Search

Framed within the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) of the European Commission, the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) is producing an enhanced global dataset for the land component of the fifth generation of European ReAnalysis (ERA5), hereafter referred to as ERA5-Land. Once completed, the period covered will span from 1950 to the present, with continuous updates to support land monitoring applications. ERA5-Land describes the evolution of the water and energy cycles over land in a consistent manner over the production period, which, among others, could be used to analyse trends and anomalies. This is achieved through global high-resolution numerical integrations of the ECMWF land surface model driven by the downscaled meteorological forcing from the ERA5 climate reanalysis, including an elevation correction for the thermodynamic near-surface state. ERA5-Land shares with ERA5 most of the parameterizations that guarantees the use of the state-of-the-art land surface modelling applied to numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. A main advantage of ERA5-Land compared to ERA5 and the older ERA-Interim is the horizontal resolution, which is enhanced globally to 9 km compared to 31 km (ERA5) or 80 km (ERA-Interim), whereas the temporal resolution is hourly as in ERA5. Evaluation against independent in situ observations and global model or satellite-based reference datasets shows the added value of ERA5-Land in the description of the hydrological cycle, in particular with enhanced soil moisture and lake description, and an overall better agreement of river discharge estimations with available observations. However, ERA5-Land snow depth fields present a mixed performance when compared to those of ERA5, depending on geographical location and altitude. The description of the energy cycle shows comparable results with ERA5. Nevertheless, ERA5-Land reduces the global averaged root mean square error of the skin temperature, taking as reference MODIS data, mainly due to the contribution of coastal points where spatial resolution is important. Since January 2020, the ERA5-Land period available has extended from January 1981 to the near present, with a 2- to 3-month delay with respect to real time. The segment prior to 1981 is in production, aiming for a release of the whole dataset in summer/autumn 2021. The high spatial and temporal resolution of ERA5-Land, its extended period, and the consistency of the fields produced makes it a valuable dataset to support hydrological studies, to initialize NWP and climate models, and to support diverse applications dealing with water resource, land, and environmental management. The full ERA5-Land hourly and monthly averaged datasets presented in this paper are available through the C3S Climate Data Store at https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.e2161bac and https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.68d2bb30 , respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Climate reanalyses provide a plethora of global atmospheric and surface parameters in a consistent manner over multi-decadal timescales. Hence, they are widely used in many fields, and an in-depth evaluation of the different variables provided by reanalyses is a necessary means to provide feedback on the quality to their users and the operational centres producing these data sets, and to help guide their development. Recently, the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) released the new state-of-the-art climate reanalysis ERA5, following up on its popular predecessor ERA-Interim. Different sets of variables from ERA5 were already evaluated in a handful of studies, but so far, the quality of land-surface energy partitioning has not been assessed. Here, we evaluate the surface energy partitioning over land in ERA5 and concentrate on the appraisal of the surface latent heat flux, surface sensible heat flux, and Bowen ratio against different reference data sets and using different modelling tools. Most of our analyses point towards a better quality of surface energy partitioning in ERA5 than in ERA-Interim, which may be attributed to a better representation of land-surface processes in ERA5 and certainly to the better quality of near-surface meteorological variables. One of the key shortcomings of the reanalyses identified in our study is the overestimation of the surface latent heat flux over land, which – although substantially lower than in ERA-Interim – still remains in ERA5. Overall, our results indicate the high quality of the surface turbulent fluxes from ERA5 and the general improvement upon ERA-Interim, thereby endorsing the efforts of ECMWF to improve their climate reanalysis and to provide useful data to many scientific and operational fields. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this study we derive the environmental lapse rate (ELR) from vertical profiles of temperature in the lower troposphere, applying it to downscale air temperature of the new European Centre For Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis ERA5, which replaces ERA‐Interim (ERAI). We focus over the western U.S. region, a data‐rich area with observations of daily maximum and minimum temperature (Global Historical Climatology Network) and snow depth and soil temperature. Observations indicate an ELR of −4.5 K·km−1 in the region, lower than the commonly used −6.5 K·km−1. ERA5 ELR agrees with the observational estimates, with some overestimation in winter and limitations in the diurnal variability. The elevation correction of ERA5 temperature using different ELR showed the benefits of deriving ELR fields from ERA5 vertical profiles, when compared with a constant ELR. Simulations with the ECMWF land surface model, at 9‐km resolution, driven by ERA5 using different ELR corrections showed the added value of the methodology, but the impact of different ELR corrections is limited. However, the validity of the downscaling method in reducing temperature to station altitude suggests that there is sufficient generality for application at kilometer and subkilometer resolutions. By comparing the estimated representativity errors of observations with reanalysis, the improvements from ERAI to ERA5 are mainly visible in the random component of the error. Large systematic biases remain, which require further attention from the modeling and data assimilation, and limit the potential benefits of ELR corrections. Key Points: Environmental lapse rate derived from atmospheric reanalysis vertical profiles agrees with observational estimatesSurface downscaling outperforms ERA5, but the impact of different ELR corrections to the driving data is reducedSystematic biases in ERA5 near‐surface temperature require further efforts from modeling and data assimilation [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

At the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), reanalysis is a key contribution to the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) that is implemented at ECMWF on behalf of the European Commission.The role of reanalyses in climate monitoring applications is now widely recognized. ECMWF's reanalysis ERA-Interim is periodically used, together with other datasets, as input to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) annual assessment of the State of the Climate, routinely presented at the Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). ERA-Interim is also a resource for the production of Essential Climate Variables (ECVs) and Climate Indicators recommended by the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS). By optimally combining observations and models, reanalyses indeed provide consistent "maps without gaps" of ECVs and strive to ensure integrity and coherence in the representation of the main Earth system cycles (e.g. water, energy).This presentation focuses on the new ECMWF reanalysis ERA5, providing global estimates of the atmosphere, ocean waves and land surface quantities. It is produced at considerably higher resolution than ERA-Interim: hourly products are available at a horizontal resolution of 31 km on 137 levels in the vertical. ERA5 is publicly available from 1979 via the C3S Climate Data Store. A pre-extension back to 1950 is currently in production.Vast numbers of observations are assimilated using 4D-Var, both in situ and from satellites, that, jointly, are sensitive to a wide range of geophysical quantities throughout the atmosphere. ERA5 follows the evolution of greenhouse gases, volcanic eruptions, ozone and aerosols, as recommended by CMIP5. It uses a consistent reconstruction for sea-surface temperature and sea ice. ERA5 data products also include information about uncertainties, which is provided by a lower-resolution 10-member 4D-Var ensemble.The assimilation method includes a variational method for estimating observation biases that respects the heterogeneity within the observing system. This on one hand provides ERA5 products that are less sensitive to inhomogeneities and biases in its input data. On the other hand, the resulting bias estimates also provide a path towards more homogeneous long-term observational records.Updates are produced close to real time, which allow for an accurate and up-to-date climate monitoring, and provide information on climate variability, trends and extremes. As such, C3S publishes monthly-updated climate bulletins (https://climate.copernicus.eu/climate-bulletins), incorporating a global and European monitoring report covering surface air temperature, sea-ice and hydrological climate variables. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]