Search

The efficient production of extracellular vesicles (EVs) from adherent cells in vitro can be challenging when using conventional culture flasks. Issues such as low cell density leading to low EV yield, and the inability to completely remove bovine serum EVs without starvation contribute to this challenge. By comparison, the two-chamber CELLine adherent bioreactor can produce significantly more EVs with improved time, space, and resource efficiency. Furthermore, it is highly accessible and can continually produce EVs using long term cultures without the need for passaging. Lastly, the 10 kDa semipermeable, cellulose acetate membrane separating the cell and media chambers allows for the continual use of bovine serum in the media chamber while preventing bovine EVs from contaminating the conditioned media., (© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.)

Background: Liquid biopsies offer a minimally invasive approach to patient disease diagnosis and monitoring. However, these are highly affected by preprocessing variables with many protocols designed for downstream analysis of a single molecular biomarker. Here we investigate whether specialized blood tubes could be repurposed for the analysis of an increasingly valuable biomarker, extracellular vesicles (EVs). Methods: Blood was collected from three donors into K3-EDTA, Roche, or Streck cell-free DNA (cfDNA) collection tubes and processed using sequential centrifugation either immediately or after storage for 3 days. MicroEV were collected from platelet-poor plasma by 10,000 g centrifugation and NanoEVs isolated using size exclusion chromatography. Particle size and counts were assessed by Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis, protein quantitation by bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA) assay, and dot blotting for blood cell surface proteins. Results: MicroEVs and NanoEVs could be isolated from plasma collected using all three tube types. Major variations were seen with delayed time to processing. Both MicroEV particle number and protein content increased with the processing delay. The NanoEV number did not change with the time-delay but their protein quantity increased. EV-associated proteins predominantly arose from platelets (CD61) and erythrocytes (CD235a). However, leukocyte marker CD45 was only increased in NanoEVs from ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes, suggestive of stabilization of nucleated cells by the specialized blood tubes. Epithelial cell surface marker EpCAM, often used as a marker of cancer, remained the same across conditions in both MicroEV and NanoEV preparations indicating that these EVs were stable with time. Conclusions: Specialized cfDNA collection tubes can be repurposed for MicroEV and NanoEV analysis; however, simple counting or using protein quantity as a surrogate of EV number may be confounded by preanalytical processing. The EVs would be suitable for disease selective EV subtype analysis if the molecular target of interest is not present in blood cells.

There is a significant and growing research interest in the isolation of extracellular vesicles (EVs) from large volumes of biological samples and their subsequent concentration into clean and small volumes of buffers, especially for applications in medical diagnostics. Materials that are easily incorporated into simple sampling devices and which allow the release of EVs without the need for auxiliary and hence contaminating reagents are particularly in demand. Herein, we report on the design and fabrication of a flexible, microporous, electrochemically switchable cloth that addresses the key challenges in diagnostic applications of EVs. We demonstrate the utility of our electrochemically switchable substrate for the fast, selective, nondestructive, and efficient capture and subsequent release of EVs. The substrate consists of an electrospun cloth, infused with a conducting polymer and decorated with gold particles. Utilizing gold-sulfur covalent bonding, the electrospun substrates may be functionalized with SH-terminated aptamer probes selective to EV surface proteins. We demonstrate that EVs derived from primary human dermal fibroblast (HDFa) and breast cancer (MCF-7) cell lines are selectively captured with low nonspecific adsorption using an aptamer specific to the CD63 protein expressed on the EV membranes. The specific aptamer-EV interactions enable easy removal of the nonspecifically bound material through washing steps. The conducting polymer component of the cloth provides a means for efficient (>92%) and fast (<5 min) electrochemical release of clean and intact captured EVs by cathodic cleavage of the Au-S bond. We demonstrate successful capture of diluted EVs from a large volume sample and their release into a small volume of clean phosphate-buffered saline buffer. The developed cloth can easily be incorporated into different designs for separation systems and would be adaptable to other biological entities including cells and other EVs. Furthermore, the capture/release capability holds great promise for liquid biopsies if used to targeted disease-specific markers.

Prokaryotes release membrane vesicles (MVs) with direct roles in disease pathogenesis. MVs are heterogeneous when isolated from bacterial cultures so Density Gradient Centrifugation (DGC) is valuable for separation of MV subgroups from contaminating material. Here we report the technical variability and natural biological heterogeneity seen between DGC preparations of MVs forMycobacterium smegmatisandEscherichia coliand compare these DGC data with size exclusion chromatography (SEC) columns. Crude preparations of MVs, isolated from cultures by ultrafiltration and ultracentrifugation were separated by DGC with fractions manually collected as guided by visible bands. Yields of protein, RNA and endotoxin, protein banding and particle counts were analysed in these. DGC and SEC methods enabled separation of molecularly distinct MV populations from crude MVs. DGC banding profiles were unique for each of the two species of bacteria tested and further altered by changing culture conditions, for example with iron supplementation. SEC is time efficient, reproducible and cost effective method that may also allow partial LPS removal from Gram-negative bacterial MVs. In summary, both DGC and SEC are suitable for the separation of mixed populations of MVs and we advise trials of both, coupled with complete molecular and single vesicle characterisation prior to downstream experimentation. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]