Search

Purpose: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the role of timed barium esophagogram (TBE) in quantitative measurement of improved esophageal emptying in primary achalasia patients treated with POEM. Also, we investigated the correlation of TBE with improvement of clinical symptoms as measured by Eckardt score., Methods: This retrospective study included 30 patients who underwent POEM due to primary achalasia. As a baseline study, all patients underwent TBE and were evaluated for clinical status by Eckardt score based on presence and frequency of dysphagia, regurgitation, substernal pain, and weight loss. Follow-up evaluation was performed within 3 months after POEM. Pre- and post-POEM TBE results were compared using a calculated value based on summation of height of the barium columns on 1-, 2- and 5-min delayed images. Also, the correlation of TBE with improvement of Eckardt score was evaluated using Pearson's correlation test., Results: There was a significant decrease in the calculated value of height between pre- and post-POEM TBE studies (40.5 ± 15.8-17.0 ± 11.6, p < 0.01). Also, the Eckardt score decreased significantly after POEM (6.7 ± 2.0-0.8 ± 1.0, p < 0.01). Pearson's correlation test revealed a positive correlation between improvement of TBE results and Eckardt score (correlation coefficient = 0.56, p < 0.01)., Conclusion: TBE is an objective method for quantitative measurement of improved esophageal emptying in primary achalasia patients treated with POEM and shows positive correlation with clinical symptoms evaluated by Eckardt score., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Aim: The functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) is a recently developed technique to evaluate the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) distensibility. Unlike timed barium esophagogram (TBE) and high-resolution manometry (HRM), FLIP can be used during peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of intraoperative FLIP parameters with clinical outcomes as recorded in a single-center database and to investigate a systematic review of literatures., Methods: We reviewed consecutive patients diagnosed with achalasia and scheduled for POEM between June 2016 and March 2019 in our tertiary referral hospital. All patients underwent intraoperative FLIP assessment during POEM. The final FLIP measurements were compared between the patients with good and poor clinical response. We comprehensively reviewed studies evaluating whether intraoperative FLIP measurements reflected clinical outcomes., Results: We evaluated 23 patients with achalasia who underwent intraoperative FLIP before and after POEM. Two exhibited poor clinical responses after 3 months (Eckardt scores = 3). The final distensibility index (DI) did not differ significantly between good and poor responders (5.01 [4.52] vs. 4.91 [3.63-6.20] mm2/mmHg at a balloon distension of 50-mL, median [IQR], P = 0.853). The final DI did not differ significantly between post-POEM reflux esophagitis and non-reflux esophagitis groups (6.20 [5.15] vs. 4.23 [1.79] mm2/mmHg at a balloon distension of 50-mL, median [IQR], P = 0.075)., Conclusions: A systematic review of both prospective and retrospective studies including our data indicated that the final intraoperative FLIP measurements did not differ significantly between good and poor responders. Further study with more patients is necessary to explore whether FLIP can predict short- and long-term clinical responses., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background and Aims: Although both per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and Heller myotomy (HM) have been used for the treatment of achalasia, the comparative efficacy of POEM and HM has yet to be fully evaluated., Methods: We searched all relevant studies published up to September 2018 examining the comparative efficacy between POEM and HM. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analyses for Eckardt scores, perioperative outcomes, and reflux-related outcomes were performed based on a random-effects model., Results: Fifteen studies with a total of 1213 patients were evaluated. The follow-up duration ranged from 2 to 46.2 months and from 2 to 54.2 months in the POEM and HM groups, respectively. Postoperative Eckardt scores were lower (better) in the POEM group than in the HM group (pooled standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.03 to -0.13). Length of myotomy was greater in the POEM group than in the HM group (pooled SMD, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.84). There was no difference in reflux symptoms and pathologic reflux on pH monitoring between the groups (pooled risk ratio [RR], 1.03; 95% CI, 0.61-1.73; and pooled RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.67-2.25, respectively). Erosive esophagitis on endoscopy tended to be less common in the HM group (pooled RR, 1.88; 95% CI, 0.98-3.62)., Conclusion: Although long-term follow-up data are insufficient, the short-term efficacy of POEM was superior to that of HM. Erosive esophagitis tended to be more common in the POEM group; however, there was no difference in reflux symptoms and pathologic reflux on pH monitoring between the groups., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background/aims: We evaluated whether manometric subtype is associated with treatment outcome in patients with achalasia treated by peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)., Methods: High-resolution manometry data and Eckardt scores were collected from 83 cases at two tertiary referral centers where POEM is performed. Manometric tracings were classified according to the three Chicago subtypes., Results: Among the 83 cases, 48 type I, 24 type II, and 11 type III achalasia cases were identified. No difference was found in pre-POEM Eckardt score, basal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, or integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) among the type I, type II, and type III groups. All three patient groups showed a significant improvement in post-POEM Eckardt score (6.1±2.1 to 1.5±1.5, p=0.001; 6.8±2.2 to 1.2±0.9, p=0.001; 6.6±2.0 to 1.6±1.4, p=0.011), LES pressure (26.1±13.8 to 15.4±6.8, p=0.018; 32.3±19.0 to 19.2±10.4, p=0.003; 36.8±19.2 to 17.5±9.7, p=0.041), and 4s IRP (21.5±11.7 to 12.0±8.7, p=0.007; 24.5±14.8 to 12.0±7.6, p=0.002; 24.0±15.7 to 11.8±7.1, p=0.019) at a median follow-up of 16 months., Conclusions: POEM resulted in a good clinical outcome for all manometric subtypes.

Background/aims: We conducted the present study to investigate the recovery of peristalsis of the esophageal body and evaluate the pressure changes observed on manometry before and after endoscopic intervention., Materials and Methods: Forty-five patients were diagnosed with achalasia, and 36 received endoscopic or surgical treatment. We collected the data of 24 patients who underwent manometry before and after treatment (pneumatic balloon dilatation, n=7; botulinum toxin injection, n=10; peroral endoscopic myotomy, n=7)., Results: The lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure and nadir LES relaxation pressure decreased regardless of the achalasia subtype or type of endoscopic intervention following treatment (p<0.05). Among patients with a nadir LES relaxation pressure of <4 mmHg, 42.9% (6/14) exhibited partial esophageal peristaltic wave recovery. However, no patients with a nadir LES relaxation pressure of >4 mmHg exhibited peristaltic wave recovery (p=0.024). Of the six patients with peristaltic wave recovery, two had type I achalasia (15.4%), three had type II (33.3%), and one had type III (100.0%). The Eckardt score, symptom duration, and type of intervention were not associated with the recovery of peristaltic waves., Conclusion: Our results suggest that normalization of the nadir LES relaxation pressure can be a predictive factor for the recovery of esophageal peristalsis.

Background/aims: We compared the long-term outcomes of balloon dilation versus botulinum toxin injection in Korean patients with primary achalasia and identified factors predicting remission., Methods: We included 73 patients with achalasia newly diagnosed between January 1988 and January 2011. We ultimately enrolled 37 of 55 patients with primary achalasia through telephone interviews, who were observed for over 1 year. Short-term outcomes were evaluated from the medical records based on symptom relief after 1 month of treatment. Long-term outcomes were evaluated in a telephone interview using a questionnaire., Results: Twenty-five patients were administered a botulinum toxin injection and 12 underwent balloon dilation. One month after the botulinum toxin injection, improvements were seen in chest pain (14 [56.0%] to 4 patients [16.0%]), regurgitation (16 [64.0%] to 4 [16.0%]), and dysphagia (25 [100.0%] to 5 [20.0%]). In the balloon dilation group, chest pain (8 [66.7%] to 1 [8.3%]), regurgitation (11 [91.7%] to 1 [8.3%]), and dysphagia (12 [100.0%] to 1 [8.3%]) had improved. A significant difference was observed in the mean remission duration between the botulinum toxin injection and balloon dilation groups (13 months [range, 1 to 70] vs. 29 months [range, 6 to 72], respectively; p = 0.036). Independent factors predicting long-term remission included treatment type (odds ratio [OR], 6.982; p = 0.036) and the difference in the lower esophageal sphincter pressure (OR, 7.198; p = 0.012)., Conclusions: Balloon dilation may be more efficacious than botulinum toxin for providing long-term remission in Korean patients with achalasia. Follow-up manometry may predict the long-term outcome.

Background & Aims: Achalasia esophagus is characterized by loss of peristalsis and incomplete esophagogastric junction (EGJ) relaxation. We studied mechanisms of esophageal emptying in patients with achalasia using simultaneous high-resolution manometry, multiple intraluminal impedance, and high-frequency intraluminal ultrasonography image recordings., Methods: Achalasia was categorized into 3 subtypes, based on the esophageal response to swallows: types 1 and 2 were defined by simultaneous pressure waves of <30 mm Hg and >30 mm Hg, respectively, and type 3 was defined by spastic simultaneous esophageal contractions., Results: Based on high-resolution manometry, the predominant achalasia pattern of type 2 was characterized by a unique motor pattern that consisted of upper esophageal sphincter contraction, simultaneous esophageal pressure (pan-esophageal pressurization), and EGJ contraction following swallows. High-frequency intraluminal ultrasonography identified longitudinal muscle contraction of the distal esophagus as the cause of pan-esophageal pressurization in type 2 achalasia. Multiple intraluminal impedance revealed that esophageal emptying occurred intermittently (36% swallows) during periods of pan-esophageal pressurization. Patients with achalasia of types 1 and 3 had no emptying or relatively normal emptying during most swallows, respectively., Conclusions: In achalasia, esophageal emptying results from swallow-induced longitudinal muscle contraction of the distal esophagus, which increases esophageal pressure and allows flow across the nonrelaxed EGJ., (Copyright 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)