Search

Objective: The aim of this study was to clarify the correlation between oropharyngeal microflora and postoperative complications as well as long-term survival after esophagectomy., Background: Although the oral cavity is known to be a potential reservoir for pathogens, the influence of abnormal oropharyngeal microflora on the outcomes of patients undergoing esophagectomy remains unknown., Methods: This study included 675 patients who underwent esophagectomy between 2007 and 2014. Saliva samples from the oropharynx were collected 2 days before the operation. There were 442 patients with indigenous flora (Ind group) and 233 with allopatric flora. Among the patients with allopatric flora, 140 had antibiotic-sensitive microbes only (Allo-S group) while 93 had different types of antibiotic-resistant microbes (Allo-R group). We investigated the correlation between the types of oropharyngeal microflora and the incidence of postoperative complications as well as long-term outcomes., Results: Sixteen microbes could be cultivated from the saliva samples. The incidence of postoperative pneumonia in the Allo-S and Allo-R groups was significantly higher than in the Ind group (P < 0.001). In addition, acute respiratory distress syndrome was more often observed in the Allo-R group than in the other groups (P = 0.002). A significantly higher rate of antibiotic use and longer hospital stays were observed in the Allo-R group compared with the Ind group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of allopatric antibiotic-resistant microbes in the oropharynx was an independent risk factor for postoperative pneumonia (odds ratio, 3.93; 95% confidence interval, 2.41-6.42). The overall survival was significantly poorer in the Allo-R group than in the other groups., Conclusions: Preoperative oropharyngeal culture is a simple and low-cost method that can predict both the occurrence of postoperative pneumonia and poor prognosis after esophagectomy.

Background: The three-dimensional video-assisted (3D-VA) system is known to provide depth perception and the precise measurement of anatomical spaces, unlike the two-dimensional video-assisted (2D-VA) system. However, the advantages of the 3D-VA system in thoracoscopic esophagectomy remains unclear., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 104 patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from 2016 to 2017. We performed thoracic esophagectomy using either the 2D-VA or 3D-VA system during this period. Whenever the 3D-VA system was available in our surgical center, we performed 3D-VA thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Perioperative parameters, including operation times, blood loss, the number of dissected lymph nodes, postoperative complications, and the duration of postoperative hospital stays, were compared between the 2D-VA and 3D-VA system groups., Results: There were 51 and 53 patients in the 2D-VA and 3D-VA system groups, respectively. Preoperative parameters, including age, sex, tumor location, clinical stage and the distribution of preoperative treatment, were not significantly different between the groups. Although intraoperative blood loss did not differ between the two groups, operation times were significantly shorter in the 3D-VA system group than the 2D-VA system group (P = 0.023). The number of dissected mediastinal lymph nodes was similar in both groups. The incidences of postoperative complications, including pneumonia, recurrent nerve palsy, anastomotic leakages and chylothorax, were similar between the groups. The duration of postoperative hospital stays was also comparable between the groups., Conclusions: An introduction of 3D-VA endoscopy into minimally invasive esophagectomies may contribute to the shortening of the duration of thoracoscopic procedures.

Background: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for patients with esophageal cancer has recently spread worldwide. However, whether MIE is less invasive has not yet been fully evaluated., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 551 patients who underwent curative esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from 2005 to 2014: 145 patients underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and 406 patients underwent open transthoracic esophagectomy (OE). We compared postoperative CRP levels with propensity score matching. In addition, long-term outcomes were also compared between the groups., Results: Operative time was significantly longer, and intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the MIE group compared with the OE group. Although the incidence of postoperative complications was similar between the 2 groups, postoperative serum CRP levels during the first 3 and 5 postoperative days and peak postoperative CRP levels were significantly lower after MIE versus OE (MIE vs. OE, median, 15.21 vs. 19.50 mg/dl; P < 0.001). The MIE group had significantly more favorable disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates than the OE group (3-year DFS rate, 81.7 vs. 69.3%, log-rank P = 0.021; 3-year OS rate, 89.9 vs. 79.2%, log-rank P = 0.007). MIE was an independent prognostic factor for patients with esophageal cancer. The incidence of regional lymph node recurrence was lower in the MIE group., Conclusions: MIE significantly attenuated postoperative serum CRP levels compared with OE. MIE could contribute to improved survival.

Esophagectomy remains the mainstay of curative intent treatment for esophageal cancer. Oncologic esophagectomy is a highly invasive surgery and both morbidity and mortality rates still remain high. Recently, it has been revealed that multidisciplinary perioperative management can decrease the postoperative complications after esophagectomy. In this review, we summarized the recent progress in each component of multidisciplinary perioperative care bundle, including oral hygiene, cessation of smoking and alcohol, respiratory training, measurement of physical fitness, swallowing evaluation and rehabilitation, nutritional support, pain control and management of delirium. The accumulation of evidence and the popularization of knowledge will increase safety of esophagectomy and thus improve the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to clarify the influence of Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) on treatment options, and on short- and mid-term outcomes in esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy., Methods: Patients who underwent curative-intent esophagectomy from 2009 to 2014 were classified by CCI. A CCI of ≥ 2 was defined as high, while a CCI of 0 or 1 was classified as low. Clinicopathological parameters, including overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS), were compared between the groups., Results: Among 548 patients, the most frequent comorbidity was chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 142, 25.9%), followed by solid tumor (n = 79, 14.4%). A high CCI was significantly correlated with older age (P < 0.001), surgery alone (P = 0.020), a lower number of dissected lymph nodes (P < 0.001), lower rate of R0 resection (P = 0.048), and prolonged hospital stay (P < 0.001). In the low group, OS after surgery was favorable in comparison to the the high group. Although DSS was comparable between the groups, the CCI was significantly associated with a poor prognosis in patients with stage ≥ II disease., Conclusions: The CCI was significantly correlated with the prognosis of esophageal cancer patients who underwent curative-intent esophagectomy.

Background: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is being increasingly performed; however, it is still associated with high morbidity and mortality. The correlation between surgical team proficiency and patient load lacks clarity. This study evaluates surgical outcomes during the first 3-year period after establishment of a new surgical team., Methods: A new surgical team was established in September 2013 by two expert surgeons having experience of performing more than 100 MIEs. We assessed 237 consecutive patients who underwent MIE for esophageal cancer and evaluated the impact of surgical team proficiency on postoperative outcomes, as well as the team learning curve., Results: In the cumulative sum analysis, a point of downward inflection for operative time and blood loss was observed in case 175. After 175 cases, both operative time and blood loss significantly decreased (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively), and postoperative incidence of pneumonia significantly decreased from 18.9 to 6.5% (P = 0.024). Median postoperative hospital stay also decreased from 20 to 18 days (P = 0.022). Additionally, serum CRP levels on postoperative day 1 showed a significant, but weak inverse association with the number of cases (P = 0.024)., Conclusions: After 175 cases, both operative time and blood loss significantly decreased. In addition, the incidence of pneumonia decreased significantly. Additionally, surgical team proficiency may decrease serum CRP levels immediately after MIE. Surgical team proficiency based on team experience had beneficial effects on patients undergoing MIE.