Search

The protein-gene pairs ArgP-argO of Escherichia coli and LysG-lysE of Corynebacterium glutamicum are orthologous, with the first member of each pair being a LysR-type transcriptional regulator and the second its target gene encoding a basic amino acid exporter. Whereas LysE is an exporter of arginine (Arg) and lysine (Lys) whose expression is induced by Arg, Lys, or histidine (His), ArgO exports Arg alone, and its expression is activated by Arg but not Lys or His. We have now reconstituted in E. coli the activation of lysE by LysG in the presence of its coeffectors and have shown that neither ArgP nor LysG can regulate expression of the noncognate orthologous target. Of several ArgP-dominant (ArgP(d)) variants that confer elevated Arg-independent argO expression, some (ArgP(d)-P274S, -S94L, and, to a lesser extent, -P108S) activated lysE expression in E. coli. However, the individual activating effects of LysG and ArgP(d) on lysE were mutually extinguished when both proteins were coexpressed in Arg- or His-supplemented cultures. In comparison with native ArgP, the active ArgP(d) variants exhibited higher affinity of binding to the lysE regulatory region and less DNA bending at both argO and lysE. We conclude that the transcription factor LysG from a Gram-positive bacterium, C. glutamicum, is able to engage appropriately with the RNA polymerase from a Gram-negative bacterium, E. coli, for activation of its cognate target lysE in vivo and that single-amino-acid-substitution variants of ArgP can also activate the distantly orthologous target lysE, but by a subtly different mechanism that renders them noninterchangeable with LysG.

Expression of lysP, which encodes the lysine-specific transporter LysP in Escherichia coli, is regulated by the concentration of exogenous available lysine. In this study, the LysR-type transcriptional regulator ArgP was identified as the activator of lysP expression. At lysine concentrations higher than 25 μM, lysP expression was shut off and phenocopied an argP deletion mutant. Purified ArgP-His(6) bound to the lysP promoter/control region at a sequence containing a conserved T-N(11)-A motif. Its affinity increased in the presence of lysine but not in the presence of the other known coeffector, arginine. In vivo data suggest that lysine-loaded ArgP and arginine-loaded ArgP compete at the lysP promoter. We propose that lysine-loaded ArgP prevents lysP transcription at the promoter clearance step, as described for the lysine-dependent regulation of argO (R. S. Laishram and J. Gowrishankar, Genes Dev. 21:1258-1272, 2007). The global regulator Lrp also bound to the lysP promoter/control region. An lrp mutant exhibited reduced lysP expression in the absence of external lysine. These results indicate that ArgP is a major regulator of lysP expression but that Lrp modulates lysP transcription under lysine-limiting conditions.

In vivo and in vitro analyses indicate that transcription of the argO gene coding for an arginine exporter is regulated by the global transcriptional regulator Lrp, an effect that went by unnoticed in previous genome-scale screenings of the Lrp regulatory network in Escherichia coli. Lrp activates the argO promoter fourfold; exogenous leucine antagonizes, but does not completely eliminate this effect. Activation by Lrp interferes with the previously demonstrated activation of the argO promoter by ArgP. This interference results from the mutual inhibitory binding of the two activators to overlapping targets. As a consequence, each regulator acts more potently in the absence of the other. Dimeric Lrp binds cooperatively to at least three regularly spaced semi-palindromic binding sites. Leucine reduces complex formation approximately twofold but concomitantly enhances the cooperativity of the binding. Footprinting data suggest a severe Lrp-induced deformation of the argO control region. Combined, the effector modulated activation of argO transcription by ArgP and Lrp must ensure an adapted and fine-tuned synthesis of the transporter in response to environmental conditions. The repertoire of bacterial transcription regulation mechanisms is vast, but the competitive activation of a single promoter by two activator proteins as described here appears to be rare.