Search

Background: An ophthalmic workforce and infrastructure planning survey was undertaken to provide a valid evidence base for human resource and infrastructure requirements for elimination of avoidable blindness. This is the first time that such an extensive survey has been done in India., Methods: Pre-tested questionnaires were administered to all district-level blindness officials and ophthalmology training institutions during April 2002-March 2003. Supplementary data sources were used wherever necessary. Data analysis was done in Stata 8.0. Projections of the existing ophthalmologists and dedicated eye beds were made for the entire country using the mean, median and range for each individual state., Results: The response rate was 89.3%. More than half the eye care facilities were located in the private sector. Sixty-nine per cent of the ophthalmologists were employed in the private and non-governmental sectors; 71.5% of all dedicated eye beds were managed by these two sectors. Five states (Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu) had half the practising ophthalmologists in India. There was a wide disparity in access to ophthalmologists and dedicated eye beds across the country. Using the median to obtain medium projections, it is estimated that there are 9478 practising ophthalmologists and 59 828 dedicated eye beds in India., Conclusions: India will be able to meet the requirements for trained ophthalmologists and dedicated eye beds to achieve the goals of Vision 2020. Some states will need special attention. Instead of an across-the-board increase in ophthalmologists and eye beds, regions which are deficient will need to be prioritized and concerted action initiated to achieve an equitable distribution of the available resources.

Purpose: To systematically evaluate the quality of ophthalmology training in India.Methods: Questionnaires were sent to existing medical schools and accredited training institutions. Institutions were followed up thrice to obtain responses. Data were analysed using Stata 8.0.Results: Responses were received from 128 (89.5%) of the 143 institutions. Each year, 900 training slots were available across the country. Faculty: student ratios were better in accredited training institutions than in postgraduate medical schools. Fifty three (41.4%) of 128 institutions subscribed to more than 2 international journals. Fewer than 1 in 6 institutions conducted research projects. 11 (8.6%) institutions reported more than five publications in international peer-reviewed journals over three years. Only a third of the responding institutions had a wet lab.Conclusions: There is a need to improve the training facilities and optimally utilise the infrastructure available in postgraduate medical schools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]