Search

Given the tremendous potential applications of excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) systems, ESIPT molecules have received widespread attention. In this work, based on density functional theory (DFT) and time‐dependent DFT (TDDFT) methods, we theoretically study the excited state dynamical behaviors of salicyladazine (SA) molecules. Our simulated results show that the double intramolecular hydrogen bonds of SA are strengthened in the S1 state via exploring bond distances, bond angles, and infrared (IR) vibrational spectra. Exploring the frontier molecular orbitals (MOs), we confirm that charge redistributions indeed have effects on excited state dynamical behaviors. The increased electronic densities on N atoms and the decreased electronic densities on O atoms imply that charge redistribution may trigger the ESPT process. Analyzing the constructed S0‐state and S1‐state potential energy surfaces (PESs), we confirm that only the excited state single proton transfer reaction can occur although SA possesses two intramolecular hydrogen bonds. In this work, we clarify the specific ESIPT mechanism, which may facilitate developing novel applications based on the SA system in future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Owing to the importance of excited state dynamical relaxation, the excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) mechanism for a novel compound containing dual hydrogen bond (abbreviated as "1-enol") is studied in this work. Using density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) method, the experimental electronic spectra can be reproduced for 1-enol compound. We first verify the formation of dual intramolecular hydrogen bonds, and then confirm that the dual hydrogen bond should be strengthened in the first excited state. The photo-excitation process is analyzed by using frontier molecular orbital (HOMO and LUMO) for 1-enol compound. The obvious intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) provides the driving force to effectively facilitate the ESIPT process in the S1 state. Exploration of the constructed S0-state and S1-state potential energy surface (PES) reveals that only the excited state intramolecular single proton transfer occurs for 1-enol system, which makes up for the deficiencies in previous experiment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the present work, three novel phenols (10a,11‐dihydro‐4bH‐indeno[1,2‐b]quinolin‐4‐ol (1), 5,6‐dihydro‐benzo[c]acridin‐1‐ol (2), and 5,5,7,7a‐tetrahydro‐4aH‐13‐aza‐benzo[3,4]cyclohepta[1,2‐b]naphthalene‐1‐ol (3)) have been explored theoretically in detail. Using density functional theory (DFT) and time‐dependent DFT (TDDFT) methods, we inquire into the intramolecular hydrogen‐bonding interactions and the excited‐state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) process. Exploring the steady‐state absorption and emission spectra under TDDFT/B3LYP/TZVP theoretical level in acetonitrile solvent, our calculated results demonstrate an experimental phenomenon. Based on analysis of the variations of geometrical parameters and infrared (IR) vibrational spectra, we confirm that O–H⋯N should be strengthened in the S1 state. Investigating the frontier molecular orbitals (MOs) and the charge density difference (CDD) maps, it can be confirmed that the charge redistribution facilitates the tendency of the ESIPT process for 1, 2, and 3 systems. By constructing potential energy curves, we confirm that the proton transfer should occur in the S1 state. In particular, the ESIPT for 2 and 3 systems are nonbarrier processes in the S1 state, which confirms that ESIPT should be exothermal spontaneously. This work explains previous experimental results and makes a reasonable assumption about the ESIPT mechanism for 1, 2 and 3 systems. We sincerely hope our work can facilitate understanding and promoting applications about them in future. The intramolecular hydrogen bond of 1, 2, and 3 compounds should be strengthened in the S1 state. By exploring frontier molecular orbitals and charge density difference, the charge redistribution can be confirmed to facilitate the excited‐state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) tendency. The ESIPT reaction for 1 compound demonstrates a low potential barrier, while that for 2 and 3 compounds should be exothermal spontaneously. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: In this present work, using density functional theory and time‐dependent density functional theory methods, we theoretically study the excited‐state hydrogen bonding dynamics and the excited state intramolecular proton transfer mechanism of a new 2‐phenanthro[9,10‐d]oxazol‐2‐yl‐phenol (2PYP) system. Via exploring the reduced density gradient versus sign(λ2(r))ρ(r), we affirm that the intramolecular hydrogen bond O1‐H2⋯N3 is formed in the ground state. Based on photoexcitation, comparing bond lengths, bond angles, and infrared vibrational spectra involved in hydrogen bond, we confirm that the hydrogen bond O1‐H2⋯N3 of 2PYP should be strengthened in the S1 state. Analyses about frontier molecular orbitals prove that charge redistribution of 2PYP facilitates excited state intramolecular proton transfer process. Via constructing potential energy curves and searching transition state structure, we clarify the excited state intramolecular proton transfer mechanism of 2PYP in detail, which may make contributions for the applications of such kinds of system in future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • The enhanced hydrogen bonding provides the impetus to promote the ESIPT reaction. • Photo-induced increased electronic densities around O 14 atom plays vital roles in attracting hydroxyl proton. • Atomic electronegativity could be more favorable for the ESIPT behavior of 4M3HF system. In view of the potential applications via regulating excited state behaviors, in this work, excited state dynamics of 4-methoxy-3-hydroxyflavone (4M3HF) with different atomic electronegativities (i.e., 4M3HF-O, 4M3HF-S and 4M3HF-Se) are explored theoretically. Dominating chemical parameters, infrared (IR) spectra, and bond critical point (BCP) analyses reveal hydrogen bond could be enhanced in S 1 state. Via light-induced excitation, by comparing the energy gaps of frontier molecular orbitals (MOs) and charge recombination, we find low atomic electronegativity promotes ESIPT reaction. Insights into potential energy curves (PECs) and transition state (TS) forms, we present low atomic electronegativity facilitates ESIPT behavior for 4M3HF system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Using the density functional theory (DFT) and time‐dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) methods, we theoretically explore a novel fluorescent sensor molecule (abbreviated as "2") (Sensors Actuat B‐Chem. 2018, 263, 585). Because of its symmetry, three stable structures can be located, ie, 2‐enol, 2‐SPT, and 2‐DPT forms in both S0 and S1 states. Via comparing the bond lengths and bond angles involved in the hydrogen bonding moieties, we find the dual intramolecular hydrogen bonds should be strengthened in the S1 state. And based on infrared (IR) vibrational simulations, we further confirm the strengthening dual hydrogen bonds. Upon the photo‐excitation process, the charge redistribution via frontier molecular orbitals (MOs) reveals the tendency of excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) reaction. In addition, the constructed S0‐state and S1‐state potential energy curves demonstrate that the excited state single proton transfer (ESSPT) should be the most supported one from 2‐enol to 2‐SPT form. In view of the S1‐state stable 2‐SPT and 2‐DPT structures as well as the fluorescence peaks of them, we can further confirm the ESSPT mechanism for 2 chemosensor. This work not only clarifies the excited state behaviors of 2 system but also successfully explain the previous experimental phenomenon. The strengthening dual intramolecular hydrogen bonds (O1H2···N3 and O4H5···N6) of 2 provides the possibility for ESIPT process.The redistribution of charge involved in the hydrogen bonding moieties facilitates the ESIPT reaction.Potential energy curves and emission spectra confirm that the excited state single proton transfer should occur for 2 system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]