Search

The article comments on the book, Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism, by Herman Cappelen and Ernest Lepore. The author claims that Cappelen and Lepore are minimalists. They claim that there is a short list of expressions and that the meaning of sentences is their truth-conditional content. They hold that sentences express complete propositions independent of context. The author explained his argument for Crazy Minimalism. The author also stated that there are two sides for the standard criterion for context-sensitivity.

The article offers some comments on the book, Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism, by Herman Cappelen and Ernest Lepore. The book's main thesis is that all context sensitivity can be traced through expressions. And when this thesis is combined with the claim that the semantic content of an insensitive sentence is a proposition expressed by every utterance of that sentence, the doctrine of semantic minimalism emerges. Although the author disagrees with a great deal in the book, he endorses the outlook of its authors. The author expresses his reservations about speech act pluralism and about semantic minimalism.

The article presents the response of Herman Cappelen and Ernest Lepore to commentaries about their book, Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. The authors argue that their view is not radical. They explained that Insensitive Semantics is about methodology in semantics. They focus on the interplay between certain basic methodological assumptions. The authors also clarified that the various tests for context sensitivity are only used to provide evidence that sentences or expressions are context sensitive.