Search

Objective: Noonan syndrome (NS; OMIM 163950) is a developmental disorder caused by activating mutations in various components of the RAS-MAPK pathway. Recent in vitro studies demonstrated impairment of synaptic plasticity caused by RAS-MAPK pathway hyperactivity. Induction of synaptic plasticity critically depends on the level of attention. We therefore studied the induction of synaptic plasticity in patients with NS and healthy volunteers under different conditions of attention using transcranial magnetic stimulation., Methods: We investigated 10 patients with NS and healthy controls (HC) using paired associative stimulation (PAS) with different attention levels (unspecific, visual and electrical attention control). Changes in motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were assessed immediately after as well as 30 and 60 min after PAS., Results: We demonstrated that MEP amplitudes of healthy controls significantly increased from 1.00 ± 0.17 to 1.74 ± 0.50 mV (p=0.001), which was not seen in patients with Noonan-Syndrome (0.88 ± 0.09 to 1.10 ± 0.48 mV, p=0.148) and there was a significant difference between both groups (p=0.003) when using an unspecific attention control. Under specific electrical attention control, MEP amplitudes decreased significantly in patients with NS, whereas a visual attention focus diminished synaptic plasticity in healthy controls., Conclusion: Our study provides evidence that synaptic plasticity is impaired in patients with NS, which is probably a consequence of constitutive activity of the RAS-MAPK pathway. The induction of synaptic plasticity in these patients critically depends on attention., Significance: This is the first study that indicates reduced synaptic plasticity in patients with a RAS-pathway disorder. Our results may have direct implications for learning and memory strategies in patients with a RAS-pathway disorder., (Copyright © 2013 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim: We aimed to investigate the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP)-like plasticity by paired associative stimulation (PAS) in patients with high-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome (HFA/AS)., Method: PAS with an interstimulus interval between electrical and transcranial magnetic stimulation of 25 ms (PAS(25)) was performed in patients with HFA/AS (n=9; eight males, one female; mean age 17 y 11 mo, SD 4 y 5 mo) and in typically developing age-matched volunteers (n=9; five males, four females; mean age 22 y 4 mo, SD 5 y 2 mo). The amplitude of motor-evoked potentials was measured before PAS(25), immediately after stimulation, and 30 minutes and 60 minutes later. A PAS protocol adapted to individual N20 latency (PAS(N20+2)) was performed in six additional patients with HFA/AS. Short-interval intracortical inhibition was measured using paired-pulse stimulation., Results: In contrast to the typically developing participants, the patients with HFA/AS did not show a significant increase in motor-evoked potentials after PAS(25). This finding could also be demonstrated after adaptation for N20 latency. Short-interval intracortical inhibition of patients with HFA/AS was normal compared with the comparison group and did not correlate with PAS effect., Interpretation: Our results show a significant impairment of LTP-like plasticity induced by PAS in individuals with HFA/AS compared with typically developing participants. This finding is in accordance with results from animal studies as well as human studies. Impaired LTP-like plasticity in patients with HFA/AS points towards reduced excitatory synaptic connectivity and deficits in sensory-motor integration in these patients., (© The Authors. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology © 2012 Mac Keith Press.)

Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) commonly uses so-called monophasic pulses where the initial rapidly changing current flow is followed by a critically dampened return current. It has been shown that a monophasic TMS pulse preferentially excites different cortical circuits in the human motor hand area (M1-HAND), if the induced tissue current has a posterior-to-anterior (PA) or anterior-to-posterior (AP) direction. Here we tested whether similar direction-specific effects could be elicited in M1-HAND using TMS pulses with a half-sine wave configuration., Results: In 10 young participants, we applied half-sine pulses to the right M1-HAND which elicited PA or AP currents with respect to the orientation of the central sulcus.Measurements of the motor evoked potential (MEP) revealed that PA half-sine stimulation resulted in lower resting motor threshold (RMT) than AP stimulation. When stimulus intensity (SI) was gradually increased as percentage of maximal stimulator output, the stimulus-response curve (SRC) of MEP amplitude showed a leftward shift for PA as opposed to AP half-sine stimulation. Further, MEP latencies were approximately 1 ms shorter for PA relative to AP half-sine stimulation across the entire SI range tested. When adjusting SI to the respective RMT of PA and AP stimulation, the direction-specific differences in MEP latencies persisted, while the gain function of MEP amplitudes was comparable for PA and AP stimulation., Conclusions: Using half-sine pulse configuration, single-pulse TMS elicits consistent direction-specific effects in M1-HAND that are similar to TMS with monophasic pulses. The longer MEP latency for AP half-sine stimulation suggests that PA and AP half-sine stimulation preferentially activates different sets of cortical neurons that are involved in the generation of different corticospinal descending volleys.

Background: Neuronal plasticity is the physiological correlate of learning and memory. In animal experiments, synaptic (i.e. long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD)) and intrinsic plasticity are distinguished. In human motor cortex, cortical plasticity can be demonstrated using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Changes in motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes most likely represent synaptic plasticity and are thus termed LTP-like and LTD-like plasticity., Objective/hypothesis: We investigated the role of changes of motor threshold and their relation to changes of MEP amplitudes., Methods: We induced plasticity by paired associative stimulation (PAS) with 25 ms or 10 ms inter-stimulus interval or by motor practice (MP) in 64 healthy subjects aged 18-31 years (median 24.0)., Results: We observed changes of MEP amplitudes and motor threshold after PAS[25], PAS[10] and MP. In all three protocols, long-term individual changes in MEP amplitude were inversely correlated to changes in motor threshold (PAS[25]: P = .003, n = 36; PAS[10]: P = .038, n = 19; MP: P = .041, n = 19)., Conclusion: We conclude that changes of MEP amplitudes and MT represent two indices of motor cortex plasticity. Whereas increases and decreases in MEP amplitude are assumed to represent LTP-like or LTD-like synaptic plasticity of motor cortex output neurons, changes of MT may be considered as a correlate of intrinsic plasticity., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Motor learning takes place in several phases. Animal experiments suggest that synaptic plasticity plays an important role in acquisition of motor skills, whereas retention of motor performance is most likely achieved by other mechanisms., Objective/hypothesis: This study compared two spacing approaches and investigated the time course of synaptic plasticity after spaced motor practice (MP)., Methods: Twenty subjects performed a ballistic thumb flexion task in sessions of 6 × 10 minutes or 12 × 5 minutes. We measured peak acceleration of the target movement throughout the experiment and cortical excitability more than 60 minutes after MP via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). After a retention period, both parameters were re-evaluated., Results: Mean peak acceleration of the target movement significantly increased (6 × 10 minutes: 21.61 m/s(2) versus 30.80 m/s(2), P = .002; 12 × 5 minutes: 18.52 m/s(2) versus 29.65 m/s(2), P = .01). In both training groups, motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes of the trained muscle continuously increased after MP (6 × 10 min: 0.93 mV versus 1.57 mV, P = .19; 12 × 5 min: 0.90 mV versus 1.76 mV, P = .004). After the retention period, motor performance was still significantly enhanced, whereas MEP amplitudes were no longer significantly increased., Conclusions: These findings do not provide evidence that in small scale motor learning the duration of practice and rest influences behavioral improvement or induction of cortical plasticity. Our study demonstrates that cortical plasticity after MP displays a dynamical time course that might be caused by different mechanisms., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Low-frequency stimulation, which does not induce long-term potentiation (LTP) or long-term potentiation (LTD) by itself, suppresses consecutive LTP or LTD induction in vitro. We tested whether a similar interaction occurs in the human motor cortex., Methods: LTP- or LTD-like plasticity was induced using paired associative stimulation (PAS) with 25 and 10 ms interstimulus interval and conditioned by suprathreshold repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at a frequency of 0.1Hz., Results: RTMS completely abolished the significant increase of motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes after PAS(25 ms) (PAS(25 ms) only: 1.05+/-0.14 to 1.76+/-0.66 mV, p=0.001; rTMS+PAS(25 ms): 1.08+/-0.18 to 1.02+/-0.44 mV, n.s.) and also abolished the significant decrease of MEP amplitudes after PAS(10 ms) (PAS(10 ms) only: 1.00+/-0.14 to 0.73+/-0.32 mV; rTMS+PAS(10 ms): 1.15+/-0.35 to 1.25+/-0.43 mV, p=0.006). RTMS alone did not significantly alter MEP amplitudes but increased SICI and LICI., Conclusions: Low frequency stimulation increases intracortical inhibition and occludes LTP- and LTD-like plasticity in the human motor cortex., Significance: This finding supports the concept that metaplasticity in the human motor cortex follows similar rules as metaplasticity in in vitro experiments., (2009 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: One major attribute of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is the variability of motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes, to which variations of coil positioning may contribute. Navigated TMS allows the investigator to retrieve a stimulation site with an accuracy of 2.5 mm and to retain coil position with low spatial divergence during stimulation., Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether increased spatial constancy of the coil using a navigational system decreases the variability of MEP amplitudes and increases their reproducibility between different points in time of investigation., Methods: We investigated eight healthy subjects (mean age 23.8 +/- 1.2 years, range 22-25, four women, four men) at three different points in time with and without an optically tracked frameless navigational device, respectively. Input-output curves, motor threshold, and MEP amplitudes were recorded. We calculated the coefficient of variation as statistical parameter of variability. Reproducibility between different sessions was assessed via the MEP amplitude., Results: The coefficient of variance of MEP amplitudes did not show a distinct difference between navigated and non-navigated TMS in input-output curves. MEP amplitudes, indicating reproducibility, did not significantly differ between sessions with and without navigated TMS, either., Conclusions: Our results do not support the hypothesis that increased spatial constancy using a navigational system improves variability and reproducibility of MEP amplitudes. Variability of MEPs might mainly be due to not influenceable neurophysiologic factors such as undulant cortical excitability and spinal desynchronization., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess effects of deafferentation of the arm representation of primary motor cortex (M1) on practice-dependent plasticity in healthy adults., Methods: Twelve healthy, right-handed adults (18-48 years, median 20.2 years) performed two consecutive experiments (exp. 1 and exp. 2). Exp. 1 consisted of a motor practice (MP) of repeated ballistic flexion movements of the left thumb. This was followed by exp. 2 consisting of selective anaesthesia of the upper brachial plexus (SPA) to disinhibit the training M1 and a second period of the same MP. Peak acceleration of the trained thumb movement and the motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude in the flexor pollicis brevis muscle elicited by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation of the training M1 were studied before and after exp. 1 and after exp. 2., Results: After exp. 1 all subjects demonstrated an increase of peak acceleration (baseline: 19.23+/-3.81ms(-2); after exp. 1: 43.28+/-17.63ms(-2), p=0.008) and MEP amplitude (from 0.46+/-0.23mV to 1.26+/-0.77mV, p=0.03). There was no additional increase of these measures after exp. 2 (44.37+/-19.56ms(-2), p=0.78, 1.69+/-1.21mV (p=0.07))., Conclusions: Training of ballistic thumb movements leads to behavioural improvement as well as to an increased excitability of the corresponding M1 representation. These effects do not increase further during deafferentation of the training M1. In contrast to stroke patients [Muellbacher W, Richards C, Ziemann U, Wittenberg G, Weltz D, Boroojerdi B, et al. Improving hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Neurol 2002;59:1278-82], practice-dependent plasticity in healthy subjects cannot be enhanced by deafferentation of neighbouring motor cortex areas., Significance: Healthy subjects, in contrast to patients with central motor lesions, are capable of saturating practice-dependent plasticity to a level that cannot be further enhanced by experimental manipulation.