Search

Background: One advantage of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS‐HGS) is that it is difficult for reflux cholangitis, caused by duodenal pressure increasing due to duodenal obstruction, to occur. In addition, since stent deployment is performed away from the malignant stricture site, longer stent patency than with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) may be obtained. However, no study has previously compared EUS‐HGS and ERCP for patients without duodenal obstruction or surgically altered anatomy. The aim of the present study was to compare clinical outcomes between EUS‐HGS and ERCP in normal anatomy patients without duodenal obstruction. Method: In the ERCP group, patients who initially underwent biliary drainage were included. In the EUS‐HGS group, patients who underwent EUS‐HGS due to failed biliary cannulation were included. Patients with an inaccessible papilla, such as with surgically altered anatomy or duodenal obstruction, were excluded. Results: A total of 314 patients who underwent ERCP and EUS‐HGS were enrolled in this study. Of the 314 patients, 289 underwent biliary stenting under ERCP guidance, and 25 patients underwent biliary stenting under EUS‐HGS. After propensity score‐matching analysis, the adverse event rate tended to be lower in the EUS‐HGS group than in the ERCP group. Although overall survival was not significantly different between the EUS‐HGS and ERCP groups (p =.228), stent patency was significantly longer in the EUS‐HGS group (median 366.0 days) than in the ERCP group (median 76.5 days). Conclusions: EUS‐HGS had a lower adverse event rate, shorter procedure time, and longer stent patency than ERCP in cases of normal anatomy without duodenal obstruction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) has traditionally been the standard modality for pancreatic endotherapy. However, in certain situations, failure of retrograde ductal access may warrant an alternative modality of drainage. This can occur in various settings like difficult and/or surgically altered anatomy or duodenal obstruction. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD) is a relatively newer addition to the armamentarium for endoscopic access to the PD. Areas covered: This comprehensive state-of-art review aims to give an overview of the indications, technical details, different approaches, and outcomes of EUS-PDD, with the latest evidence available in scientific literature. Expert opinion: Akin to its biliary drainage counterpart, EUS-PDD enables an EUS-assisted-ERP using rendezvous technique or EUS-guided drainage through transmural stenting. The technique has evolved over the ensuing years with multitude of accessories, approaches, and devices to optimize the outcomes. However, the technical success and adverse events rates need to be further improved. Additionally, it has a steep learning curve with requirements of advanced technical skill and optimum infrastructure back-up. Meticulous patient selection, precise knowledge of ductal anatomy, appropriate approach, and carefully chosen accessories can improve its clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Technical tips for device insertion during endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) have not been reported. To improve the technical success rate of device insertion without unnecessary tract dilation, the pushing force should be transmitted directly from the channel of the echoendoscope to the intrahepatic bile duct. Objectives: We developed a novel technique, termed the 'moving scope technique', the feasibility of which during EUS-HGS is described. Design: Retrospective study. Methods: The primary outcome of this study was the technical success rate of dilation device insertion without electrocautery dilation after the moving scope technique. The initial technical success rate of dilation device insertion was defined as successful insertion into the biliary tract. If dilation device insertion failed, the moving scope technique was attempted. Results: A total of 143 patients were enrolled in this study. The initial technical success rate for device insertion was 80.4% (115/143). The moving scope technique was therefore attempted in 28 patients. The mean angle between the intrahepatic bile duct and the guidewire was improved to 141.0° and resulted in a technical success rate of 100% (28/28). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.88, and 120° predicted successful dilation device insertion with sensitivity of 88.0% and specificity of 78.8%. Bile peritonitis (n = 8) and cholangitis (n = 2) were observed as adverse events, but were not severe. Conclusion: In conclusion, the moving scope technique may be helpful during EUS-HGS to achieve successful insertion of the dilation device into the biliary tract. These results should be evaluated in a prospective randomized controlled trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: If the guidewire becomes kinked by the needle, guidewire manipulation may be difficult, and can cause complications such as guidewire shearing or injury during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS). To overcome this matter, we have previously described a technical tip for preventing guidewire injury, termed 'liver impaction technique'. However, its technical feasibility has been not reported in the setting of a large patient cohort. Objectives: The aim of study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the liver impaction technique during EUS-HGS. Design: Retrospective, single-center study. Methods: This retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent EUS-HGS between April 2018 and September 2022. The primary outcome of this study was the technical success rate of guidewire insertion using the liver impaction technique. Results: A total of 166 patients were enrolled in this study. Initial successful guidewire insertion without using liver impaction technique was obtained in 108 patients (65.1%). Among 58 patients in whom guidewire insertion failed initially, guidewire advancement into the periphery of the bile duct was observed in 32 patients (55.2%) and into a non-interest bile duct branch was observed in 26 patients (44.8%). Liver impaction technique contributed to increasing the technical success rate of guidewire insertion from 65.1% to 95.8%. Overall, adverse events were observed in 12 patients (7.2%; bile peritonitis n = 9, cholangitis n = 3), and these adverse events were Grade I. Among patients who underwent liver impaction technique (n = 58), adverse events were observed in two patients (3.4%; bile peritonitis). Also, guidewire sharing was not observed in any patients during liver impaction technique. Conclusions: In conclusion, the liver impaction technique may be helpful during EUS-HGS to obtain successful guidewire insertion into the biliary tract of interest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although the SpyGlass Direct Visualization System can be clinically useful for diagnosing indeterminate biliary stricture, it employs SpyBite forceps, which typically obtain only a small amount of tissue and have a low sampling rate. An improved forceps biopsy device for SpyGlass DS has recently been released (SpyBite MAX). The aim of this prospective registration study was to assess the diagnostic yield and efficacy of histological biopsy tissue obtained with SpyBite MAX forceps compared with SpyBite forceps in patients with indeterminate biliary stricture. Methods: The primary outcome of the study was the diagnostic accuracy of biopsy specimens obtained by SpyBite MAX forceps. The secondary outcomes were tissue size, number of forceps biopsies, rate of obtaining adequate tissue, and adverse events in the SpyBite MAX forceps group compared with the SpyBite group. Results: Forceps biopsies using SpyBite MAX (n = 47) and SpyBite (n = 50) were performed successfully in all patients. The number of biopsies performed before visible core tissue was obtained was significantly lower in the SpyBite (mean, 1.5 ± 0.7) than in the SpyBite forceps group (mean, 2.3 ± 1.1 mm; P <.001). Tissue sample size was larger in the SpyBite MAX group (mean, 1.8 ± 1.6 mm2) than in the SpyBite group (mean, 1.0 ± 0.9 mm2; P =.004) but there was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy. Conclusion: Improvements in dedicated forceps for biopsy in SpyGlass DS may contribute to improving the rates of adequate tissue and tissue sample size obtained, and to reducing the number of forceps biopsies required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and aim: Pancreato-biliary patients who undergo endoscopic procedures have high potential risk of delirium. Although benzodiazepine has traditionally been used to treat insomnia, this drug might increase delirium. Lemborexant may be useful for patients with insomnia, without worsening delirium, although there is no evidence for high-risk patients with pancreato-biliary disease. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lemborexant for insomnia and the frequency of delirium after endoscopic procedures under deep sedation in patients with pancreato-biliary disease. Method: This retrospective study included consecutive patients who were administered lemborexant after endoscopic procedures for pancreato-biliary disease between September 2020 and June 2022. The primary outcome of this study was evaluation of the safety and efficacy of lemborexant for insomnia. Frequency of delirium was the secondary outcome. Result: In total, 64 patients who had the complication of insomnia after an endoscopic procedure were included in the study. Risk factors for delirium were advanced age (n = 36, 56.3%), dementia (n = 10, 15.6%), and regular alcohol use (n = 13, 20.3%), as well as the sedatives midazolam and pentazocine that were administered to all patients at the time of the endoscopic procedure. Successful asleep was achieved by 61/64 patients (95.3%). No fall event was observed during the night following the procedure in any patient. However, mild consciousness transformation was observed in one patient. Conclusions: In conclusion, lemborexant use may be effective and safe for use after endoscopic procedures in pancreato-biliary patients, without increasing the risk of delirium. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Recently, a novel self-assembling peptide hemostatic gel has become available in Japan. However, the safety and efficacy of this novel self-assembling peptide hemostatic gel remain unclear for bleeding after EST. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel self-assembling peptide hemostatic gel for bleeding after EST, and to perform a comparison to a conventional endoscopic hemostasis technique. Method: This retrospective study was carried out between January 2019 and October 2022. Patients who developed bleeding associated with EST were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups based on the hemostasis technique used: a conventional hemostasis technique (Group A) or a novel self-assembling peptide hemostatic gel hemostasis technique (Group B). Result: A total of 62 patients (Group A, n = 36; Group B, n = 26) were included. Endoscopic hemostasis was initially obtained in 72.2% (26/32) of patients in Group A and in 88.4% (23/26) of patients in Group B, which was not significantly different (p = 0.1320). However, the procedure time was significantly shorter in Group B (mean, 9.38 min) compared with Group A (mean, 15.4 min) (p = 0.0103). There were no significant differences in the severity of bleeding between the two groups (p = 0.4530). Post-EST bleeding was observed in six patients (Group A, n = 4; Group B, n = 2). Adverse events were more frequently observed in Group A (n = 12) than in Group B (n = 1) (p = 0.0457). Conclusions: PuraStat application for EST bleeding might be safe and effective, and is comparable to the conventional endoscopic hemostasis technique, although further prospective randomized trials are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: After multiple uncovered self-expandable metal stent (UCSEMS) deployments, endoscopic revision becomes complex and potentially challenging. A novel stent delivery system with a dilation function has recently been developed in Japan. This study evaluated the technical feasibility of this device for patients with unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHO) after multiple UCSEMS deployments. Method: Participants comprised consecutive patients with unresectable MHO who had undergone multiple UCSEMS deployments and required endoscopic revision for the right or left hepatic bile ducts, as decided by cholangiography under endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) guidance. Results: A total of 14 patients requiring endoscopic revision of right and left hepatic bile ducts were enrolled in this study. Among these 14 patients, guidewire insertion through the mesh of previously placed stents failed in 2 patients. As a result, these two patients underwent only unilateral UCSEMS deployment. Because clinical success was not obtained, transmural placement of the UCSEMS under Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) guidance to the segment of the liver not being drained was performed in those patients. The molting technique was attempted in 12 patients, proving successful in all patients. The technical success rate was therefore 92.8% (12/14). Mean procedure time was 23.2 min. Conclusion: This novel stent delivery system with a dilation function may be useful in endoscopic revision techniques for bilateral UCSEMS deployment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recently, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐guided biliary drainage has been developed as an alternative biliary drainage technique for failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or inaccessible papilla. Among the various EUS‐guided biliary drainage procedures, EUS‐guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) can be performed in patients with surgically altered anatomy. More recently, various transluminal treatments have been described after EUS‐HGS, such as antegrade stone removal. In patients with hepaticojejunostomy strictures, stone extraction into the intestine might be challenging even after performing hepaticojejunostomy stricture dilation using a balloon catheter. In such cases, transluminal stone removal is considered an alternative method. With transluminal stone removal, a small stone that escapes from the conventional basket or from a balloon catheter could migrate into the branch bile ducts. The novel spiral basket catheter available in Japan. The wires form a helix shape, wherein each wire is wound counterclockwise, and the winding pitch becomes gradually tighter from the proximal portion to the tip. As the winding pitch is smaller and the wires are in closer contact with the bile duct wall as compared with conventional basket catheter, small bile duct stones can be easily captured by simply pulling back the catheter while the basket is open. In addition, even during withdrawal inside the bile duct, a high retrieval performance is assured by the special design that maintains the opening width on the top end. Therefore, transluminal stone removal using this novel basket catheter might be clinically useful, although further prospective evaluation of a larger number of cases is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)‐guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) is of clinical benefit in patients with failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, some endoscopists are concerned about the potential risk of adverse events. Bile peritonitis due to bile leakage through the fistula is one of the possible adverse events following EUS‐HGS. Recently, a novel laser‐cut type partially covered self‐expandable metal stent (PCSEMS), which is a dedicated stent for EUS‐HGS, has become available. This stent has an uncovered part, despite it being a laser‐cut type stent, along with a flared end. In addition, it uses a 7‐Fr stent delivery. Therefore, tract dilation might not be needed to deploy the stent, which might reduce the incidence of stent migration. In this study, the safety of EUS‐HGS using this novel laser‐cut type PCSEMS was evaluated by assessing technical success, which was defined as successful stent deployment, and clinical success, which was defined as reduction in serum total bilirubin levels by 50% and resolution of symptoms related to biliary tract obstruction within 2 weeks. Five patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction underwent EUS‐HGS using the novel stent. Stent deployment was successfully performed without tract dilation in four patients, although tract dilation using a balloon catheter was needed in one patient. Clinical success was obtained in all patients, and adverse events including abdominal pain and bile peritonitis were not observed in any of the patients. EUS‐HGS without tract dilation can be safely performed using a novel laser‐cut type PCSEMS. A prospective comparative study evaluating this stent versus conventional stents is needed to corroborate our results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

EUS‐guided biliary drainage (EUS‐BD) has been indicated for benign biliary strictures. However, the intrahepatic bile duct is sometimes much narrower in benign biliary strictures. In this situation, puncture of the intrahepatic bile duct using a 19‐G needle is sometimes challenging. Several reports have described attempts at EUS‐BD using a 22‐G needle, but fistula dilation with a 22‐G needle is challenging because the 0.018‐inch guidewire is not stiff enough to perform dilatation. Recently, a thin mechanical dilator has become available. After its insertion into the biliary tract, the 0.018‐inch guidewire can be replaced with a 0.025‐inch guidewire. We herein describe the technical procedure of EUS‐guided hepaticogastrostomy using a 22‐G needle with a thin mechanical dilator. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim Re-intervention after stent placement for malignant hepatic hilum obstruction (HBO) is challenging. endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been developed as an alternative method for failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In this retrospective study, the clinical utility of EUS-BD as a rescue drainage technique for HBO patients who failed re-intervention under ERCP guidance was evaluated. Methods Between April 2012 and August 2015, patients with HBO were enrolled. Patients' characteristics, kinds of metallic stents, configuration of stent placement, overall survival, stent patency, and results of re-intervention were reviewed, along with the re-intervention technical success rate. Results The biliary stricture type was Bismuth type IV in 59% (23/39) and types IIIa and b in 20.5% (8/39) each. Biliary metallic stent placement was bilateral in 38.5% (15/39), and unilateral in 61.5% (24/39). Primary stent dysfunction was observed in 71.8% (28/39) of cases. Planned re-intervention under ERCP guidance was attempted in 26 patients. The technical success rate was 62% (16/26). For the 10 patients who failed re-intervention under ERCP guidance, EUS-BD was planned. The technical success rate was 100% (10/10). The procedure time was 25.8 min. Adverse events were not seen in any patients. Stent patency after re-intervention was not significantly different between ERCP (165 days) guidance and EUS-BD (152 days) guidance ( P = 0.463) Conclusions In conclusion, EUS-BD as a re-intervention method for metallic stent obstruction was safe and feasible. If ERCP was failed, EUS-BD may be one of option as re-intervention method for high-grade hilar stricture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Approximately 10–15% of bile duct stones cannot be treated using conventional stone removal techniques. For difficult common bile duct stones (CBDS), various endoscopic techniques have been developed. This review covers technical tips and endoscopic treatments including Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), particularly under Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance. Areas covered: Literatures about endoscopic treatment for bile duct stone were searched in Pub Med. As novel methods, EUS-guided approaches have also been reported, although long-term results and prospective evaluation are not yet sufficient. Large stones may need fragmentation prior to removal, to prevent stone impaction. To perform fragmentation, mechanical lithotripsy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or laser lithotripsy techniques are available. Expert commentary: Despite the fact that most bile duct stones can be treated using endoscopic techniques, endoscopists should remind to be able to select the temporary biliary stenting or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage as an option. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background: Temporary stent placement is widely performed for pancreatic duct stenosis due to chronic pancreatitis. A fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) has a larger diameter, and therefore longer stent patency, and the effect of expansion of the main pancreatic duct stricture may be obtained. However, if stent migration upstream occurs, stent removal is extremely difficult. In addition, because of the diameter gap between the FCSEMS and the main pancreatic duct, stent-induced ductal change may occur. To prevent these adverse events, the technical feasibility, safety and efficacy of the placement of a novel 6 mm diameter FCSEMS with a long suture, to facilitate its removal in cases of stent migration upstream, were evaluated in a pilot study. Methods: Between December 2014 and August 2015, symptomatic chronic pancreatitis patients with abdominal pain and a main pancreatic head duct stricture were enrolled. Stent placement for main pancreatic duct stricture was performed under endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) guidance and stent removal was performed within 6 months. Results: A total of 13 patients were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Metal stent insertion was successfully performed in all patients and clinical success was high (12/13, 92%). As adverse events, stent migration upstream was seen in two patients. Another 11 patients successfully underwent stent removal without any adverse events. During follow up (median 258 days), 2 patients still underwent pancreatic duct stenting because of continuing main pancreatic duct stricture. Conclusion: In conclusion, this novel FCSEMS is acceptable for stent placement in cases of chronic pancreatitis with a main pancreatic duct stricture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim The evidence for main pancreatic duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms ( MPD- IPMN) malignancy is based predominantly on investigation of resected cases, and the natural history is still unclear. The aim of the present study is to investigate the natural history of MPD- IPMN and examine potential predictors of disease progression in MPD- IPMN patients who conformed to 'high-risk stigmata' criteria. Methods This study included consecutive 20 follow-up patients and 19 surgical patients with 'high-risk stigmata' MPD- IPMN, in whom the diameter of the MPD was > 10 mm, branch duct was < 5 mm, and who underwent clinical follow up for ≥ 2 years. Results Among surgical patients, mural nodules and MPD diameter of invasive patients were significantly different compared with non-invasive patients. On the other hand, among follow-up patients, univariate analysis revealed the following potential predictors for disease progression: diameter of MPD ≥ 15 mm (hazard ratio [ HR], 20.9; 95% confidence interval [ CI], 2.59-173.4; P < 0.01); and diffuse lesions of MPD- IPMN ( HR, 4.46; 95% CI, 1.10-18.0; P = 0.04). On the other hand, multivariate analysis identified only diameter of MPD ≥ 15 mm ( HR, 19.2; 95% CI, 1.87-198.5; P = 0.01) as a potential predictor of disease progression. Conclusion If MPD- IPMN patients have other severe complications or reasons for not undergoing surgical treatment, MPD diameter < 15 mm, negative cytology, and no mural nodules, conservative clinical follow up for several years may be an option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]