Search

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a powerful tool for estimating brain connectivity with both good spatial and temporal resolution. It is particularly helpful in epilepsy to characterize non-invasively the epileptic networks. However, using MEG to map brain networks requires solving a difficult inverse problem that introduces uncertainty in the activity localization and connectivity measures. Our goal here was to compare independent component analysis (ICA) followed by dipole source localization and the linearly constrained minimum-variance beamformer (LCMV-BF) for characterizing regions with interictal epileptic activity and their dynamic connectivity. After a simulation study, we compared ICA and LCMV-BF results with intracerebral EEG (stereotaxic EEG, SEEG) recorded simultaneously in 8 epileptic patients, which provide a unique 'ground truth' to which non-invasive results can be confronted. We compared the signal time courses extracted applying ICA and LCMV-BF on MEG data to that of SEEG, both for the actual signals and the dynamic connectivity computed using cross-correlation (evolution of links in time). With our simulations, we illustrated the different effect of the temporal and spatial correlation among sources on the two methods. While ICA was more affected by the temporal correlation but robust against spatial configurations, LCMV-BF showed opposite behavior. Moreover, ICA seems more suited to retrieve the simulated networks. In case of real patient data, good MEG/SEEG correlation and good localization were obtained in 6 out of 8 patients. In 4 of them ICA had the best performance (higher correlation, lower localization distance). In terms of dynamic connectivity, the evolution in time of the cross-correlation links could be retrieved in 5 patients out of 6, however, with more variable results in terms of correlation and distance. In two patients LCMV-BF had better results than ICA. In one patient the two methods showed equally good outcomes, and in the remaining two patients ICA performed best. In conclusion, our results obtained by exploiting simultaneous MEG/SEEG recordings suggest that ICA and LCMV-BF have complementary qualities for retrieving the dynamics of interictal sources and their network interactions., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no competing financial interests., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Recording from deep neural structures such as hippocampus noninvasively and yet with high temporal resolution remains a major challenge for human neuroscience. Although it has been proposed that deep neuronal activity might be recordable during cognitive tasks using magnetoencephalography (MEG), this remains to be demonstrated as the contribution of deep structures to MEG recordings may be too small to be detected or might be eclipsed by the activity of large-scale neocortical networks. In the present study, we disentangled mesial activity and large-scale networks from the MEG signals thanks to blind source separation (BSS). We then validated the MEG BSS components using intracerebral EEG signals recorded simultaneously in patients during their presurgical evaluation of epilepsy. In the MEG signals obtained during a memory task involving the recognition of old and new images, we identified with BSS a putative mesial component, which was present in all patients and all control subjects. The time course of the component selectively correlated with stereo-electroencephalography signals recorded from hippocampus and rhinal cortex, thus confirming its mesial origin. This finding complements previous studies with epileptic activity and opens new possibilities for using MEG to study deep brain structures in cognition and in brain disorders., (© 2022 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)