Search

Background: The objective of this systematic review was to identify pre-existing quality performance indicators (QPIs) for the surgical management of oesophageal cancer (OC). These QPIs can be used to objectively measure and compare the performance of individual units and capture key elements of patient care to improve patient outcomes. Methods: A systematic literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus and Embase was conducted. Articles reporting on the quality of healthcare in relation to oesophageal neoplasm or cancer and the surgical treatment of OC available until the 1st of March 2022 were included. Results: The final list of articles included retrospective reviews (n = 13), prospective reviews (n = 8), expert guidelines (n = 1) and consensus (n = 1). The final list of QPIs was categorized as process, outcome or structural measures. Process measures included multidisciplinary involvement, availability of multimodality diagnostic and treatment pathways and surgical metrics. Outcome measures included reoperation and readmission rates, the achievement of RO resection and length of hospital stay. Structural measures include multidisciplinary meetings. Conclusions: This systematic review summarizes QPIs for the surgical treatment of OC. The data will serve as an introduction to establishing a quality initiative project for OC resections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background A systematic review was undertaken to identify existing quality performance indicators (QPI) for the surgical treatment of oesophageal cancer (OC) with the aim of defining a set of QPIs that can be used in accreditation and allowing comparison of treatment and outcomes across jurisdictions, and provide a basis to develop quality improvement programs. These QPIs capture key components of patient care that are fundamental to the overall outcomes. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted by searching MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS with all literature available until the date of 1st March 2022 included. Search terms utilised were Quality of health care OR Quality improvement OR Quality control OR Quality indicators OR Benchmark, AND Oesophagectomy OR Esophagectomy OR Oesophageal neoplasm OR Esophageal Neoplasm OR Adenocarcinoma OR Squamous Cell Cancer OR Oesophageal resection OR Esophageal Resection OR Oesophageal cancer OR Esophageal Cancer OR Ivor Lewis OR Oesophageal Surgery OR Esophageal Surgery. Results Twenty-five articles were included in the final analysis. The selected studies included editorials, retrospective review, prospective review, expert guidelines and consensus. For OC QPIs, process measures included multi-disciplinary meetings, access to perioperative multimodal diagnostic pathways, and surgical metrics (margin negative resections and adequate lymphadenectomy). Outcome measures included the RO resection rate, reoperation, readmission rate, and length of hospital stay. Conclusions This systematic review summarises QPIs for the surgical management of OC. The data from this review will form the basis of a project to develop internationally agreed QPIs for OC resections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]