Search

Objective: This review was undertaken to review epinephrine dosing, site and route of administration, focusing on special populations (patients weighing less than 15 kg, and obese patients); and to discuss storage and delivery of epinephrine in prehospital and hospital settings., Data Sources: Review of published literature., Study Selection: Relevance., Results: The recommended 0.01-mg/kg (maximum 0.3-0.5 mg) epinephrine dose in anaphylaxis is based on limited pharmacokinetic data in healthy volunteers. No pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamics studies involving patients in anaphylaxis have been published. When epinephrine auto-injectors (EAIs) are used in infants, the dose increasingly exceeds the recommended dose as weight decreases, although the clinical significance of this is unclear. Limited data indicate that the intramuscular route and lateral thigh site are superior. Ultrasound studies suggest that 0.15 EAI needles may be too long for many patients weighing less than 15 kg, and 0.3 mg EAI needles may be too short for obese patients weighing more than 30 kg. A newly available 0.1 mg EAI has a lower dose and shorter needle better suited to patients weighing 7.5 to 15 kg. In some medical settings, vials and syringes may provide a safe, efficient alternative with substantial cost savings over EAIs., Conclusion: EAIs should be available in the community with doses and needle depths that meet the needs of all patients. More research on epinephrine pharmacodynamics are needed in children and adults in anaphylaxis, to better delineate what optimal doses should be. Optimizing epinephrine dose and delivery has the potential to improve anaphylaxis outcomes and prevent adverse events., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Inhaled epinephrine is a potential alternative to self-administered intramuscular epinephrine in imminent anaphylactic reactions. The objective was to develop a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model describing exposure and effects on heart rate of inhaled epinephrine. Data from a 4-phase cross-over clinical trial in 9 healthy volunteers including 0.3 mg intramuscular epinephrine, two doses of inhaled epinephrine (4 mg/mL solution administered during [mean] 18 and 25 min, respectively) using a mobile pocket inhaler, and an inhaled placebo were analyzed using mixed-effects modeling. Inhaled epinephrine was available almost immediately and more rapidly than via the intramuscular route (absorption half-live 29 min). Epinephrine plasma concentrations declined rapidly after terminating inhalation (elimination half-life 4.1 min) offering the option to stop exposure in case of adverse events. While the expected maximum concentration was higher for inhaled epinephrine, this was not associated with safety concerns due to only moderate additional hemodynamic effects compared to intramuscular administration. Bioavailability after inhalation (4.7%) was subject to high interindividual and interoccasional variability highlighting that training of inhalation would be essential for patients. The proposed model suggests that the use of a highly concentrated epinephrine solution via inhalation may offer an effective treatment option in anaphylaxis, while efficacy in patients remains to be shown., (Copyright © 2015 The Japanese Society for the Study of Xenobiotics. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: IV infusion systems can be configured with manifolds connecting multiple drug infusion lines to transcutaneous catheters. Prior in vitro studies suggest that there may be significant lag times for drug delivery to reflect changes in infusion rates set at the pump, especially with low drug and carrier flows and larger infusion system dead-volumes. Drug manifolds allow multiple infusions to connect to a single catheter port but add dead-volume. We hypothesized that the time course of physiological responses to drug infusion in vivo reflects the impact of dead-volume on drug delivery., Methods: The kinetic response to starting and stopping epinephrine infusion ([3 mL/h] with constant carrier flow [10 mL/h]) was compared for high- and low-dead-volume manifolds in vitro and in vivo. A manifold consisting of 4 sequential stopcocks with drug entering at the most upstream port was contrasted with a novel design comprising a tube with separate coaxial channels meeting at the downstream connector to the catheter, which virtually eliminates the manifold contribution to the dead-volume. The time to 50% (T50) and 90% (T90) increase or decrease in drug delivery in vitro or contractile response in a swine model in vivo were calculated for initiation and cessation of drug infusion., Results: The time to steady state after initiation and cessation of drug infusion both in vitro and in vivo was much less with the coaxial low-dead-volume manifold than with the high-volume design. Drug delivery after initiation in vitro reached 50% and 90% of steady state in 1.4 ± 0.12 and 2.2 ± 0.42 minutes with the low-dead-volume manifold and in 7.1 ± 0.58 and 9.8 ± 1.6 minutes with the high-dead-volume manifold, respectively. The contractility in vivo reached 50% and 90% of the full response after drug initiation in 4.3 ± 1.3 and 9.9 ± 3.9 minutes with the low-dead-volume manifold and 11 ± 1.2 and 17 ± 2.6 minutes with the high-dead-volume manifold, respectively. Drug delivery in vitro decreased by 50% and 90% after drug cessation in 1.9 ± 0.17 and 3.5 ± 0.61 minutes with the low-dead-volume manifold and 10.0 ± 1.0 and 17.0 ± 2.8 minutes with the high-dead-volume manifold, respectively. The contractility in vivo decreased by 50% and 90% with drug cessation in 4.1 ± 1.1 and 14 ± 5.2 with the low-dead-volume manifold and 12 ± 2.7 and 23 ± 5.6 minutes with the high-dead-volume manifold, respectively., Conclusions: The architecture of the manifold impacts the in vivo biologic response, and the drug delivery rate, to changes in drug infusion rate set at the pump.

Background: Intramuscular (L-)epinephrine is used as self-medication for serious hypersensitivity reactions. Inhalative administration has the theoretical advantage of a more rapid absorption and better controllability., Objectives: The current trial was conducted to explore pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two nebulized inhalative epinephrine doses (4 mg and 8 mg in aqueous solution) using a mobile pocket inhaler relative to intramuscular administration (0.3 mg) and placebo., Methods: This randomized, open-label, change-over pilot study involved eight young healthy men and women. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were calculated from epinephrine plasma concentrations and hemodynamic parameters., Results: Mean exposure to epinephrine decreased from the 8 mg dose to the 4 mg inhalative dose, and further with the 0.3 mg intramuscular dose, with active treatments showing significantly higher concentrations than placebo (geometric mean area under the curve AUC0-t(last) values: 282, 236, 204 and 81.6 hr*ng/L). Maximal concentrations were reached within approximately 15 min for all active treatments. Epinephrine effects for inhalative administrations on heart rates were significantly higher than those for the intramuscular or placebo administration, while no excessive effects occurred. Pronounced overall variability prohibited a definite assessment of relative bioavailability between treatments. However, results indicated that epinephrine concentrations obtained following the 8 mg inhalative dose were not inferior to those after 0.3 mg i.m., Conclusions: A relevant fraction of moist inhalation epinephrine doses is absorbed and mediates systemic effects. This suggests that administration of epinephrine via a suitable pocket inhaler device may be beneficial in ambulatory emergency treatment of systemic hypersensitivity reactions. EudraCT number: 2010-021493-11.

Background: If intravenous access cannot be attained during resuscitation of adult patients, endotracheal application of at least 2 mg of adrenaline is recommended. However, the effects of this intervention have not yet been demonstrated in adults., Objective: To demonstrate the effects of adrenaline administered through the airways., Design: Prospective clinical trial., Setting: Operating theater at university hospital., Patients: 34 patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators under general anesthesia., Intervention: When mean arterial pressure decreased below 80 mm Hg, 100 times the effective central intravenous dose of adrenaline (mean +/- SD, 1.3+/-0.6 mg [range, 0.7 to 3 mg]) was administered over 5 seconds into the endotracheal tube or through a bronchial catheter. Ten forced ventilations followed., Measurements: Hemodynamic variables were recorded with a polygraph recorder. Adrenaline levels were measured in 13 patients., Results: Plasma levels and arterial pressure increased in all patients (P < 0.002). Higher plasma levels (P < 0.039) and greater arterial pressure (P < 0.001) were achieved with this method than with intravenous injection. The effects of adrenaline did not differ between the two airway routes. Sustained ventricular arrhythmia did not occur., Conclusion: These substantial effects support the standard recommendation to consider the airways as an alternate route for at least 2 mg of adrenaline during resuscitation.

Purpose: To investigate the effect of indomethacin inhibition of prostanoid production on the epinephrine-stimulated increase in outflow facility and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production in the anterior segment of the monkey eye., Methods: Topical indomethacin was given 1 hour before the intracameral administration of epinephrine to living cynomolgus monkeys. Outflow facility was measured for 45 to 60 minutes, beginning 3 hours after epinephrine administration, by two-level constant pressure perfusion of the anterior chamber. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate formation was measured in cell membranes isolated from rhesus monkey ciliary muscle, ciliary processes, trabecular meshwork, and iris in the presence of forskolin, indomethacin, epinephrine, or indomethacin and epinephrine combined., Results: Three hours after the intracameral administration of 5.5 micrograms epinephrine, facility increased by approximately 40%, a putatively maximal response, at which time the intracameral epinephrine concentration was approximately 15 microM. Pretreatment with topical indomethacin produced a dose-dependent inhibition of epinephrine's facility-increasing effect; the maximum inhibition of 50% to 70% occurred at an indomethacin dose of 50 to 125 micrograms. Doubling the indomethacin dose (250 micrograms) produced no further inhibition, whereas a fivefold larger epinephrine dose (27.5 micrograms) did not overcome the inhibition. Forskolin and epinephrine both stimulated cAMP production in vitro, whereas [indomethacin] > or = 10(-4) M partially inhibited both basal and epinephrine-stimulated cAMP production in all four tissues., Conclusions: Approximately half of the epinephrine-induced facility increase is inhibited by indomethacin, but it is unclear whether the indomethacin-inhibitable fraction is mediated by epinephrine-stimulated prostanoid production or release.