Search

Expansion of drainage networks through the headward erosion of tidal creeks is an eco‐geomorphologic response of salt marshes to accelerated sea‐level rise (SLR). This response can counter the negative impacts of an elevation deficit by increasing drainage and encouraging plant health, thereby reducing potential for submergence and marsh platform loss. In the wetlands of Cape Romain, SC, intense bioturbation near creek heads by the common marsh crab Sesarma reticulatum has been found to facilitate sediment erosion and rapid creek growth. This keystone grazer has been recently observed to have increasing influence on landscape evolution throughout the southeast US coast. Here, we compare measurements taken at Sapelo Island, GA, with those previously collected at Cape Romain, to confirm that eco‐geomorphic feedbacks facilitating creek growth at each location are similar, and to compare these processes under differing background conditions. We use sediment cores, precise elevation measurements and historical imagery to compare substrate properties, elevation within the tidal frame, creek growth rates and drainage morphology at both sites. Our results show identical processes; however, the higher elevation of the marsh at Sapelo Island leads to shallower and shorter periods of tidal inundation, explaining the greater soil strength and lower belowground biomass compared with the marsh at Cape Romain. The smaller tidal range at the site in Cape Romain compared with Sapelo Island translates to a proportionally shallower depth of tidal creeks, which therefore requires less erosion to produce headward creek extension. These effects are likely to have contributed to slower growth rates of tidal creeks at Sapelo Island during the past several decades of SLR. Our findings highlight the similarities in process but differences in rates in how marshes are responding to climate‐related stress. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

When longshore transport systems encounter tidal inlets, complex mechanisms are involved in bypassing sand to downdrift barriers. Here, this process is examined at Plum Island Sound and Essex Inlets, Massachusetts, USA. One major finding from this study is that sand is transferred along the coast—especially at tidal inlets—by parcels, in discrete steps, and over decadal-scale periods. The southerly orientation of the main-ebb channel at Plum Island Sound, coupled with the landward migration of bars from the ebb delta to the central portion of the downdrift Castle Neck barrier island, have formed a beach protuberance. During the constructional phase, sand is sequestered at the protuberance and the spit-end of the barrier becomes sediment starved, leading to shoreline retreat and a broadening of the spit platform at the mouth to Essex Bay (downdrift side of Castle Neck). Storm-induced sand transport from erosion of the spit and across the spit platform is washed into Essex Bay, filling channels and enlarging flood deltas. This study illustrates the pathways and processes of sand transfer along the shoreline of a barrier-island/tidal-inlet system and provides an important example of the processes that future hydrodynamic and sediment-transport modeling should strive to replicate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We tested the hypothesis that mangroves provide better coastal protection than salt marsh vegetation using 10 1,008‐m2 plots in which we manipulated mangrove cover from 0 to 100%. Hurricane Harvey passed over the plots in 2017. Data from erosion stakes indicated up to 26 cm of vertical and 970 cm of horizontal erosion over 70 months in the plot with 0% mangrove cover, but relatively little erosion in other plots. The hurricane did not increase erosion, and erosion decreased after the hurricane passed. Data from drone images indicated 196 m2 of erosion in the 0% mangrove plot, relatively little erosion in other plots, and little ongoing erosion after the hurricane. Transects through the plots indicated that the levee (near the front of the plot) and the bank (the front edge of the plot) retreated up to 9 m as a continuous function of decreasing mangrove cover. Soil strength was greater in areas vegetated with mangroves than in areas vegetated by marsh plants, or nonvegetated areas, and increased as a function of plot‐level mangrove cover. Mangroves prevented erosion better than marsh plants did, but this service was nonlinear, with low mangrove cover providing most of the benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The survival of salt marshes depends on their ability to maintain vertical elevation and areal extent. In the lateral direction, marsh edges can expand laterally or undergo edge erosion through mass failure or continuous particle erosion through waves and tidal processes. In this study, we evaluate possible relationships between marsh shoreline type within the Great Marsh in Massachusetts and major geotechnical parameters along the marsh edge. We also explore if wave energy, using fetch as a proxy, affects the presence, type, and distribution of shoreline type. We mapped and classified the marsh into four categories: slumping, vertical and abrading, stable/accretionary, and bedrock or gravel, and sampled the marsh edge at 98 sites. Using over 450 measurements, we present typical ranges of values at these marsh edges for bulk density (0.10–1.43 g/cm3), organic content (0.99–55.07%), belowground biomass (0.11–36.76%), and shear strength (4.04–136.49 kPa at 20 cm into the marsh bank, and 4.04–131.03 kPa at 40 cm into the bank). We show that there are no significant differences in fetch or geotechnical properties for the different marsh edge classes. Thus, none of these parameters explain or correlate with edge erosion, even though the majority of previous edge erosion studies focus on these parameters as determinants of edge erosion. We further emphasize the heterogeneity of the marsh, as edge erosion can occur in highly exposed or sheltered areas alike with no trends in geotechnical properties, and that complex interactions between parameters not generally studied may be responsible for edge erosion. • This large-scale field study examined the relationships among geotechnical properties, fetch, and edge erosion at over 90 sites. • Neither fetch nor the geotechnical properties of marsh banks explained the type and distribution of marsh edge erosion. • Previously identified parameters do not explain the observed system, suggesting more complex interactions are causing edge erosion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]