Search

Aim: To assess the reliability and predictive validity of the developmental and socio-emotional scales of the Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment (SINDA).Method: To assess reliability, two sets of three assessors forming eight assessor-pairs independently rated the developmental and socio-emotional scales of 60 infants. To evaluate predictive validity, 223 infants (gestational age 30wks [range 23-41wks]; 117 males, 106 females) attending a non-academic outpatient clinic were assessed by different assessors with SINDA's neurological, developmental, and socio-emotional scales. Atypical neurodevelopmental outcome at a corrected age of 24 months or older implied a Bayley Mental or Psychomotor Developmental Index score of less than 70 or neurological disorder (including cerebral palsy). Behavioural and emotional disorders were classified according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. Predictive values were calculated from SINDA (2-12mo corrected age, median 7mo) and typical versus atypical outcome, and for intellectual disability only (Mental Developmental Index <70).Results: Assessors highly agreed on the developmental and socio-emotional assessments (developmental scores: Spearman's rank correlation coefficient ρ=0.972; single socio-emotional behaviour items: Cohen's κ=0.783-0.896). At 24 months or older, 65 children had atypical outcome. Atypical neurological scores predicted atypical outcome (sensitivity 83%, specificity 96%); atypical developmental scores predicted intellectual disability (sensitivity 77%, specificity 92%). Atypical emotionality and atypical self-regulation were associated with behavioural and emotional disorders.Interpretation: SINDA's three scales are reliable, and have a satisfactory predictive validity for atypical developmental outcome at 24 months or older in a non-academic outpatient setting. SINDA's developmental scale has promising predictive validity for intellectual disability. SINDA's socio-emotional scale is a tool for caregiver counselling.What This Paper Adds: Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment (SINDA)'s developmental and socio-emotional scales have excellent interrater reliability. Replication of the satisfactory validity of SINDA's neurological scale for atypical outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several authors have suggested that dementia screening tests may be biased against low levels of education, whereas others find that a low level of education is a genuine risk factor for dementia. The present paper attempts to reconcile these conflicting views by examining item bias and test bias indices of the mini mental state examination (MMSE). Psychometric calculations and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses of sensitivity and specificity as performed by earlier studies were replicated and extended from the database of the Amsterdam Study of the Elderly. This is a population survey on cognitive decline and dementia (age range 65-84). Subjects with a low level of education (primary school) were compared with better educated subjects (at least some secondary education). Cases were matched by age and sex. The results indicate that the MMSE is not educationally biased as far as item characteristics, reliability, and construct validity are concerned. Yet its predictive validity as a screening test for dementia is educationally biased. This bias will effectively be eliminated with a two point higher cut off score for the subjects whose education extends beyond primary school. Even after such score correction, a low level of education probably remains a genuine risk factor for dementia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Epidemiological Catchment Area (ECA) program is a major step in psychiatric epidemiology because it uses a structured interview: the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS). This gives psychiatric diagnoses in different diagnostic systems and can be administered by lay interviewers. However many surveys on health-related topics cannot give the time needed to administer the DIS and train the personnel to use such a complex schedule as the DIS. The DISSA is a self-administered abridged form of the DIS and represents an effort to produce a short and simple instrument for three types of diagnoses: major depressive disorder, all anxiety disorders (generalized anxiety, phobias, panic) and alcohol disorders. In this paper we describe the DISSA and give preliminary evidence about its efficiency. This will be done by comparing DISSA results with clinicians judgments, the DIS and a checklist derived from HSC. The DISSA functions in a manner similar to its parent instrument but achieves this in a shorter and less costly mode. Actually the approach by episode used for assessing depression seems to work better than the DIS. Comparisons with the checklist show a clear superiority of the DISSA for depression, alcohol and anxiety disorders but not for generalized anxiety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetSyn) predicted future development of World Trade Center lung injury (WTC-LI) in a subgroup of firefighters who never smoked and were male. An intracohort validation of MetSyn as a predictor of WTC-LI is examined in the cohort exposed to the World Trade Center (WTC) that has been followed longitudinally for 16 years.Methods: Results of pulmonary function tests (n = 98,221) in workers exposed to the WTC (n = 9,566) were evaluated. A baseline cohort of firefighters who had normal FEV1 before 9/11 and who had had serum drawn before site closure on July 24, 2002 (n = 7,487) was investigated. Case subjects with WTC-LI (n = 1,208) were identified if they had at least two measured instances of FEV1 less than the lower limit of normal (LLN). Cox proportional hazards modeled early MetSyn biomarker ability to predict development of FEV1 less than the LLN.Results: Case subjects were more likely to smoke, be highly exposed, and have MetSyn. There was a significant exposure dose response; the individuals most highly exposed had a 30.1% increased risk of developing WTC-LI, having MetSyn increased risk of developing WTC-LI by 55.7%, and smoking increased risk by 15.2%. There was significant interaction between smoking and exposure.Conclusions: We validated the usefulness of MetSyn to predict future WTC-LI in a larger population of individuals who were exposed. MetSyn defined by dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and cardiovascular disease suggests that systemic inflammation can contribute to future lung function loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]