Search

This paper discusses some of the ethical issues encountered when involving refugee children in research. It draws on a study that aims to investigate how young Syrian refugee children experience Early Education, in one English local authority. This small-scale qualitative piece of research was developed in response to the deepening refugee crisis outlined by United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in August 2013 which suggested that as a result of the conflict in Syria, 740,000 refugees were under the age of 11. The study involves four children and their families -- who were resettled in England through the Syrian Vulnerable Person Resettlement scheme (2017). Also involved are four Early Childhood and Education Care settings. The research field is complex and the 'customised methods and methodologies' which have been adopted, to respond well to the challenges of the field, are described. Ethical issues concerning the conceptualisation of refugees, a narrative of trauma and location of positionality are expanded. The researcher has developed power-sensitive ethical research practices to help manage issues of positionality; negotiate access in the field; develop authentic relationships; address issues of cultural bias in self and others, and navigate the challenges of researching with very young refugee children.

The discipline and practice of participatory, practice-led research has grown rapidly in recent years and it is now widely accepted as making an important and serious contribution to the knowledge base of early childhood. Despite this progress recently we have come to understand that our worldview has needed to shift again in response to the troubling paradoxes we face in attempting to live out our participatory vision in our research practice. We are conscious too of the need to respond to a continued and sometimes reasonable professional critique of the robustness of our participatory methods. It is this shift in perspective that is set out in this article, and has led us to accept that praxis in itself is not enough, and that to realise authentically a participatory paradigm in our research requires us to develop a worldview in which reflection (phronesis) and action (praxis) done in conjunction with others, needs to be immersed within a more astute awareness about power (politics) and a sharpened focus on values (ethics) in all of our thinking and actions. We see this mix of phronesis, praxis, ethics and power at the heart of a "praxeological" worldview in modern early childhood research. This paradigm is helping us to shift our research work into what we hope will be a more profound and intensely participatory, and thus more authentically democratic, phase. In this article we aim to share our developing vision of "praxeological research." We look at its key elements; trace its roots, theoretically and conceptually; and explore the particular contribution it can make in research. We exemplify how an early childhood praxeologist with a participatory worldview might ethically operate in their inquiries, and consider what methodologies they might use and what challenges they might face in attempting to make praxeology a part of their "life of inquiry." Finally, we shall explore issues of power, status, visibility and progress within the research world of early childhood. (Contains 2 figures.)

This paper reports on a segment of Ph.D. research which was undertaken to develop participatory pedagogy working specifically within a praxeological paradigm [Oliveira-Formosinho, J., and J. Formosinho. 2012a. "Praxeological Research in Early Childhood: a Contribution to a Social Science of the Social." European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 20 (4): 471–476; Pascal, C., and T. Bertram. 2012. "Praxis, Ethics and Power: Developing Praxeology as a Participatory Paradigm for Early Childhood Research." European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 20 (4): 477–492]. It focuses on the development of listening practices through a process of pedagogic mediation [Oliveira-Formosinho, J., and J. Formosinho. 2012b. Pedagogy-in Participation: Childhood Association Educational Perspective. Porto: Childhood association and Porto Editoria]. The research was carried over two academic years in a private day care setting in England and aimed to enhance pedagogic practice with three and four-year olds. This qualitative methodology encompassed ethnographic techniques to develop a case study [Stake, R. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. London: Sage]. It researched the development of participatory practice through pedagogic mediation, as developed by the Childhood Association, Portugal (Oliveira-Formosinho and Formosinho 2012b). This paper reports on two listening methods which were developed between researcher, practitioner and the children in the setting. These methods demonstrate the co-constructed participatory pedagogy and the isomorphic nature of learning [Formosinho, J., and J. Formosinho. 2016. "The Search for a Holistic Approach." In Assessment and Evaluation for Transformation in Early Childhood, edited by J. Formosinho, and C. Pascal, 93–106. London: Routledge]. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents an introduction to the issue in which the editor outlines the European Early Childhood Education Research Association (EECERA) Ethical Code for research, including discussion of democratic values, justice and equity, and acknowledgement of multiple perspectives.