Search

Objectives: This study investigates the effect of aerobic interval training on diastolic function at rest and during exercise in stable heart transplant (HTx) recipients., Design: Twenty-three stable HTx recipients (74% males, mean age 50 ± 14.9 years) were recruited to a training programme. Intervention was 8 weeks intensive training or control in a randomized controlled design., Results: At baseline, participants had normal or mild diastolic dysfunction at rest. During exercise, mean E/e' increased from 9.0 (± 2.8) to 12.8 (± 7.7) (p = 0.09), E/A increased from 2.1 (± 0.6) to 2.6 (± 0.7) (p = 0.02), and deceleration time decreased by over 50 ms, all markers of increased filling pressure. There were no correlations between diastolic function and VO 2 peak at baseline. After intervention VO 2 peak increased from 23.9 (± 4.5) to 28.3(± 6) ml/kg/min in the training group (difference between groups p = 0.0018). No consistent pattern of improvement in diastolic function at rest or during exercise was seen., Conclusion: The study does not support a role of diastolic dysfunction in the limited exercise capacity of HTx recipients and suggests that in these patients peripheral factors are of greater importance.

Aims: In heart failure, a reduced exercise capacity is the prevailing symptom and an important prognostic marker of future outcome. The purpose of the study was to assess the relation of coronary flow reserve (CFR) to diastolic and systolic function in heart failure and to determine which are the limiting factors for exercise capacity., Methods and Results: Forty-seven patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35 [median LVEF 31 (inter-quartile range 26-34)] underwent cardiorespiratory exercise test with measurement of VO2 peak, a dual X-ray absorptiometry scan for body composition, and a full echocardiography with measurement of LVEF using the biplane Simpson model, mitral inflow velocities, and pulsed wave tissue Doppler. Peak coronary flow velocity (CFV) was measured in the LAD, using pulsed-wave Doppler. CFR was calculated as the ratio between peak CFV at rest and during 2 min of adenosine stress. Fat-free-mass-adjusted VO2 peak correlated significantly with CFR (r = 0.48, P = 0.002), E/e' (r = -0.35, P = 0.02), and s' (r = 0.45, P = 0.001) but not with LVEF (r = 0.23, P = 0.11). CFR correlated significantly with E/e' (r = -0.46, P = 0.003) and s' (r = 0.36, P = 0.02), but not with LVEF (r = 0.18, P = 0.26). When adjusting for CFR in a multivariable linear model, s' but not E/e' remained independently associated with VO2 peak., Conclusion: In this group of heart failure patients, VO2 peak was correlated with CFR, E/e', and s' but not with traditional measures of systolic function. CFR remained associated with VO2 peak independently of diastolic and systolic function and is likely to be a limiting factor in functional capacity of heart failure patients.

Background: Insulin resistance has been linked to exercise intolerance in heart failure patients. The aim of this study was to assess the potential role of coronary flow reserve (CFR), endothelial function and arterial stiffness in explaining this linkage., Methods: 39 patients with LVEF < 35% (median LV ejection fraction (LVEF) 31 (interquartile range (IQ) 26-34), 23/39 of ischemic origin) underwent echocardiography with measurement of CFR. Peak coronary flow velocity (CFV) was measured in the LAD and coronary flow reserve was calculated as the ratio between CFV at rest and during a 2 minutes adenosine infusion. All patients performed a maximal symptom limited exercise test with measurement of peak oxygen uptake (VO(2)peak), digital measurement of endothelial function and arterial stiffness (augmentation index), dual X-ray absorptiometry scan (DEXA) for body composition and insulin sensitivity by a 2 hr hyperinsulinemic (40 mU/min/m(2)) isoglycemic clamp., Results: Fat free mass adjusted insulin sensitivity was significantly correlated to VO(2)peak (r = 0.43, p = 0.007). Median CFR was 1.77 (IQ 1.26-2.42) and was correlated to insulin sensitivity (r 0.43, p = 0.008). CFR (r = 0.48, p = 0.002), and arterial stiffness (r = -0.35, p = 0.04) were correlated to VO(2)peak whereas endothelial function and LVEF were not (all p > 0.15). In multivariable linear regression adjusting for age, CFR remained independently associated with VO2peak (standardized coefficient (SC) 1.98, p = 0.05) whereas insulin sensitivity (SC 1.75, p = 0.09) and arterial stiffness (SC -1.17, p = 0.29) were no longer associated with VO2peak., Conclusions: The study confirms that insulin resistance is associated with exercise intolerance in heart failure patients and suggests that this is partly through reduced CFR. This is the first study to our knowledge that shows an association between CFR and exercise capacity in heart failure patients and links the relationship between insulin resistance and exercise capacity to CFR.