopia observed via kinetic perimetry. The objective evaluation of visual-field defects through multifocal visual evoked potentials may be useful in children in whom conventional perimetry is difficult. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]