Search

The authors review the development and steps of the robotic-assisted minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy. Key goals of the robot-assisted approach have been to address some of the concerns raised about the technical challenges with the traditional open transhiatal esophagectomy while keeping most of the steps consistent with the open approach., Competing Interests: Disclosure R.M. Reddy, Intuitive Surgical, Medtronic, Genentech, Atricure, On Target Laboratories., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: It remains unclear what is the ideal conduit shape. The aim of this study was to evaluate association between specific gastric conduit morphology, considering width and length, with its perfusion and the incidence of anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy., Methods: Patients who underwent an esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis between 2015 and 2021 were evaluated. Indocyanine green angiography was performed to evaluate gastric conduit perfusion, and ingress index (arterial inflow) and ingress time (venous outflow) were measured. The conduit width at the middle of the conduit and the short gastric length as the length from the last gastroepiploic branch to the perfusion assessment point were measured. Propensity score matching was performed to compare wide conduits with narrow conduits. Narrow and wide conduits were defined as < 4 and ≥ 5 cm, respectively., Results: Three hundred fifty-eight patients were reviewed. After applying matching, the wide conduits had higher ingress index (48.2 vs 33.3%, p < 0.001) and shorter ingress time (51.2 vs 66.3 s, p = 0.004) compared to the narrow conduits. Including the short gastric length in analysis, creating a wide conduit is a significant factor for better ingress index (p = 0.001), especially when the perfusion assessment point is 5 cm or farther from the last gastroepiploic branch. Anastomotic leaks did not differ between the groups., Conclusions: Conduit width is a significant factor of gastric conduit perfusion, especially when the estimated anastomotic site was > 5 cm from the last gastroepiploic branch. Wide conduits seem to have better perfusion and creating a wider conduit might reduce anastomotic leaks., (© 2022. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.)

Impaired gastric conduit perfusion is a risk factor for anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of intraoperative quantitative assessment of gastric conduit perfusion with indocyanine green fluorescence angiography as a predictor for cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography using the SPY Elite system was performed in patients undergoing a transhiatal or McKeown esophagectomy from July 2015 through December 2020. Ingress (dye uptake) and Egress (dye exit) at two anatomic landmarks (the tip of a conduit and 5 cm from the tip) were assessed. The collected data in the leak group and no leak group were compared by univariate and multivariable analyses. Of 304 patients who were evaluated, 70 patients developed anastomotic leak (23.0%). There was no significant difference in patients' demographic between the groups. Ingress Index, which represents a proportion of blood inflow, at both the tip and 5 cm of the conduit was significantly lower in the leak group (17.9 vs. 25.4% [P = 0.011] and 35.9 vs. 44.6% [P = 0.019], respectively). Ingress Time, which represents an estimated time of blood inflow, at 5 cm of the conduit was significantly higher in the leak group (69.9 vs. 57.1 seconds, P = 0.006). Multivariable analysis suggested that these three variables can be used to predict future leak. Variables of gastric conduit perfusion correlated with the incidence of cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak. Intraoperative measurement of gastric conduit perfusion can be predictive for anastomotic leak following esophagectomy., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) have demonstrated benefits compared with open transthoracic or 3-hole esophagectomy. PROs, including quality of life (QoL) and fear of recurrence (FoR), comparing open transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) and transhiatal robotic-assisted MIE (Th-RAMIE) have been limited., Methods: At a single, high-volume academic center, patients undergoing THE and Th-RAMIE with gastric conduit for clinical stage I to III esophageal cancer from 2013 to 2018 were evaluated. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire in Esophageal Cancer (QLQ-OES18), and the FoR survey were administered preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Linear mixed-effects models were used for QoL and FoR score comparisons. Perioperative outcomes were also compared., Results: A total of 309 patients (212 in the group and 97 in the Th-RAMIE group) were included. The Th-RAMIE cohort had a significantly higher number of lymph nodes harvested (14 ± 0.8 vs 11.2 ± 0.4; P = .01), a shorter length of stay (days, 10.0 ± 6.7 vs 12.1 ± 7.0; P = .03), lower rates of postoperative ileus (5% vs 15%; P = .02), and fewer opioids prescribed at discharge (71% vs 85%; P = .03). After adjustment, there were no significant differences in QLQ-C30, QLQ-OES18, and FoR scores between the groups out to 1 year postoperatively., Conclusions: There were no clear patient-reported benefits of Th-RAMIE over THE for esophageal cancer. However, Th-RAMIE conferred several perioperative benefits., (Copyright © 2022 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Endoscopic therapy (ET) and esophagectomy result in similar survival for Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or T1a esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), but the long-term quality of life (QOL) has not been compared., Aims: We aimed to compare long-term QOL between patients who had undergone ET versus esophagectomy., Methods: Patients were included if they underwent ET or esophagectomy at the University of Michigan since 2000 for the treatment of HGD or T1a EAC. Two validated survey QOL questionnaires were mailed to the patients. We compared QOL between and within groups (ET = 91, esophagectomy = 62), adjusting for covariates., Results: The median time since initial intervention was 6.8 years. Compared to esophagectomy, ET patients tended to be older, had a lower prevalence of EAC, and had a shorter duration since therapy. ET patients had worse adjusted physical and role functioning than esophagectomy patients. However, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of having symptoms was significantly less with ET for diarrhea (0.287; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.114, 0.724), trouble eating (0.207; 0.0766, 0.562), choking (0.325; 0.119, 0.888), coughing (0.291; 0.114, 0.746), and speech difficulty (0.306; 0.0959, 0.978). Amongst the ET patients, we found that the number of therapy sessions and need for dilation were associated with worse outcomes., Discussion: Multiple measures of symptom status were better with ET compared to esophagectomy following treatment of BE with HGD or T1a EAC. We observed worse long-term physical and role functioning in ET patients which could reflect unmeasured baseline functional status rather than a causal effect of ET.

Background: Esophagectomy patients have high rates of postoperative complications. Maladaptive coping mechanisms such as smoking, alcoholism, and obesity-related reflux are risk factors for esophageal cancer and could affect recovery after surgery. In this study, coping mechanisms used among postesophagectomy patients were identified and maladaptive mechanisms correlated with smoking, alcohol use, or BMI., Materials and Methods: Patients who received an esophagectomy from 2017 to 2018 at an academic medical center were surveyed using the validated Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced, which includes 14 coping mechanisms (both adaptive and maladaptive) using a 4-point Likert scale. A Fischer's exact and chi-square was performed to measure the significance of difference between groups., Results: There was a 67.2% response rate (43/64). 61.3% (27/43) were obese. Sixty-three percent (62.8%, 27/43) had at least 10 pack-years smoking tobacco history; average smoking tobacco usage was 27 pack-years. 30.2% (13/43) had alcohol use. All 14 coping strategies were used by at least one patient. Twenty patients used only adaptive coping strategies, with acceptance being the most used (100%, 20/20 patients). Twenty-three patients used at least one maladaptive coping strategy, with self-distraction being the most used (91.3%, 21/23). All patients used some adaptive coping. There was a significant difference in mean number of coping strategies between groups (P-value <0.0001). Patients with maladaptive coping also demonstrated greater rates of active coping and humor (P < 0.05). There was no correlation between maladaptive coping and smoking, alcohol use, or increased BMI., Conclusions: Most postesophagectomy patients use at least one maladaptive coping strategy; however, history of smoking, alcohol use, or obesity does not predict maladaptive coping in the postesophagectomy period., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy remains a significant source of morbidity and mortality. The gastrointestinal (GI) microbiome has been found to play a significant role in tumor oncogenesis and postoperative bowel anastomotic leak. We hypothesized that the GI microbiome could differentiate between esophageal cancer histologies and predict postoperative anastomotic leak., Methods: A prospective study of esophagectomy patients was performed from May 2013 to August 2014, with the collection of oral saliva, intraoperative esophageal and gastric mucosa, and samples of postoperative infections (neck swab or sputum). The presence and level for each bacterial probe as end points were used to analyze correlations with tumor histology, tumor stage, and presence of postoperative complications by unequal variances t tests for multiple comparisons and principal coordinate analysis., Results: Esophagectomy was successful in 55 of 66 patients who were enrolled. Among those, the diagnosis was adenocarcinoma in 44 (80%) squamous cell carcinoma in (13%), and benign disease in 4 (7%). The 30-day mortality was 1.8% (1 of 55). Complications included anastomotic leak requiring local drainage in 18% (10 of 55) and postoperative pneumonia in 2% (1 of 55). No correlation was noted between GI microbiome flora and tumor histology or tumor stage. A significant difference (p = 0.015) was found when the variance in bacterial composition between the preoperative oral flora was compared with intraoperative gastric flora in patients who had a leak but not in patients with pneumonia., Conclusions: Patients with anastomotic leaks had increased variance in their preoperative oral and gastric flora. Microbiome analysis could help identify patients at higher risk for leak after esophagectomy., (Copyright © 2018 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Esophageal perforation is an injury associated with high morbidity and mortality. Initial management ranges from observation to esophagectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative mortality and safety of emergent esophagectomy for acute esophageal rupture when compared with elective esophagectomies., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a prospective esophagectomy database from a single institution from 1977 to 2013. Patients who were admitted for esophageal perforation and underwent esophagectomy were identified and compared with patients who underwent elective esophagectomy., Results: In all, 3,015 patients received an esophagectomy in elective and emergent settings; 90 esophagectomies were for acute injuries (52 for benign and 38 for malignant causes). A longer median length of stay was associated with emergent esophagectomy compared with elective esophagectomy (13 versus 10 days, p < 0.0001), and the complication rates were higher in the emergent group (51.1% versus 35.6%, p = 0.003). The survival rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years after surgery were not significantly different between the emergent and nonemergent esophagectomy groups for patients with both benign and malignant underlying conditions. Within the emergent group, there was no difference in 30-day or 6-month survival based on benign or malignant causes, but a significant difference was seen at 1 year (85% for benign versus 65% for malignant, p = 0.025) and 5 years for survival (72% versus 21%, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Emergent esophagectomy represents a safe option for the treatment of esophageal perforation, with mortality comparable to elective esophagectomy., (Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Esophageal endoscopic ultrasound is now regarded as essential in the staging of esophageal carcinoma. There is an increasing trend toward endoluminal therapies (ie, endoscopic mucosal resection and radiofrequency ablation) for pre-cancer or early-stage cancers because of concerns of high morbidity associated with esophagectomy. This study reviews our institutional experience with preoperative endoscopic ultrasound staging of early esophageal cancers in patients who underwent an esophagectomy to evaluate the accuracy of staging by endoscopic ultrasound and how this affects treatment recommendations., Methods: A prospective esophagectomy database of all patients undergoing an esophagectomy for esophageal cancer at a single high-volume institution was retrospectively reviewed for patients with early-stage esophageal cancer. This study analyzed patients with clinical Tis to T1 disease, as predicted by preoperative endoscopic ultrasound, and correlated this with the pathologic stages after esophagectomy. The surgical outcomes were evaluated to assess the safety of esophagectomy as a treatment modality., Results: From 2005 to 2011, 107 patients (93 male, 14 female) with a mean age of 66 years (range, 39-91 years) were staged by preoperative endoscopic ultrasound to have esophageal high-grade dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, or T1 cancer and underwent an esophagectomy. Tumor depth was correctly staged by endoscopic ultrasound in only 39% (23/59) of pT1a tumors (invading into the lamina propria or muscularis mucosa) and 51% (18/35) of pT1b tumors (submucosal). Of the endoscopic ultrasound-staged cT1a-lpN0 lesions, there were positive lymph nodes in 15% of pathologic specimens (2/13). Patients with pT1a-mm lesions had a 9% rate of pathologic lymph node involvement (1/11), and those with pT1b tumors had a 17% rate of lymph node spread (6/35). Esophagectomy was performed in all 107 patients with a 30-day mortality rate of less than 1% (1/107)., Conclusions: The sensitivity and specificity of endoscopic ultrasound for determining true pathologic staging are poor for early-stage esophageal cancers. Lesions thought to be cT1a-lpN0 by endoscopic ultrasound have at least pN1 disease in 15% of cases. Endoluminal therapy of these lesions based on endoscopic ultrasound undertreats a significant number of patients. Esophagectomy is still the standard therapy for early-stage esophageal cancers in the majority of patients., (Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The reasons why some patients with benign esophageal diseases require esophagectomy remain poorly understood. In this study we sought to define the rate of progression to esophagectomy and the postesophagectomy outcomes of patients with benign esophageal conditions in whom 1 or more previous interventions failed., Study Design: Using a prospective database, we retrospectively identified patients who had esophagectomies for benign disease between 1978 and 2010. Patients who underwent 1 or more esophageal interventions before resection met inclusion criteria. We examined factors associated with progression to esophagectomy and with postesophagectomy complications., Results: One hundred eleven patients underwent 1 or more esophageal interventions before esophagectomy. The most common indications for initial intervention were achalasia (37%, n = 41) and gastroesophageal reflux (33%, n = 37). More rapid progression to esophagectomy was associated with acquired esophageal disease (p < 0.01), initial esophageal intervention at age ≥ 18 (p < 0.01), and previous fundoplication (p = 0.03). Complications of esophagectomy included 30-day mortality (n = 2, 1%), chylothorax (n = 4, 3%), anastomotic leak (n = 17, 11%), and reoperation (n = 17, 11%)., Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of increased awareness of the potential progression to esophagectomy during repeated procedural interventions for benign esophageal disease. A subset of the patients who progress more rapidly, including adult patients and those with acquired disease and/or previous fundoplication, may benefit from counseling about potential esophagectomy., (Copyright © 2013 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Preoperative risk assessment, particularly for patient frailty, remains largely subjective. This study evaluated the relationship between core muscle size and patient outcomes following esophagectomy for malignancy. Using preoperative computed tomography scans in 230 subjects who had undergone transhiatal esophagectomy for cancer between 2001 and 2010, lean psoas area (LPA), measured at the fourth lumbar vertebra, was determined. Cox proportional hazards regression was employed to analyze overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) adjusted for age, gender, and stage, and the Akaike information criterion was used to determine each covariate contribution to OS and DFS. Univariate analysis demonstrated that increasing LPA correlated with both OS (P = 0.017) and DFS (P = 0.038). In multivariate analysis controlling for patient and tumor characteristics, LPA correlated with OS and DFS in patients who had not received neoadjuvant treatment (n = 64), with higher LPA associated with improved OS and DFS. Moreover, LPA was of equivalent, or slightly higher importance than pathologic stage. These measures were not predictive among patients (n = 166) receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Core muscle size appears to be an independent predictor of both OS and DFS, as significant as tumor stage, in patients following transhiatal esophagectomy. Changes in muscle mass related to preoperative treatment may confound this effect. Assessment of core muscle size may provide an additional objective measure for risk stratification prior to undergoing esophagectomy., (© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.)

Background: Esophageal cancer, chemotherapy, and radiation are all associated with an increased incidence of thromboembolic events (TEE). Development of a TEE during neoadjuvant treatment for esophageal cancer can alter the treatment course, as surgery may be delayed or cancelled because patients require anticoagulation therapy. We evaluated the incidence of preoperative TEE among esophageal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment and the impact on morbidity, mortality, and timing of surgery., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of 1,057 patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between January 1999 and May 2010. Of these patients, 534 were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation., Results: Preoperative thromboembolic events occurred in 75 of 534 patients (14.0%). The only preoperative factor associated with increased risk of TEE was increased preoperative weight (p=0.02). Fluorouracil significantly increased the risk of TEE (p=0.028, odds ratio 2.12, 95% confidence interval: 1.09 to 4.26), whereas there was no difference in patients receiving cisplatin (p=0.299). There was a trend toward an association between infectious complications during neoadjuvant therapy and TEE development (p=0.076). Patients with TEEs had a delay from neoadjuvant therapy to surgery (p=0.0004). The TEE group had a trend toward the increased onset of postoperative atrial fibrillation (p=0.0688, odds ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval: 0.96 to 3.27). There was no difference in respiratory complications (p=0.934), overall complications (p=0.859), 30-day mortality (p=0.899), or overall survival (p=0.790)., Conclusions: Thromboembolic events in the preoperative period delay the time to surgery for patients with esophageal cancer. Despite this delay, there is no demonstrable effect on postoperative complications or mortality., (Copyright © 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)